UK: The Position Of Companies In Matrimonial Proceedings Following The Case Of Prest –v- Petrodel Resources Ltd & Others 2013 UK SC34

Last Updated: 4 July 2013
Article by Sarah Higgins

Supreme Court Judgment 12 June 2013 on appeal from the Court of Appeal (on appeal from Moylan J)

Facts

Mr and Mrs Prest were dual Nigerian and English nationals. It was a 15 year marriage with four children. There were seven companies in the Petrodel Group all of which were joined by the wife to her application.

There was no longer an issue about the former matrimonial home which was being transferred to the wife (subject to charges) and she was also ordered to receive a lump sum of £17.5 million, £24,000 per annum for each child and school fees. The husband had only paid the school fees. He was also ordered to pay costs (and the companies were jointly and severally liable to pay a proportion).

The husband has not come well out of the case in that court referred to his "persistent obstruction, obfuscation and deceit, and contumelious refusal to comply with rules at court and specific orders". Evidence for the companies was provided by Jack Murphy, director of PRL who refused to attend for cross examination saying that he was in "bad health" which the judge did not believe. The judge at first instance ordered that various properties should be transferred to the wife. Section 24 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 provides that a court may order that "a party to the marriage shall transfer to the other party ..... such property as may be so specified, being property to which the first mentioned party is entitled, either in possession or reversion".

The Court of Appeal upheld a challenge by the companies and so the wife appealed to the Supreme Court. In the Court of Appeal, Patten LJ said that the Family Division had developed "an approach to company owned assets in ancillary relief applications which amounts almost to a separate system of legal rules unaffected by the relevant principles of English property and company law" which he said must now cease.

Lord Sumption, giving the leading judgment, confirmed that legally a company is a legal entity distinct from its shareholders. This is also economically fundamental, since limited companies had been the principal unit of commercial life for more than a century. Their separate personality and property are the basis upon which third parties deal with them.

In this case the husband treated the companies' cash balances and property as his own and drew on them and the group was "effectively .... the husband's money box which he uses at will". This did not mean, however, that the corporate veil does not matter where the husband is in sole control of the company.

There was a discussion as to what piercing the corporate veil means. Properly speaking it means disregarding the separate personality of the company.

Lord Sumption referred to the case of Nicholas in 1984 where the Court of Appeal overturned the decision of a judge to order a husband to procure the transfer of a property belonging to a company in which he held a 71% shareholding. The Court of Appeal suggested that the result might have been different had it not been for the position of the minority shareholders and Cumming Bruce LJ thought that in that situation the court does and will pierce the corporate veil and make an order which has the same effect as an order that would be made if the property was vested in the majority shareholder. However, for instance Munby J in A –v- A 2007 said that the relevant legal principles which have to be applied are the same in the Family Division as in the other divisions.

Lord Sumption referred to the principle that the court may be justified in piercing the corporate veil if a company's separate legal personality is being abused for the purpose of some relevant wrong doing. He went on to talk about the concealment principle and the evasion principle. The evasion principle is where there is a legal right against the person in control of a company which exists independently of the company's involvement, and the company is interposed so that the separate legal personality of the company will defeat the right or frustrate its enforcement. This was not the case on the facts in Petrodel.

The court decided that if there is no justification as a matter of general legal principle for piercing the corporate veil, there is not a special wider principle which applies in matrimonial proceedings. "Courts exercising family jurisdiction do not occupy a desert island in which general legal concepts are suspended or mean something different. If a right of property exists, it exists in every division of the High Court".

However, a spouse's ownership and control of the company and ability to extract money will be relevant to the court's assessment of its resources. But that does not mean that the court has the power actually to transfer those assets from a company to a spouse. Moylan J considered that it was enough if the husband had the practical ability to procure their transfer, whether or not he was the beneficial owner. Lady Hale agreed that section 24 of the Matrimonial Causes Act does not give the power to order a spouse to transfer property to which he is not entitled. S 24 does not include property over which the husband has such control that he could cause himself to become entitled. The court can order the transfer of the shares, but in a case like this where the shareholder and the company are both resident abroad, this is likely to be ineffective. Obviously the reason why the wife was interested in the properties was because they were in England.

Resulting Trusts

Lord Sumption went back to the findings of fact by Moylan J concerning the holding of the various properties by the companies in question. He said that the court was entitled to draw inferences from Mr Prest's failure to give evidence or produce documentation in relation to the properties and the companies, so that it could be inferred (on different bases for each) that each property was in fact held on trust for Mr Prest by the companies. These included the transfer of some properties for only £1 consideration, and the allegation that the purchase monies had originally been provided at a time before the companies ever existed. The lack of explanation for any alternative structure by Mr Prest allowed Lord Sumption to find that:

"Since no explanation has been forthcoming...there is nothing to rebut the ordinary presumption of equity that [the company] was not intended to acquire a beneficial interest in [the properties]"

The husband did not co-operate and inferences were drawn against him. The court agreed that judges exercising family jurisdiction are entitled to draw on their experience and take notice of the inherent probabilities when deciding what an uncommunicative husband is likely to be concealing.

Matrimonial Home

This was not pursued on appeal and the matrimonial home was being transferred to the wife. The court suggested that in the case of the matrimonial home the facts are quite likely to justify the inference that the company was held on trust for a spouse who owned and controlled the company.

Nuptial Settlement

The wife sought to argue that the companies constituted a nuptial settlement but leave was refused to argue this and the court decided that that was not seriously arguable.

Comment

The conclusion is that piercing the corporate veil should only be invoked where the person is under an existing legal obligation or liability or subject to an existing legal restriction which he deliberately evades or whose enforcement he deliberately frustrates by interposing a company under his control. The coverage on Prest has been somewhat confusing; some reports hailing the Prest case as a victory for wives of wealthy company owning husbands. Mrs Prest was successful on the facts in that the properties were to be transferred to her, although subject to charges, but she was unsuccessful in many of her arguments. In fact, if anything the practice of the family courts in having more ready access to company assets has been curtailed. The discussion on the rare opportunities to pierce the corporate veil highlights that this route is unlikely to assist any spouse in a successful attack on the company assets: instead, the resulting trust route is going to have to be explored. If the assets have been acquired for value in the ordinary course of business and evidence is provided to this effect, no presumption will arise of a resulting trust, and the spouse's claims under s.24 MCA are unlikely to succeed, leaving the company's assets intact.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.