UK: Three Rivers: Further Narrowing of Legal Advice Privilege Confirmed

Last Updated: 10 March 2004
Article by Neil Jamieson and Ivan Wilkinson

In its judgement of 1 March 2004, the Court of Appeal has (confirming last November’s High Court ruling on this issue) further narrowed the scope of legal advice privilege. In particular, the Court has confirmed that communications with lawyers in the context of public inquiries and other "non-adversarial" fact-finding processes will not be privileged unless relating to advice about legal rights and obligations – as opposed to advice on presentation.

The Court of Appeal’s latest decision in Three Rivers has confirmed an important further narrowing in the Courts’ interpretation of what is covered by legal advice privilege. We examine below the current state of the law in the light of this most recent development. 

SUMMARY Legal professional privilege, which protects certain documents from disclosure in litigation, can be of two types:

  • Litigation privilege: this protects documentary communications between a client and his lawyer (or between one of them and a third party), if they were created for the dominant purpose of getting/giving legal advice in relation to pending or contemplated litigation, or the collecting of evidence for such litigation. "Litigation" here means adversarial proceedings: for example court proceedings and arbitrations, as opposed to "fact-finding" processes, like inquiries. Litigation privilege has not been affected by the Three Rivers decisions.
  • Legal advice privilege: this protects documentary communications between client and lawyer made for the purpose of getting/giving legal advice, whether or not litigation is pending or contemplated. Documents sent to or from a third party are not covered. The Three Rivers decisions have established that this second category of privilege is subject to the following key limitations:
  • Documents which are not themselves communications between lawyer and client (or evidence of such communications) will not be covered by the privilege, whether they were created for the purpose of being passed on to the client’s lawyers or not. For these purposes "client" is likely to be construed narrowly, as meaning only those employees of the client who actually instruct the legal advisers. Communications from other employees to the lawyers may therefore not be privileged.
  • Even where documents are communications between lawyer and "client" (as narrowly defined above), they will only be construed as being "for the purpose of giving or obtaining legal advice" if they relate to situations where the main purpose of the lawyer-client relationship is the provision of advice about the client’s legal rights and obligations. Advice about the preparation or presentation of information (particularly in the context of an inquiry) is not "legal advice" for these purposes.


After the collapse of BCCI, Lord Bingham conducted an inquiry (the "Inquiry") which covered the actions of the Bank of England (the "Bank"). Three individuals from the Bank, known as the Bingham Inquiry Unit ("BIU"), were appointed to deal with all communications between the Bank and the Inquiry, including obtaining advice from the Bank’s lawyers.

Subsequently, when the Three Rivers proceedings were brought against the Bank by depositors, it could not invoke litigation privilege, to resist disclosure of documents generated for the Inquiry, because the latter had not been adversarial. The Bank therefore had to rely on legal advice privilege. In April 2003, the Court of Appeal held that only communications between the BIU and the Bank’s lawyers (and documents evidencing such communications) could be protected by legal advice privilege. This was because only the three individuals comprising the BIU were deemed to be "the client". Communications from all other employees of the Bank were not deemed to be from "the client" for the purposes of assessing the privilege, even if intended for onward transmission to the lawyers, or even if sent directly from those other employees to the lawyers. The Court added that although it was unnecessary to express a view on the point, it considered that the dominant purpose of the internal documentation produced by the Bank was to achieve attractive presentation of the Bank’s evidence to the Inquiry, rather than obtaining legal advice.

At that time, the Court of Appeal was not asked to consider the follow-up question of which communications between the BIU and the lawyers were made for the purpose of obtaining legal advice, properly so-called. However, its decision opened up that issue and it was dealt with in a further judgment from the High Court dated 4 November 2003, now confirmed by the recent Court of Appeal judgement as follows:

  • Legal advice privilege only covers communications relating to advice about the rights and obligations of the client.
  • The dominant role of the Bank’s lawyers, concerning the Inquiry, was giving presentational advice to the Bank about how to present its evidence most effectively, not giving legal advice properly so-called. Such presentational advice did not attract legal advice privilege.
  • In this context, even if some of the communications between the Bank and its lawyers did involve advice about its rights and obligations (hence individually attracting legal advice privilege), this would not be enough to clothe the entirety of the lawyers’ advice in privilege.


The Court of Appeal’s affirmation of the High Court’s decision will have important implications beyond those in the Three Rivers proceedings (which are likely to be serious in themselves: a large part of the communications between the BIU and the Bank’s solicitors may now be open to inspection in circumstances where, on previous authority, that would not have been anticipated). Clients seeking advice from lawyers in relation to non-adversarial matters, which may potentially include public inquiries, and inquiries by professional bodies, the FSA, Inland Revenue, DTI or SFO, must now take heed of the following points:-

  • Documents are likely only to be capable of being privileged if sent to or from individuals who would be construed by the Court as being the "client", as opposed to mere employees of the client. The guidance on who will be "the client" is sketchy, but it would seem to be only those individuals who actually instruct the lawyers. Solutions such as nominating a wide group of employees to be the "client" risk being ruled out as artificial. Care should therefore be taken to avoid employees, other than the key individuals who communicate with the lawyers, creating sensitive documents.
  • Second, and perhaps even more importantly, communications between a client and its lawyers will only be privileged if they seek advice as to the rights and obligations of the client. Where advice is sought on presentational issues, privilege will not apply.
  • In practice, the line between advice on rights and obligations and advice on presentation is likely to be very hard to find. For example, is a person’s reputation to be equated with his or her legal rights and obligations so that advice from a solicitor, for the purpose of protecting that reputation in the context of evidence given to an inquiry, attracts legal advice privilege? The Court of Appeal’s judgment provides little guidance. The judgement states that advice about public inquiries will "plainly" be subject to legal advice privilege where witnesses are "exposed to, and concerned about, the risk of legal liability as a consequence of their role in [a] matter under inquiry". Yet the Court did not consider that legal advice privilege applied on the facts of Three Rivers, where the Bank was seeking advice about how to present evidence to the Inquiry in a way which minimised the potential "criticism" it faced, and ended up being sued by the depositors.
  • For the time being the only safe course of action must be to assume, in cases of doubt, that advice will be construed as presentational and hence not privileged. In those circumstances, care must be taken to address the risk at the outset and guidelines should be put in place between clients and their lawyers in relation to the preparation and content of internal documents and communications between them.

It is hard to believe that this will be the end of the matter and we must wait to see if an appeal to the House of Lords follows. The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal, even though it concluded that the law in this area is "unsatisfactory" and that it may be time for it to be reviewed. It should be said, however, that the Court of Appeal appears to have in mind even greater restrictions on the scope of legal advice privilege. In any event, as this latest decision may prove difficult or impossible to implement, a full review and some much needed clarity would be very welcome. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.