UK: Staying Court Proceedings In Favour Of Arbitration Where The Existence Of The Arbitration Agreement Is Disputed

Last Updated: 3 July 2013
Article by Bob Deering and Simonie Dimitrellou

Golden Ocean Group Ltd v. (1) Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi Tbk Ltd and (2) Genuine Maritime Ltd (Barito) [2013] EWHC 1240 (Comm)

The Commercial Court has granted permission to serve an arbitration claim form out of the jurisdiction, and issued an interim anti-arbitration injunction to constrain a Singapore arbitration, in circumstances where there was a dispute as to which of two defendants was party to a charterparty and as to the existence of an agreement for Singapore arbitration. In so deciding, the Judge set out the principles applicable to a stay of proceedings where the existence of an arbitration agreement is disputed.

The background facts

The proceedings arose out of a dispute as to whether Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TbK Ltd ("HIT") or Genuine Maritime Ltd ("Genuine"), said to be related companies, was the Disponent Owner of the vessel Barito under a charterparty with the Claimant, Golden Ocean Group Ltd ("Golden Ocean"), as the Charterer. The charter was subject to English law and London arbitration. Golden Ocean redelivered the vessel early, giving rise to cross claims for overpaid hire/value of bunkers and damages for early redelivery.

Golden Ocean commenced London arbitration proceedings against Genuine but Genuine commenced Court proceedings in Indonesia. The latter were settled by an addendum dated 8 March 2010 between Golden Ocean and Genuine, which provided that all disputes were to be determined in arbitration in Singapore under English law and that the charterparty was to be amended to reflect this.

By November 2010, Golden Ocean had reached the conclusion that the original fixture was in fact with HIT and that the addendum with Genuine was of no effect and/or was void for mutual mistake. Golden Ocean therefore commenced London arbitration proceedings against HIT. In January 2012, Genuine went into liquidation. In November 2012, the London Tribunal published its award, holding that Golden Ocean had contracted with HIT and that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine the merits of the substantive dispute under the charterparty.

In January 2013, Genuine commenced arbitration in Singapore. In February 2013, Golden Ocean issued an English High Court claim form against both HIT and Genuine seeking inter alia: (1) a declaration that the charterparty was between Golden Ocean and HIT and that Genuine was not a party to it; and (2) an anti-arbitration injunction restraining Genuine from pursuing the Singapore arbitration. Golden Ocean sought permission to serve the claim form out of the jurisdiction on HIT and Genuine.

The Commercial Court decision

Serious issues to be tried: England the appropriate forum

Mr Justice Popplewell held that there were serious issues to be tried as to whether Genuine was a party to the charterparty and whether Golden Ocean was bound, as against HIT, by the agreement to Singapore arbitration in the addendum with Genuine. The Judge held that Golden Ocean's arguments that the addendum did not change the underlying contractual counterparties and was ineffective as an agreement with HIT had a real prospect of success. Among other things, the Judge commented that, subject to a better understanding of the factual background, it would be surprising for either party to agree to bind itself to perform charterparty terms for a second time to someone who may not be its counterparty, without having first been released from its charterparty obligations to the existing counterparty. He also queried the effectiveness of the addendum in referring all disputes to Singapore arbitration, including those between Golden Ocean and HIT, in circumstances where HIT was not a party to the addendum.

The Judge commented that it would not be appropriate for the Court to grant permission to serve out of the jurisdiction if thereafter the Court would grant Genuine a stay of the English proceedings in favour of Singapore arbitration. As a result, the Judge had to address the legal framework in which a stay application would be considered. The Judge summarised the applicable principles as follows:

  1. The Court's jurisdiction to grant a stay may arise under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 or under its inherent jurisdiction.
  2. Section 9(1) permits a stay only if there is a written arbitration agreement which refers the matters in issue to arbitration. For s.9 to take effect, it must be established that such an agreement was concluded, and that its terms apply to the underlying dispute.
  3. If s.9(1) is fulfilled, s.9(4) requires the Court to grant a stay unless satisfied that the arbitration agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of having effect (e.g. in cases of fraud or misrepresentation or illegality, mistake or duress).
  4. Disputes which engage s.9(1) or s.9(4) must relate to the distinct arbitration agreement, not merely the matrix contract in which it is contained. If the arbitration clause has been agreed, the parties will be presumed to have intended the question of whether there was a concluded main agreement to be decided by arbitration.
  5. The Defendant has to satisfy the Court, and not show merely an arguable case, that he comes within s.9(1), before the Court can grant relief.
  6. If s.9(1) applies in principle, such that the parties are in "stay territory", it is then for the Claimant to satisfy the Court that the arbitration agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of having effect under s.9(4). If the Claimant cannot satisfy the Court of this, a stay may be ordered even if the Defendant can only make out an arguable case that the arbitration agreement is valid.
  7. The Court may order a trial of the arbitrability issue under s.9(1) or s.9(4). In this regard, the following factors are likely to be significant: (a) whether the arbitrability issue is likely to be resolved by the Court in any event (e.g. in the context of enforcement of an Award); (b) whether the resolution of the arbitrability issue will involve findings of fact or law which bear on the substantive rights and obligations of the parties in relation to the underlying dispute; (c) the length and cost of the enquiry into the arbitrability issue and how quickly it will be resolved; (d) whether there have been or will be related proceedings addressing the arbitrability issue between the same or other parties; (e) the degree of connection between the arbitrability dispute and England; (f) the strength of the arguments on the arbitrability issue; and (g) the nature and quality of the arbitral tribunal and arbitral process, including the supervisory jurisdiction of the curial Court.

Applying the above principles, the Judge concluded that it would be appropriate for the English Court to decide the arbitrability issue. The decisive factor was the risk of inconsistent judgments on both the arbitrability issue and the underlying dispute, given that two sets of arbitration proceedings were already in progress. In addition, there was a strong connection between the arbitrability issue and England, including that the relevant issues arose already in the context of a London arbitration against HIT and that the addendum was governed by English law. The Judge, therefore, granted permission to serve the claim form out of the jurisdiction on both HIT and Genuine.

Anti-arbitration injunction

The Court decided on the balance of convenience to grant an interim anti-arbitration injunction against Genuine to put the Singapore arbitration on hold pending the determination of the jurisdiction issue by the English Court, thereby avoiding unnecessary duplication and expense.


This case serves as a good reminder and a good future point of reference as to whether English Court proceedings should be stayed in favour of arbitration.

It also provides an indication that the English Court, subject always to the factual background, may be persuaded to accept that an addendum to a charterparty purporting to change the contractual counterparties and the arbitration provision of the original fixture is ineffective.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.