UK: An Implied Duty Of Good Faith In English Law Franchise Agreements - Is The Genie Out Of The Bottle?

Last Updated: 1 July 2013
Article by Gordon Drakes and Chris Wormald


The English law of contract is well known for not having a general duty of good faith and the approach to dealing with good faith situations in case law has been piecemeal, in line with the general development of common law. One of the main reasons advanced for this is the uncertainty which would arise if a general duty of good faith was imported into contracts generally.

However, recent case law has reignited the debate over whether or not English law recognises a general duty of good faith in commercial contracts.

In a recent High Court case between Yam Seng Pte Limited ("Yam Seng") and International Trade Corporation ("ITC"), the judge, Mr Justice Leggatt, held that a distribution agreement governed by English law contained an enforceable, implied obligation on the parties to act in "good faith".

Subsequent to the Yam Seng case, the Court of Appeal heard a case between Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust ("NHS Trust") and Compass Group UK and Ireland Limited ("Compass"). The Yam Seng case was cited in the Court of Appeal's judgement, in which, the Court of Appeal rejected the first instance ruling that there was an implied term which required the NHS Trust not to exercise a contractual discretion arbitrarily, capriciously or irrationally.

An even more recent High Court judgment (TSG Building Services plc v South Anglia Housing Ltd - 8 May 2013) also cited the Yam Seng case but followed the rationale of the Compass case, where the judge ruled that an express good faith clause did not extend to acting reasonably when terminating the contract, and that there was not an implied duty of good faith which would restrict the parties' contractual right to terminate at any time.

If the Yam Seng judgment was an attempt to let the genie of good faith out of the bottle, the Compass ruling can be interpreted as the Court Appeal acting swiftly to try and push it back in.

Nevertheless, all three cases highlight a growing tendency to attempt to imply obligations of good faith into commercial contracts. If the Yam Seng case is more than an a mere aberration in English case law, is it indicative of a slow but steady creep towards recognising a general duty of good faith in English law with regard to certain types of commercial contracts?

Franchisors and distributors should take heed of these developments and exercise caution before exercising contractual discretion and bear in mind that their longer term relational contracts may be held to a high standard of performance, including a duty to disclose.

Background to Yam Seng

In 2009, ITC entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with Yam Seng to sell Manchester United branded toiletries across duty free outlets in the South East Asian region.

The relationship quickly broke down amid accusations that ITC had misled Yam Seng on a number of issues, including its ability to supply the products, the nature of its licence with Manchester United and its dealings with another authorised distributor for the products in the region who was servicing the non duty-free market and whose pricing strategy was undermining Yam Seng's business model. As the relationship degenerated, ITC threatened to withdraw Yam Seng's exclusivity. Despite being ostensibly a dispute between two companies involving a global brand, in reality it boiled down to a relationship between two individual entrepreneurs, leading two small companies, who did not take legal advice prior to entering the agreement and who had diametrically opposed interpretations of the truth and legal culpability.

Yam Seng argued that its business suffered financial loss as a result of ITC's erratic and, at times, dishonest behaviour. Yam Seng argued successfully that the agreement contained an implied obligation to act in "good faith" and that ITC's breaches were "repudiatory". Yam Seng purported to terminate for breach and claimed damages, and also had an alternative and successful claim for misrepresentation.

The decision is surprising in that it seems to have been unnecessary to resort to any implied obligation of good faith. However, the written contract itself was skeletal and Mr Justice Legatt repeatedly emphasised the absence of consistent standards of open and honest behaviour on the part of the individual representing ITC, so it is perhaps not surprising that he analysed this issue in some depth.

Background to Compass

Compass' performance in a NHS Trust catering contract was measured by the calculation of service failure points. The NHS Trust was entitled to award those points to Compass and levy deductions from payments due by the NHS Trust. Compass claimed that the NHS Trust had exercised its discretion in this regard in a way which was contrary either to the implied term not to act arbitrarily, capriciously or irrationally, or in breach of an express duty of good faith and which therefore entitled Compass to terminate the contract. The judge at first instance, agreed, on the basis that the NHS Trust was exercising a discretion which attracted the implied term.

The Court of Appeal disagreed, partly on the basis that such an implied term was unnecessary because any wrong calculation or deduction was itself a breach and regulated by other terms of the contract, but also on the basis that it was the wrong sort of discretion to attract this implied term. The law only implies a limitation on the exercise of contractual discretion where a party exercising it had to make an assessment or choose from a range of options open to it, taking into account the interests of both parties. Here, the contractual discretion related to an absolute contractual right to award the service failure points or not.

The more recent TSG Building Services case will not be analysed in this article, other than to note that in its first opportunity to revisit the issue of good faith since the Yam Seng case, the High Court's ruling in this case is closer in spirit to the Compass ruling.


In the Yam Seng judgment, Mr Justice Legatt recognises the "traditional English hostility" towards the doctrine of good faith but states that, to the extent English law does not recognise this general duty, "this jurisdiction would appear to be swimming against the tide", as evidenced by its introduction in the implementation of various specific pieces of European legislation and an increasing recognition of a general duty of good faith in other common law jurisdictions, such as the US, Canada and Australia and much closer to home in Scotland.

He argues that implying such a duty is no more uncertain than contractual interpretation - an implied term of good faith is to be determined objectively, based on the presumed intention of the parties to behave in good faith as a reasonable onlooker would assess it and given the relevant background context of the contract. It may extend to a duty to disclose information. This is consistent, he argues, with the case by case approach of common law jurisdictions and he makes the point that an implied term can be modified by express terms in the contract.

Mr Justice Leggatt concludes by noting that contracts involving a longer term relationship and substantial commitment require a high degree of communication, cooperation and predictable performance based on mutual trust and confidence. These expectations are rarely legislated for in the express terms of contracts, but are implicit in the parties' understanding, and are necessary to give business efficacy to such arrangements. Examples of "relational contracts" included franchise agreements, joint venture agreements and long term distribution agreements.

The Compass case demonstrates the Court of Appeal's willingness to defer to the express terms of a contract when assessing culpability for breach. One wonders whether the brief reference to the Yam Seng case in the Court of Appeal's judgment is itself a thinly veiled and deliberate attempt to downplay the significance of Mr Justice Leggatt's comments and reaffirm the cherished certainty of express contractual terms.

What does this all mean for Franchisors?

In light of the Court of Appeal's judgment, it is far too early to say that English law now has a general implied duty of good faith which applies to franchise agreements.

However, it is dangerous to disregard the views of a distinguished High Court judge as merely those of a "lone rider". The concept of good faith underpins many of the franchise specific regulations which apply in jurisdictions across the world and it may be that English law is "swimming against the tide", albeit valiantly, as it sticks to its common law traditions of developing principles in relation to these matters on a case by case basis.

One response to this ruling could be to look at franchise agreement boilerplates and consider excluding all implied terms and conditions: but conceivably this may lead to a franchisee asking if a franchisor is therefore intending to engage in commercially unacceptable behaviour! What is clear is that it is prudent for franchisors to take extra care, both when exercising interm contractual discretions and when they consider the manner in which they provide pre-contractual disclosure (which is a requirement of membership for the British Franchise Association) and ongoing information to franchisees during the course of the relationship.

Businesses which operate corporate and franchise networks should ensure that there is a good two-way line of communication with their franchised network, and carefully consider whether their supply chains are seen to operate transparently and fairly. Senior Associate t: +44 (0)207 861 4525 e: An Implied Duty of Good Faith in English Law Franchise Agreements - is the Genie Out of the Bottle

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Gordon Drakes
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Goodman Derrick LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Goodman Derrick LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions