UK: Insurance And Reinsurance Weekly Update - 21 May 2013

Last Updated: 29 May 2013
Article by Nigel Brook

Welcome to the eighteenth edition of Clyde & Co's (Re)insurance and litigation caselaw weekly updates for 2013.

These updates are aimed at keeping you up to speed and informed of the latest developments in caselaw relevant to your practice.

This week's caselaw

Slocom Trading & Anor v Tatik Inc
A court decides the appropriate discretionary rate of interest where an award is in Euros.

United Marine Aggregates Ltd v GM Welding & Novae
An insurer appeals against a judge's decision to award it only 50% of its costs.

Fons HF v Corporal
A case considers the approach of the court to an application to extend time to file witness statements, post-Jackson reforms.

SOCA v Namli & Ors
A decision on whether a civil recovery order could be granted in favour of SOCA where an individual had been acquitted in foreign criminal proceedings.

Slocom Trading & Anor v Tatik Inc

Discretionary rate of interest where award in Euros

One of the issues in this case was the appropriate rate of interest to be awarded pursuant to the court's discretion under section 35A of the Senior Courts Act 1981 for pre-judgment interest, where the judgment is in Euros rather than Sterling. The defendants submitted that it should be 1% over the European Central Bank ("ECB") rate, but the claimant argued that this rate had been so low over the relevant period that it did not represent a commercial rate. The claimant sought to rely on the rate awarded by the Commercial Court for judgments in US Dollars ie 3% over the US Federal Reserve Funds rate. That argument was rejected by Roth J. He held that the practice for US dollar judgments was of little relevance and the claimant had not put in evidence of the borrowing rate for Euros. Moreover, the claimant was an investment vehicle and not a trading entity. Hence, it did not borrow money - what it had lost was the investment potential which its money could have earned. Accordingly, the ECB rate plus 1% was the appropriate rate.

As for post-judgment interest, since the judgment was in a foreign currency, the court has a discretion under section 44A of the Administration of Justice Act to award a different rate from the 8% rate applied to judgments in Sterling. Roth J said that the applicable rate should be the same as that for pre-judgment interest (ie 1% above the ECB rate). He also rejected an argument that the court had the power to award compound interest under section 44A.

United Marine Aggregates Ltd v GM Welding & Novae

Insurer appeals against judge's decision to award it only 50% of its costs

The claimant sued the defendant for negligence/breach of contractual duty following a fire at its premises. The defendant sought an indemnity from its public liability insurer (the Part 20 defendant to this action). At trial, it was held that there had been no breach of duty and, furthermore, the defendant would not have been entitled to an indemnity from its insurer because it had breached a warranty in the policy (which required combustible materials in the immediate vicinity of hot work to be covered and protected). Although neither the claimant nor the defendant argued that the insurer should be deprived of any part of its costs, the judge decided to award the insurer only 50% of its costs. He held that the insurer's costs were excessive because, in addition to the "covered and protected" argument, the insurer had also run two other alleged breach of warranty defences, one of which was abandoned and the other was rejected by the judge. The insurer appealed against that decision.

The Court of Appeal has now allowed that appeal. The judge had erred in principle in reducing the proportion of costs which the insurer could recover because of concerns about the level of costs incurred – that was a matter for assessment by a costs judge. Nor had the insurer been given any opportunity to be heard before the reduction was ordered.

The judge had held that the insurer's lengthy cross-examination of one of the defendant's employees "went much further than necessary". Tomlinson LJ accepted that "in a trial in which the principal combatants are competently represented, the intervention of a third party on issues already canvassed can be an irritant". However, the insurer had faced a substantial claim (over GBP 4 million) and was entitled to defend its refusal to indemnify. The insurer had also been entitled to cross-examine the defendant's employees about whether they were aware of a warranty in the policy (because the insurer was entitled to make the point "for what it was worth" that if the employees were unaware of the term, they were unlikely to have planned to comply with it).

Fons HF v Corporal

Approach of the court to an application to extend time to file witness statements, post-Jackson reforms

The parties were ordered to exchange witness statements. Although the claimant was willing and able to do so, it eventually became apparent that the defendant was not in a position to do so. An application was made to court for an extension of time to file the witness statements. Although the action was commenced prior to the reforms to the CPR on 1 April 2013, the application was heard after that date and so the new overriding objective applies. This provides, in relevant part, that "dealing with a case justly and at proportionate costs includes, so far as is practicable...enforcing compliance with rules, practice directions and orders". Pelling HHJ held as follows:

(1) Both parties were in breach of the order. The claimant should have served its witness statements or, at the very least, lodged them at court and either offered them for exchange or provided them to the defendants in escrow in a sealed envelope explaining to the court at the time why that step was taken.

(2) The defendant was more seriously in breach of the order though. The judge said he had come close to refusing an extension to either of the parties given the clear breach of the overriding objective. However, in the end he agreed to extend time because the hearing here had taken place only a very short while after the amendment of the CPR and because the period that had elapsed since the parties agreed an extension between themselves had been relatively short.

However, the judge cautioned as follows: "all parties and the wider litigation world should be aware that all courts at all levels are now required to take a very much stricter view of the failure by parties to comply with directions, particularly where the failure to comply is likely to lead into a waste of the limited resources made available to those with cases to litigate".

SOCA v Namli & Ors

Whether a civil recovery order could be granted in favour of SOCA where an individual had been acquitted in foreign criminal proceedings/inferences relating to money-laundering

The Serious Organised Crime Agency ("SOCA") sought a civil recovery order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 in respect of monies held in a London bank account in the name of a BVI company owned by an individual ordinarily resident in Turkey. Two particular issues which arose in the case are of general interest:

(1) What was the effect of the individual being acquitted of money laundering in Turkish criminal proceedings? Males J reviewed the relevant caselaw and summarised the position as follows: (a) an acquittal, either here or abroad, is not conclusive as to the defendant's innocence; (b) in civil recovery proceedings, the court reaches a conclusion on the balance of probabilities; (c) an acquittal is evidence on which the defendant can rely but the weight to be given to it will depend on the reason for the acquittal (ie whether it was on the merits of the case or because of shortcomings in the prosecution); and (d) in general, the English court should not attempt to find fault with the reasoning of the foreign court.

Here, the court took account of the acquittal but attached more weight to the individual's evidence in these proceedings.

(2) SOCA argued that inferences should be drawn by the court against the individual because he had failed to explain the source of the funds in question. The judge agreed that, if a transaction looks like money laundering and has not been satisfactorily explained by a defendant who ought to be in a position to explain it if there is an innocent explanation, "that is probably what it is".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Nigel Brook
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.