UK: Insurance And Reinsurance Weekly Update - 26 March 2013

Last Updated: 8 April 2013
Article by Nigel Brook

Welcome to the eleventh edition of Clyde & Co's (Re)insurance and litigation caselaw weekly updates for 2013.

These updates are aimed at keeping you up to speed and informed of the latest developments in caselaw relevant to your practice.

THIS WEEK'S CASELAW

Nelson's Yard Management & Ors v Eziefula

Discontinuance and departing from the presumption that the claimant must pay the defendant's costs

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/235.html

The claimants appealed against a decision that there was no justification in this case to depart from the presumption under CPR r38.6 that they should pay the costs of the defendant against whom they had discontinued their proceedings. The Court of Appeal referred to the decision in Teasdale v HSBC (see Weekly Update 12/10), which it accepted represented the correct approach in relation to costs on discontinuance. This case was primarily concerned with the following principle set out in Teasdale: no change in circumstances is likely to suffice unless it has been brought about by some form of unreasonable conduct on the part of the defendant, which in all the circumstances provides a good reason for departing from the rule.

The Court of Appeal confirmed that, just because a claimant has already achieved almost all he could reasonably hope to achieve from the proceedings (and wishes to avoid a trial which would only be about costs), that does not justify a departure from the ordinary rule. Furthermore, once there is to be no trial, it is not for the court (when considering costs) to decide whether or not the claim would have succeeded. Where a defence has no real prospect of success, the claimant should apply for a strike out or summary judgment and not for a disapplication of the rule under CPR r38.6.

However, in this case, the defendant had also failed to respond to the claimants' pre-action correspondence. Although that correspondence had failed to specify a date by which a reply was required (as set out in the Practice Direction on pre-action conduct), the protocols "are not to be followed slavishly but reasonably". Here, the defendant had shown no willingness to set out his position, to narrow the issues, or to discuss mediation or settlement. The court could take all that into account.

The Court of Appeal set aside the first instance decision and held that, taking into account the failure of the defendant to respond to the pre-action correspondence, and the reasonableness of the claimant in starting proceedings, that justified a departure from the normal rule. However, it would be inappropriate in this case to order the defendant to pay the claimants' costs of the action.

Sycamore Bidco v Breslin

Making a Part 36 offer to two defendants/costs consequences where there is a CFA

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2013/583.html

Various costs issues arose in this case, including the following:

  1. What was the position where the claimant made a Part 36 offer to two defendants covering two claims, but beats its offer only in relation to one of the defendants? Here, the claimant had sent a Part 36 offer to both defendants offering to accept £5.5 million. Mann J confirmed that it would have been open to one or other of them to accept it and pay £5.5 million in full. As such, the offer to one of the defendants was to settle for that amount and given that he was eventually found liable to pay a lesser amount, the claimant had not beaten its Part 36 offer to him. As the judge pointed out, this result could have been avoided by "the Part 36 offer splitting out the two separate liabilities and expressing itself as being two separate offers".
  2. The other defendant was held liable to pay an amount which was greater than the Part 36 offer though. He sought to argue that it would be unjust to apply the usual Part 36 costs consequences to him, though, for various reasons. These were rejected by the judge. For example, the judge did not think the fact the claimant had entered into a CFA "whose uplift was likely to get in the way of settlement" justified a departure from the ordinary Part 36 costs consequences. Nor was it enough that the defendant had not unreasonably refused to negotiate and that the claimant had not quantified its claim until late in the action.

COMMENT: There is prior caselaw (decided before the Part 36 rule change in 2007) to support the argument that, where a claimant has the benefit of a CFA (and has therefore not had to fund the costs of the proceedings) the court may not order enhanced interest on costs, even if the Part 36 offer is beaten. Even after Part 36 was amended, in Jones MP v Associated Newspapers (see Weekly Update 26/07), interest at an enhanced rate was said to not be appropriate where the claimant was not out of pocket and the solicitors were to receive, in any event, a 100% uplift on recoverable costs. However, it was said that that would not necessarily apply in all CFA cases and judges must consider what is just on the particular facts of the case before them. The amount of the uplift in this case was not disclosed.

Challinor & Ors v Bellis & Anor

Appropriate discretionary interest rate where commercial claimant does not depend on credit

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2013/620.html

Clyde & Co for defendants

One of the issues in this case was the appropriate rate of discretionary interest in a commercial claim. Hildyard J said that the prior caselaw distinguished between two cases: (1) where money has been lost and the claimant company has had to borrow funds to maintain the business; and (2) where no money has been lost – instead the award increases the claimant's funds (eg a personal injury case). In the first case, the court adopts a broad brush approach to apply a rate approximating to the cost that a claimant in that line of business would have incurred in borrowing money. In the second case, the court seeks to identify an appropriate rate to represent the minimum return which the claimant would have achieved had the money been placed on deposit at the date of the event giving rise to the claim.

However, this case fell into a third category: the claimant was not running a business which depended on credit (ie the presumption of the need for credit was weak or non-existent), and so its loss of money might only deprive it of other opportunities. In such a case, neither a minimum investment nor a proxy borrowing cost basis was appropriate. Instead the appropriate rate was "such rate as is reasonable to assume that persons in the position of the Claimants would have had to pay for monies for geared investment". In this case, the judge expected rates lower than unsecured lending rates to have been available to these borrowers because they plainly had surplus available assets and any borrowing would not have been to fund trading activities but instead to fund a geared investment strategy.

Hildyard J concluded that the appropriate rate to compensate the claimants for being kept out of their money was 3% above base rate.

Taylor v A.Novo

Whether "secondary victim" could claim even though not present at scene of accident - of possible interest to liability insurers

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/194.html

An employee was injured in an accident at work, caused by the admitted negligence of her employer. She died suddenly, 21 days after the accident, due to deep vein thrombosis caused by her injuries. Her death was witnessed by her daughter (who had not witnessed the accident itself). As a result, the daughter suffered significant post-traumatic stress (a psychiatric injury). At first instance, the judge held that she was entitled to claim damages as a "secondary victim" of the accident. The employer appealed, arguing that one of the requirements for recovery as a secondary victim had not been met in this case: namely, that she was either present at the scene of the accident which caused the death or was involved in its immediate aftermath. The Court of Appeal has now upheld that appeal.

In secondary victim cases, there is a need for "proximity" in the relationship between the claimant and the defendant and also for physical proximity in time and space to an event. These "control mechanisms" are intended to limit the number of persons who can claim damages. In this case, there had been one event (the original accident) which had had two consequences – the initial injury and the employee's death. If the judge's decision had been correct, the daughter would have been able to recover damages even if the death had occurred months, or even years, after the accident. The Court of Appeal said that that was stretching the concept of proximity too far, and that only Parliament should extend the scope of liability to secondary victims in this manner.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nigel Brook
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.