UK: Policy to Programme: Avoiding Risk in the Public Sector

Last Updated: 28 January 2004
Article by John Newton

As part of its agenda to modernise public services UK Government is proposing some very large IT-enabled change programmes. In his first of a series of white papers John Newton looks at the policy issues behind this and considers commercial techniques that could add value in helping Governments manage top-level policy risks.


The UK Government won the 2001 general election on a platform for modernisation of public services – health, schools, transport, welfare etc. The policy implied major investment in business transformation, the creation of new delivery structures and radical changes to the delivery mechanism – all underpinned by technology. Shortly after the election huge expenditures on IT related programmes were announced, for example:

  • Over €8bn* for "e-transformation" of Government services between 2003-2006
  • €3.5bn+ for massive IT updates in the National Health Service
  • Nearly €1.5bn for IT in the Criminal Justice Sector

Specific programmes include:

  • ASPIRE - a programme to transform the Inland Revenue (taxation) service
  • Health Local Service Provision – aiming to sign up five IT services groups to supply services to NHS on a region by region basis
  • Defence Information Infrastructure (DII) - the Ministry of Defence (MoD) programme to acquire new infrastructure and systems integration services.

Major policies still in discussion, such as an identity card scheme, will drive significant additional investment.

Having made its policy Government is now translating it into action – therefore its political future, at least in part, rests on delivering a portfolio of business and IT programmes to modernise public services.


As Peter Gershon points out in the referenced quote, will all this money really generate more effective and efficient services? Given the pubic sector’s poor reputation for delivery of business change and related IT projects should not Government be looking at using commercial techniques to help achieve success?

In this paper we consider the strategic emphasis of turning policy in to action and at techniques which can:

  • Improve decision making
  • Reduce the risk of failure
  • Improve effectiveness in delivery

All of which, if successful, will improve both Government’s execution of policy and its image.

Portfolio Management is a current "hot topic" for consultants and analysts which, in the private sector1 and in US government, is offering the potential for real rewards. Essentially Portfolio Management is about evaluating possible investments that can be made by an organisation and selecting those that offer the greatest return. In its current guise it is geared towards the commercial world.

In this paper we make the case that Portfolio Management can be adapted to help the public sector be better at both making and translating policy.


Making the transition from policy to delivery of services on the ground is a significant challenge. In Fujitsu we are developing models of processes in government. For example, Figure 1 below looks at the processes needed to take forward policy in a way that will achieve success in delivering IT based programmes. Consider:


Figure 1 – policy to outcome: Make-Translate-Deliver

Here we start in Make and follow the arrow round to take a view of how policy can come to be implemented, and how a political aspiration can translate itself to a measurable delivery outcome.

Make policy

This is policy initiation and development – which may require legislation. There are many influences - an election promise, response to public opinion, looking for the next election victory and so on.

Policy may also be driven by external, but planned, events such as trade agreements and internal cooperation against crime as well as the unexpected – conflict, famine etc.

In the real world some policies never leave the Make box – public opposition or defeat in parliament offer two reasons.

Policies can also be scrapped in development if there are real difficulties foreseen in implementation – but in many cases it is later in the process that these, potentially costly, issues arise. Governments need to have more effective review processes between Make and Translate to offer the chance to change policy before going forward.

Translate policy

In most governments once a policy has been decided it will be passed to a department or agency for implementation. The department’s main task is to try to turn the policy into a deliverable framework which can be passed down from the top of the department into the core business for delivery.

The department should have in place a business strategy that is, or can be, aligned with and facilitate its policy implementation task. Unfortunately this is not always the case and translation of policy into delivery can go dreadfully wrong. For example a department’s strategy could be based on decentralisation and devolution – which will not suit a "command and control" target-led approach. There is controversy in the UK at present as to whether the Department of Health and the Health Service are caught in this trap.

Recognising the problem, some parts of government in UK and elsewhere are starting to use tools such as Portfolio Management but the move through Translate to Deliver can still be fraught with risk because the problem may have arisen from poor decision-making in the Make process.

Also programme delivery is often carried out by those who were responsible for the policy translation – which does not provide the best perspective for an impartial approach to issues and risks.


The activities in this box are crucial to the successful outcome of a policy. The way in which citizens view delivery has a lot in common with the way customer service operations are perceived by customers of private companies. As with the private sector these citizens often hold negative views about the public sector. Therefore a poorly perceived delivery process can damage well-planned policy.

For example recent legislation in Britain requires anyone working with children to have a criminal record check carried out. Unfortunately delivery has not been wholly successful and the checking service is finding difficulty in meeting demand. As a consequence the policy aims have been put at risk through poor delivery.

High profile failures can therefore be caused by poor policy, poor implementation or poor perception of delivery. So to avoid these failures governments need to understand what they should not attempt to do, where they need to take care in implementation and how the results will be perceived.

So we ask - "if Make and Translate were done better then possibly Delivery would have a better chance of success?"


In this box reside all the fundamentals of doing the business of government – people, premises, IT infrastructure etc., usually within a single government department. This paper doesn’t look at risks and issues in this area, but a future one will.


In the UK, and no doubt elsewhere, a number of high profile public sector projects have "failed". Failure can cover the range from complete abandonment to inability to deliver the benefits originally claimed.

Popular perception is that most of these failures occur within the "IT" components of the programme. It is always easy to blame "the computer" and subsequently the contractor.

However, it is not always the civil servants or their IT services partners that are to blame. Rather, are the right questions being asked early enough?

  • Are policy objectives actually achievable?
  • Can the processes be made to work?
  • Can business requirements be met?
  • Does the policy offer real value?
  • Can we implement the IT components?
  • Is there a way of catching "unimplementable" policies early enough so that changes in translation can be made before hitting the delivery stage?
  • Is Government so consumed by the need for delivery that it’s not understanding policy and programme risks early enough?

Without budget or timescale pressures it might be possible to deploy enough resources to ensure that all these issues were tackled – but this is the real world. Government has to discover where the real opportunities, benefits and risks are to improve policymaking and delivery against the real constraints surrounding it.


First consider the issue of moving from Translate to Deliver – understanding the policy translation risk to help improve the chances of successful delivery.

A UK government body called Office of Government Commerce (OGC)2 provides support services for oversight of programmes and projects of all kinds – not just IT. OGC calls the stages of its review process "Gateways". When the process was originally introduced it focused mostly on the procurement stages for deliverables – the original Gateway stages were delivery based and (from a generic perspective) focused on:

  • Gateway 1: Business Justification – is there a business case supporting the programme or project?
  • Gateway 2: Procurement and Source of Supply – have the necessary tasks been done to obtain the resources for delivery?
  • Gateway 3: Investment Decision – given the above has been done, is it still wise to spend the money?
  • Gateway 4: Readiness for Service – post-development, is the project read to go?
  • Gateway 5: Benefits Evaluation – post-implementation, what benefits were achieved?

But were projects put through this scheme being reviewed early enough? In other words was the Translate risk being looked at before the delivery project started? Was the implication of a portfolio of interlinked work being look at sufficiently?

OGC has recognised this issue and introduced Gateway 0 – Strategic Assessment.

Gateway 0 focuses on the strategic needs of the delivery task itself. It aims to provide assurance to a management board that the business requirement has been adequately researched (in our terms that the Translate task has been completed effectively) and fits within a department’s overall business strategy – which also has the beneficial effect of discovering any flaws in that strategy. OGC also believes that that this review will capture how a portfolio of projects aims to deliver the overall objectives, and that management structure, monitoring and resourcing are appropriate.

In the context of this paper, then, Gateway 0 helps resolve some the issues raised earlier, for example the existence, or otherwise, of a departmental strategy able to rise to the delivery task given to it.


Gateway 0, both as an approach and a process, is relatively new but is catching on in central government programmes in the UK. Large agency programmes and even some local government developments are being covered too, often at the request of the organisation developing the programme itself.

Portfolio Management also provides sound and consistent criteria to get away from the "IT blame" culture by ensuring that delivery projects are aligned against the requirements from the Translate process.

But is this early enough?

In Fujitsu’s view, no. It is believed that there needs to be an even earlier review, Gateway "minus 1" one might call it, which can act as an iterative filter between the Make and Translate process in our model.

And in this, we believe, Portfolio Management can play a significant role.


Portfolio Management is an integrated set of processes, techniques and tools that when consistently applied to a portfolio of investments and programs allows for:

  • Selection of investments that have the greatest potential
  • Effective programme planning and execution to return the greatest possible value to the business
  • Ongoing governance and active management of the portfolio to ensure the required value is achieved.

As we noted previously it is mainly employed in the commercial sector but in this context let us consider government as a company:

  • Assume the Cabinet as the Board, the Prime Minister the CEO – the President the President – a federal structure might be more difficult to imagine but lets keep going.
  • Parliament (legislature – MPs, senators etc) and by proxy through the democratic system the people would be the shareholders.
  • Senior civil servants would be heads of departments or divisions, and so on down the chain.
  • Shareholder value could be measured through economic performance, law and order, quality of life, health and so on which is enhancing the quality of life of the population. Measures of performance could be things like detection rates for police forces, waiting times for operations, transport punctuality.

The last bullet is very important. Many companies and governments set targets only for things that can be measured easily. Portfolio Management can help aggregate and synthesise other measures for less tangible processes.

Whereas in the private sector Portfolio Management offers to "assist enterprises in selecting, executing and managing an optimum set of programs/investments (the portfolio) that allows them to minimise risk and maximise value to their organisation" we can write, for the public sector:

Portfolio Management can "assist governments in selecting, executing and managing an optimum set of policies (the portfolio) that allows them to minimise risk and maximise value to the state or communities within it"

Now consider the business drivers for Portfolio Management and map these to managing a government policy portfolio (as Figure 2):

Corporate space

Government space

Business and IT alignment:

Are the business needs and means of delivery aligned?

If not do we know what needs to be done to make it happen?

Business and IT alignment:

Is policy aligned with the capability of the public sector to deliver?

If not, do we know what needs to be done to make it happen?


Changes in the market, cost cutting, understanding spending, budgets held constant or limited increases.


Changes in demographics, the real economy, taxation, benefit (welfare) issues and so on.

Does the prospective portfolio effectively respond to Government macro- and micro-economic policies?

New strategic direction:

Diversification, making an acquisition, opening a new market.

Does the portfolio support the corporate vision?

New strategic direction:

Major policy changes, for example in support for industry or improvements in childcare.

Does the portfolio support the political vision?


Too many projects at once, difficulty in allocating priorities, project failures. Shortage of skilled resources. Managing a legacy environment whilst moving forward.

Has the business the capacity to do what it wants to do?


Too many projects at once, difficulty in allocating priorities, project failures. Shortage of skilled resources. Managing a legacy environment whilst moving forward.

Is Translate to Delivery hampered by departments just having too much work to do?

Compelling external events:

Merger/acquisition, new CEO, rapid change in external environment, outsourcing

Compelling external events:

Change of Government, ministerial changes, war or perhaps an Olympic Games.

Figure 2: Are government issues analogous to corporate ones?

From the above the conclusion is that the "commercial" to "government" mapping fits well if "policies" (or outcomes) are substituted for "investments" and the appropriate changes are made to the value measurements.


Below are the considerations for obtaining successful outcomes in the public sector:

  • Governments could tackle the issues surrounding policy making, translation and delivery through use of commercial techniques – in this example Portfolio Management.
  • The main challenge facing governments and the public sector in the electronic era is being able to make and implement policy to enable effective delivery.
  • Government is generally getting to grips with project and programme management issues but needs to get smart in the "policy-making factory" and sort out problems there as early as possible before entering the delivery space.
  • Techniques such as Portfolio Management could prove valuable as a robust means of filtering policy portfolios.

In conclusion Fujitsu believes that it’s rarely the technology that causes a government programme to fail but rather that political, economic and social risks can be the overriding factors. The application of commercial analysis techniques to high-level government could help to mitigate these risk areas. Use of these ideas could help government:

  • Gain the confidence to manage a range of disparate projects across boundaries with multiple stakeholders, achieving known benefits and outcomes.
  • Sensibly prioritise and select those aspects of the policies and programmes that will deliver the greatest impact to society.
  • Move from a project-oriented perspective to a view of implementing change through a balanced policy portfolio.


*. All costs in Euro. €1.40=GB£1=US$1.60

1. Coca-Cola, AT&T, US Federal Government

2. See

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions