UK: Corporation Tax Reform and Life Companies

Last Updated: 20 August 2003

On 12 August the Inland Revenue published the second consultation document on the reform of corporation tax (following on from the August 2002 publication).

The consultation document proposes the next steps in relation to:

  • enhancing the role of commercial accounts in the calculation of tax liabilities and abolition/reform of the schedular system
  • distinction between investment and trading companies
  • taxation of capital assets

The consultation documents also set out proposals for reform of the rules on transfer pricing and thin capitalisation. This article highlights the issues raised by the publication in so far as they are particularly relevant to life insurers.


The stated objectives of the contemplated reforms include greater coherence, transparency and flexibility. However the discussions which followed the 23 December 2002 press release "Making taxation of life insurance companies fairer" showed that the current system for taxing life companies is far from displaying these features.

Moreover, there is an allusion to possible structural reform of life taxation - the Government say at A.59 of Background Note A that the I minus E regime may change "as a result of various pressures on the system". It is assumed that the pressures referred to are the combination of accounting and regulatory change which is likely to revolutionise the way in which life companies report their financial results.

Implicit in the allusion is the assumption that the structural change would mean that the I minus E system is dismantled. The natural question arising from this assumption is why time should be spent on amending a system which has no shelf life.

The Inland Revenue pre-empt this concern by pointing out that transitional rules would probably require a survival of the I minus E system for business written prior to the date of change.

This is not an altogether convincing rationale to justify a wholesale change to the I minus E system, involving significant redrafting of complex legislation, followed by abolition of that system.

The underlying concern is more likely to be that a move to gross roll-up is yoked to the timetable of the international accounting standard on insurance contracts, which is something of a long game. If the FTSE has turned about and started upon an ascent, significant unrealised gains might arise on assets backing existing business and on new business written between now and a move to gross roll-up.

Reform of the schedular system

The Government is considering various options for reform of the schedular system. The main driver for change is increasing reliance on the accounting profit as the basis for calculating taxable profit, which is scarcely compatible with a schedular system.

The main shortcomings of the current schedular system are perceived to lie in the inflexible and intricate rules regarding the use that can be made of losses (which, incidentally, appear to discourage UK companies from investing outside the UK). Two main methods are canvassed for a new, non-schedular, basis of corporate taxation.

In short they are:

  • pooling of trading and property income
  • full pooling

A preference seems to emerge for the former. Currently, life insurance companies are generally taxed on the I minus E basis on profits other than the shareholder profits from pension, ISA, overseas life assurance, life reinsurance and permanent health business. The I minus E profits therefore comprise income and capital gains from real property and other investments within the life fund. The latter are computed on Case I principles but taxed under Case VI, the profits from each category of business being seen as arising from a separate Case I or Case VI source.

Pooling of a life company’s trading income (which typically is a shareholder matter) with its property income (typically an I minus E matter because the property is normally an asset of the life fund) would appear not to be possible for the purposes of I minus E.

It is not clear that such a change would, therefore, make any significant difference to the existing regime so far as the I minus E tax is concerned.

The Inland Revenue envisage that a move to full pooling would require a significant re-write of the I minus E rules, probably with reference to the legislation as it stood in Australia or New Zealand, both of which historically operated I minus E regimes similar to that in the UK but on a non-schedular basis.

The consultative document raises the possibility that it might become appropriate to reduce the number of computations to just two – a modified I minus E for BLAGAB (inclusive of the shareholder/trading profit attributable to BLAGAB) and the shareholder/trading profit computation for business other than BLAGAB (the latter possibly including PHI). This might permit the offset of losses of one of the current shareholder/trading profit Case I/VI categories against profits of another. Currently there is strict ring fencing between the categories. Life insurance companies would welcome such a change.

The Government state that this would also bring an end to most of the complex rules for overseas life assurance business. In addition, life insurance companies would welcome the ability to carry back expenses of management (within the I minus E computation) and Case VI losses to the previous year.

Expenses of management

In the light of the consultation on the distinction between trading and investment companies (and, no doubt, recent case-law) the Government appears to be concerned about the way the law is developing with regard to expenses of management and the basis on which they are relieved. These concerns extend to life companies.

Specifically the main concerns in the life company context are that currently the deduction for management expenses is to be taken for the year for which the expenses are "disbursed" rather than as reflected in the profit and loss account, and the rules for identifying management expenses diverge (at least on paper) from those applicable to trading expenses.

Some reform may therefore be proposed to align the definition and treatment of such expenses more closely with those of trading expenses.

Life insurance companies would welcome a "business expenses" rule which should ensure that a deduction is obtained for expenses which would be deductible on Case I principles but are not deductible in the I minus E computation, although they are incurred for the business, because they do not qualify as expenses of management, and vice versa.

The Government are also considering relaxation of the restrictions on the substantial shareholdings rules as they apply to investment companies.

If such relaxations are implemented, life companies are likely to wish to see a reduction in the current 30% holding condition for shares held in the long term insurance fund. This wish will be intensified if equity holdings are to be taxed on an accounts basis (see below).

Taxation of capital assets (I minus E)

Despite mixed feedback on consultation on the taxation of capital assets, the Government still intends to replace the current chargeable gains regime with rules that align more closely to the accounting treatment.

The key aspects of the proposals are (besides use of accounts as the starting point for the taxation of capital assets):

  • Abolition of indexation relief
  • Further debate on the issue of deductions for capital

There has been much discussion about the treatment of unrealised gains, which pass through a life company’s accounts but not through the I minus E computation. So far as real property is concerned, the Government appears content to allow gains to remain untaxed until realised, as now. However this is not true of shareholdings not qualifying for substantial shareholdings relief, which it is intended shall be taxed on an accounts basis. The main impact of these proposals for life companies would be that they would be taxed on unrealised gains on their portfolio equity holdings on an accounts basis.

Life insurance companies make a very large proportion of the UK’s capital gains. The potential increase in annual tax charges, required systems changes and the effect of volatility of equity returns means that it would be unfair to life companies and their policyholders to tax the gains on an accounts basis.

(Although the I minus E basis is usually thought of as taxation of the policyholder by proxy, capital gains in a life fund are generally much less kindly treated than gains accruing to individuals on assets directly held. The Government has launched a pre-emptive strike against any argument that the proposed reform should be used as an opportunity to re-align the two bases of taxation, by pointing out that they already diverge substantially – not perhaps the best of arguments to support further divergence!)

The potential unfairness has been recognised in the consultative document, to the extent of putting forward three options:

  • Exclude all remaining capital assets (i.e. assets not taxed within an income regime e.g. loan relationships, intangibles, financial instruments) from the new rules
  • Exclude policyholder share from new rules
  • Include all the remaining capital assets within the new rules but adjust the rate of corporation tax on the policyholders share to reflect the new rules

Life companies are likely to prefer that capital assets be excluded from the rules. Any major changes to the life tax regime should not be introduced as part of a wider reform of corporation tax but as a result of separate debate on the scheme of life insurance tax.

If such a system is introduced, it is difficult to comprehend why there should be any limitation on the use of other "losses" (e.g. loan relationship deficits) against unrealised equity gains, or the use of unrealised equity losses against other I minus E income.

The coherence of the system would require that if the "upside" is fully taxable as income, then the "downside" is fully deductible as expense. The way in which the loan relationships rules were implemented for life insurance companies is a good model for an accounts-based taxation of equities.

Need for discrete debate

However, the debate generated by a move in this direction would be likely to put some urgency into discussions about the future of the life tax system, and whether it is time for a move to a gross roll-up regime.

Central to, or even the driver to, such debate is the taxation of policyholders, and the creation of a level playing field for life products and other forms of investment. Although the Sandler report recommendations on the reform of policyholder taxation were not taken forward as part of the 2003 budget process, it was expected that the recommendations would be considered further within the context of regulatory and accounting changes and the reform of corporation tax. The representation process is likely to act as a catalyst for this debate.

The consultation document and background notes The consultation document is available on the Inland Revenue website at:

By Ross Fraser and Lindsay J'Afari-Pak

© Herbert Smith 2003

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions