UK: Lords Committee - Some Movement On Infrastructure Amendments

Last Updated: 11 February 2013
Article by Angus Walker

Today's entry reports on the House of Lords' consideration of the infrastructure amendments to the Growth and Infrastructure Bill.

Yesterday, the fourth and penultimate day of the committee stage for the Growth and Infrastructure Bill took place in the House of Lords, which covered proposed amendments to the infrastructure-related clauses. The current version of the bill can be found here, and the amendments can be found here. The debate can be found here, but as ever, here is a summary.

In short, three minor technical government amendments were accepted and none others were, but there were signals that the government might take action on a couple of them, whether by amending the bill later or otherwise.

One stop shop

For the government, Lord Ahmad resisted the amendment to replace outside bodies' veto over including their consents in a development consent order (DCO) with consultation, saying that this would require duplication of existing expertise within bodies such as the Environment Agency (EA) with new expertise within the Planning Inspectorate (PINS), and that bodies such as the EA and Natural England (NE) had an important role to play to considering applications.

I would answer that the argument misses the point.  The EA and NE do have an important role to play but can still play it if their consents are contained in the main DCO.  The duplication of expertise point contradicts the government's own guidance that bodies should have good reason to exercise their vetoes (see paragraph 19), which would require PINS to have the expertise should the vetoes not be exercised.  As far as I am aware PINS do have that expertise anyway.

The figure of 40% of consents being outside the Planning Act regime was used a couple of times, with Sir Mike Pitt given as the originator of this remark.  He didn't actually say that (I was there), he said that for one particular application, 60 out of 100 consents were able to be included in the DCO, and 40 weren't, rather than anything more general.


Lord Ahmad promised that a statutory instrument (SI) would be brought forward to amend the fees regulations to make them clearer.  He and Lord Adonis for Labour clashed on the content of such an SI, with Lord Ahmad appearing to say it would clarify the number of inspectors.  Lord Ahmad said that he would write to Lord Adonis before the next stage (report stage, 27 February) on the point.

Lord Ahmad also said the following on fees: 'These fees are intended to cover the work of the Planning Inspectorate, which supports the examination, including staff working in case management, case administration, environmental services, legal services and other relevant costs of the inspectorate, including those incurred during the recommendation stage, for which no separate fee is charged.'  Any costs not met by the applicant were met by the taxpayer, he said.

I suspect the SI will change the definition of the fee to mean each working day during the examination.  That would confirm the higher fee for applications going forward, but wouldn't deal with applications already examined.

National Policy Statements (NPSs)

On the amendment to produce the remaining NPSs by 2015, Lord Ahmad seemed to speak both for and against them.  On the one hand he said that NPSs remained central to government planning reforms, that the hazardous waste NPS would be designated this spring, and that "The Department for Communities and Local Government continues to work closely with colleagues in the Department for Transport to work towards roads and rail and aviation national policy statements in future."

On the other hand, he said "it is clear that the nationally significant infrastructure regime can operate effectively and quickly without the need for a national policy statement, as we have seen, for example, with the decision on the Ipswich rail chord."

On the third hand, when Lord Berkeley asked that consideration of rail and water freight be a requirement for applications, the response was that "decisions on nationally significant infrastructure projects must be taken in accordance with national policy statements, where they exist".  So they do have some use, after all!

All in all, I still detect some diffidence from the government on infrastructure NPSs.

Later in the debate there was an amendment about NPSs for business and commercial projects. Baroness Hanham said that the government's preference was not to have any, but they were considering responses to the consultation on the issue that closed last month and would come back on it, although she wouldn't promise that this would be before the next stage of the bill.

She said that when making decisions, the Secretary of State already had to take into account "other matters he considers both important and relevant. This could include the local plan and the National Planning Policy Framework", (that little word 'could' won't be very popular) adding that "The reason that I have said the national planning statement is not being looked at with favour for building commercial is simply because the expectation is that it will be of very little use and that there are other documents and evidence that will be good enough to help in this matter."  Calling it a national planning statement is a bit of a Freudian slip - it does have a wider purpose.

Waivers and pre-application oversight

Lord Ahmad resisted procedural waivers on the ground that they would "potentially undermine the certainty and transparency of the regime."  That seems a bit of an overstatement, considering that they are in place for the Transport and Works Act 1992 regime.

He also used the government's current work on the one stop shop as an excuse for not introducing pre-application oversight or waivers, but to me those two issues aren't really 'one stop shop' issues.

Certification offence

Earl Lytton pressed for the removal of the offence of wilfully or recklessly getting wrong the certification that everyone had been served with acceptance of the application.  Lord Ahmad yielded a little, saying he would welcome further evidence on the effect of that provision.


Earl Attlee for the government (there was a bit of a relay race of ministers) agreed to look further at the amendment to release tolling in a DCO from having to be of the tollbooth plaza type, so I think we can expect a government amendment on that later.  Lord Berkeley said that he was sure it would be better than his one.  Huh.

There was an amusing exchange when Lord Snape said that tollbooths were a mediaeval practice and should be abolished along with other mediaeval practices. Lord Adonis cautioned that doing so might involve the abolition of the House of Lords. Ex-MP Lord Snape retorted that at least he had been elected occasionally.

Special parliamentary procedure (SPP)

Lord Greenway asked that on his amendment about reinstating SPP for port and railway land that he was merely seeking an assurance about the importance of port land, which he got, as well as a mention of a letter from ports minister Stephen Hammond about safeguarding port land.

Rookery DCO committee member Lord Faulkner conducted a spirited defence of SPP, but it fell on deaf ears. He asked whether in the case of Rookery South, judicial review would have taken longer than SPP (presumably seeking the answer that it would have done).  That is not entirely relevant since SPP is not a substitute for JR.  Lord Ahmad gave a rather technical and impenetrable response (my way of saying I didn't understand it) about whether SPP should be restricted to the issue that triggered it or could consider the whole application.

To the amendment that only designated open space should be subject to SPP, Lord Ahmad said that preserving open space in the context of compulsory purchase involved different considerations from the context of deciding whether to designate it in some way.

Business and commercial projects

To the Labour amendment to specify the types of business and commercial project on the face of the Bill, Baroness Hanham said that this would be premature, given the recent consultation on the subject.

She said that she had provided a summary of the consultation responses to Lord Adonis, who retorted that the summary was 'a profound exercise in waffle' and did not help very much. 

For example in response to the question: "Do you agree with our assessment of the factors that the Secretary of State would need to take into accountwhen considering whether a project is nationally significant?", the summary said "A number of respondents thought the assessment factors were broadly right whilst others commented that they were not detailed enough or were not supported at all".  I see what he means.

What I did think was telling was that Baroness Hanham used the phrase 'national economic importance' in the context of the business and commercial projects that might use the regime.  Perhaps that might find its way into regulations or guidance.

Baroness Hanham resisted restricting applications for upgrading infrastructure projects to the applicant, saying that the difference with business and commercial projects was that the latter were optional while the former were compulsory, and so the latter shouldn't be forced by a third party.  In proposing the amendment, Lord Jenkin may have had a visit to the bar on his mind when he called the Infrastructure Planning Commission the IPA.

I think we all need a drink after ploughing through that lot.  As always with Parliamentary debates, however, there are a few nuggets of information that can be gleaned and Kremlinological nuances suggesting how the government is thinking.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Angus Walker
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.