UK: Privacy and Personality, Politicians and Stars

Last Updated: 17 June 2003

Article by Rohan Massey and Kathrin Tauber

One could be forgiven for thinking that the sanctity of marriage is one of the few things chancellor Gerhard Schröder of Germany and the Hollywood A-list couple Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones have in common, however, the recent cases that they have brought in Germany and the UK, respectively, highlight the approaches being taken in Europe towards the individual’s right to protect their privacy from unwanted media attention.

Germany and the UK have historically taken different paths on the development legal rights to protect individuals. Germany has followed the US approach of adopting a statutory personality right. The UK, on the other hand, has not legislated on privacy or personality instead it has seen the judicial development of the laws of confidence and data protection.

The current legal dilemma surrounding the issue of privacy in Europe has arisen because actions being brought in the courts of EU member states must be considered in light of the European Convention on Human Rights. In actions regarding an individual’s privacy there is often a need to balance Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which grants the right to respect for private and family life, and Article 10, which grants the right to freedom of expression.

Personality Right?

In Germany the personality right is a statutory right granted in section 1 para. 1 and section 2 para. 1 of the German Constitution (Grundgesetz). The German right is a broad one, granting the individual the right to control the development and exploitation of his own personality, with different levels of protection being given to the individual, private and intimate aspects of a person’s life. Any illegal interference with the personality right entitles the individual to seek compensation and, where necessary, an injunction according to sections 823 and 1004 of the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch).

For a claim of infringement of the personality right to be successful there has to be comprehensive consideration of the parties’ affected interests. This is achieved by comparing the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of speech and the personality right of the offended. This balance is weighed on the facts of the case. It should be noted that the balance is subjective with the German courts generally lowering the threshold of protection from media intrusion granted to individuals in the public eye. This subjective determination of protection does not signify a wholesale removal of public figure’s right to privacy, merely a limitation of it.

Chancellor Gerhard Schröder recently took advantage of the personality right by bringing an action in the Lower Regional Court of Düsseldorf against a newspaper that had published an article reporting rumors relating to the state of the Chancellor’s marriage. The newspaper made clear that it was not reporting a factual story on the state of the Chancellor’s marriage, but merely that rumours were circulating in Germany that the Schröders had apparently been involved in a public fight and that the Chancellor had spent several nights away from his home in Hannover.

The court balanced the arguments of the information being of public interest, as argued by the newspaper, against the personal interests of the Chancellor. Based on the facts of the case, and as the newspaper was not holding the story out as fact but reporting rumour, it was held that the Chancellor’s private life was of public interest. In particular the court recognized the fact that media reporting prior to this case did not include specific private details about the Chancellor’s marriage disputes. Such information would have been important in this case, as Chancellor Schröder campaigned by promoting his family life during the 2002 election. The court held that the press was allowed to report on the Chancellor’s family life to the extent that it was made public, i.e., that he was married, though the press did not have the right to report on intimate details or specific details of his marriage that Chancellor Schröder had not previously made public.

Confidence in the UK?

As there is no statutory protection of privacy in the UK the recent case brought by Catherine Zeta-Jones and Michael Douglas has been seen as something of a watershed between the current system of trying to protect privacy using a combination of the common law of confidence and a combination of other legislation, such as the Data Protection Act, and the introduction of a statutory right to privacy similar to that in Germany.

The November 2000 wedding of Catherine Zeta-Jones and Michael Douglas, which was a closely guarded and nominally private affair, was billed as the event of the year and the couple arranged a £1 million deal with OK! magazine for exclusive rights to publish pictures of the wedding. Hello! magazine, a rival of OK!’s, managed to obtain and publish unauthorised photographs of the couple‘s wedding prior to the publication of Hello!’s exclusive.

The Douglases were both furious and upset feeling that their privacy had been breached. The action they brought against Hello! was based on the fact that despite commercialising the wedding by selling their photos they had taken extreme and expensive measures to ensure that the wedding itself and the photographs of it were private.

Initially the case appeared to favour the pro-privacy law lobby as the Douglases were granted an injunction against Hello! to prevent it publishing the unauthorised photographs. Then, the court of appeal overturned the injunction. Sedley L J alluded to the point that as Parliament had not introduced a law of privacy in light of the coming into force of the Human Rights Act, and need to do so. Almost three years on from the injunction being overturned Parliament has failed to act upon the Sedly L J’s comments and it fell to Mr Justice Lindsay in the High Court to rule on the matter.

At trial, the High Court found in favour of the Douglases. However, the judgment was not based on a law of privacy but, based on the specific facts of the case, by relying on long established principles of the law of confidence. In being able to grant rights to publish pictures, the Douglases had a commodity, the value of which depended upon it being kept secret and then made public in a controlled way. Any unauthorised publication would be a breach of commercial confidence. Put simply, all photographs of the wedding were deemed to be confidential information. The unauthorised photographs of the wedding were a disclosure of information that was protected by confidence and the publication by Hello! of the unauthorised photographs was a breach of confidence.

Unfortunately for the pro-privacy law lobby the judgment avoided creating a law of privacy, as the judge felt that the arguments for the existence of a free-standing right of privacy had not been made. The justification for such a right depends, arguably, on English law being so inadequate that individual rights to private and family life are not properly protected. In this case such an inadequacy could not be demonstrated, and the common law breach of confidence was sufficient to both protect the Douglases and to provide them with adequate remedy.

However, the judiciary again commented on the need for Parliament to determine the ramifications of recognising a wide right of privacy and legislate accordingly, adding that if Parliament could not, or would not, act on the issue of a law of privacy then in future cases where the facts do not allow for determination under the laws of confidence, or other ill-suited legislation, then the judiciary may be forced to so.

Despite Germany having a statutory law of privacy and the UK relying on the common law the results of the recent cases detailed above mirror each other. The issue now in the UK is whether Parliament will follow Germany’s lead and legislate on privacy before an individual brings a successful claim for breach of privacy which does not fall within the current definitions of breach of confidence thereby forcing the judiciary to create a new law of privacy.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions