ARTICLE
18 December 2012

RIDDOR - To Report Or Not To Report?

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
A consultation has been launched by the Health and Safety Executive ("HSE") which aims to simplify and improve the reporting requirements under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995 ("RIDDOR").
United Kingdom Employment and HR

A consultation has been launched by the Health and Safety Executive ("HSE") which aims to simplify and improve the reporting requirements under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995 ("RIDDOR"). The scheme is in response to a recommendation in Professor Löfstedt's report last year that ambiguity over reporting requirements should be removed.

The changes will remove the duty to report in cases where the information would be of little use or better collected through other means, effectively reducing the burden on businesses. Indeed, a cost benefit analysis included in the consultation document suggests there will be a combined cost saving to the Government and businesses of £1.8 million per year.

What are the aims?

The aim of the proposals is to allow businesses to only provide as much information as they need and to make it easier for them to comply with health and safety law.

The key objectives are:

  • To ensure that enforcing authorities are notified of serious, individual incidents
  • To ensure that there is sufficient information for the enforcing authorities to act in a risk-based manner
  • To simplify the language of the reporting requirements
  • To provide clear guidance on what needs to be reported and by what time

The proposals

The HSE plans to simplify the reporting requirements of the following incidents:

  • All major injuries to people at work
  • Domestic gas events

The HSE plans to remove the reporting requirements of the following incidents:

  • The reporting by self-employed persons of injuries or illness to themselves
  • The majority of occupational disease cases
  • Non-fatal accidents to members of the public (except for domestic gas-related incidents)
  • Incidents reportable under the Electricity Safety, Quality and Continuity Regulations 2002
  • Dangerous occurrences that happen outside of higher risk sectors or activities; and
  • Incidents relating to the transport of dangerous goods by road and rail

It should be noted that businesses will still be required to report all fatal injuries (whether to workers or to members of the public) and all major injuries to workers.

The implications

The consultation closed on 28 October 2012 and the proposals are anticipated to come into effect next year. If the above plans are fully implemented, businesses should see a reduction in the administrative burden, particularly for minor injuries. Such changes would be a continuation of the Government's plan to change the face of health and safety law over the next few years.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More