UK: OHIM v Wrigley Jr Company C – Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs

Last Updated: 13 May 2003
Article by Julian Ward

Proceedings to date

In March 1996 Wrigley applied to OHIM for registration of the word DOUBLEMINT as a community trade mark for goods (including chewing gum) in several classes. The office refused the application by virtue of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94, holding that the trade mark consisted "exclusively of the word DOUBLEMINT, which may serve in trade to designate the characteristics of the goods".

This decision was reversed in September 1999 by the CFI which held that the word DOUBLEMINT is not "exclusively descriptive". It found that the word "Double" is unusual when compared with other English words such as ‘much’, "strong", "extra", "best" or "finest", and that when combined with the word "mint", it has two distinct meanings for the potential consumer: "twice as much mint" or "flavoured with two different varieties of mint". The CFI also found that the word DOUBLEMINT has numerous other possible meanings, and that this would be apparent to the average English-speaking consumer, thus depriving the mark of any descriptive function for the purposes of Article 7(1)(c). Finally, the CFI held that the word DOUBLEMINT, when applied to the goods, has an ambiguous and suggestive meaning and does not enable the public immediately and without further reflection to detect any e description of the characteristics of the goods.

On 20 April 2001, OHIM lodged an appeal against this decision.

The case law – Windsurfing Chiemsee and Baby-Dry

Advocate General Jacobs deals in detail with the relationship between the decision of the CFI in DOUBLEMINT and the Windsurfing Chiemsee and Baby-Dry cases.

Windsurfing Chiemsee was precluded from registration, under Article 3(1)(c) of the European Trade Mark Directive (89/104), on the ground that the mark serves as a designation of geographical origin.

In Baby-Dry, the ECJ said that the purpose of Article 7(1)(c) of the Regulation was to prevent registration of signs or indications which, because they were no different from the usual way of designating the relevant goods or services, could not fulfil the function of identifying the undertaking that markets them. The combination of the descriptive words might still be distinctive if it was not used in common parlance.

The Advocate General’s opinion

Advocate General Jacobs’ opinion highlights two flaws in the CFI’s decision in DOUBLEMINT. First the CFI held that Doublemint could not be characterised as "exclusively descriptive", so should not have been refused for that reason. However the Advocate General points out that in Article 7(1)(c) the word "exclusively" qualifies the word "consists" and so there will be reason for refusal where every element has at least one possible descriptive use.

Secondly the CFI approach implies that where there are multiple possible meanings the mark cannot be descriptive. Jacobs notes this is wrong as a general principle, and contrary to the approach adopted by the CFI itself in the Daimler Chrysler case where the CFI stated that in order to bring Article 7(1)(c) into operation it is sufficient that one of a number of possible meanings is descriptive.

Jacobs then considers the meaning of "descriptiveness". He suggests there is a clear line to be drawn between terms used to "designate" the characteristics of products (in the language of Article 7(1)(c) ) and terms which are merely suggestive of such characteristics, although where the line lines is a matter of judgment in each case.

Jacobs proposes a non-exclusive three-part test: (i) first consider the way in which a term relates to the product or one of its characteristics. The more factual and objective the relationship, the more likely it is that the term will be used in trade as a designation of the goods or their characteristics; (ii) consider how down to earth the term is and how immediately any descriptive message will be conveyed; and, (iii) consider the importance of the characteristic described by the term to the product: if the characteristic is essential to the product or particularly important to a consumer’s choice then the case for refusing registration is strong.

Jacobs then goes on to consider two points relating to the Baby-Dry case.

Wrigley argued both at first instance and on appeal that the term DOUBLEMINT is not to be found in dictionaries but is Wrigley’s own "lexical invention". Further, that like "Baby-Dry", DOUBLEMINT has an elliptical nature, an unusual structure and a resistance to any intuitive grammatical analysis. Jacobs stresses that while these elements should be taken into account in assessing the registerability of a mark, their mere presence should not automatically mean registration be granted. In any event, Jacobs notes these features are considerably less marked in DOUBLEMINT than in Baby-Dry. In particular, unlike Baby-Dry there is no inversion of the usual word order. While DOUBLEMINT may be absent from dictionaries, "the degree of lexical invention deployed in its creation was essentially limited to removing the space between the two words, which may well be used together descriptively".

The other, perhaps more telling point on the Baby-Dry case relates to the suggestion by the ECJ that "any perceptible difference between the combination of words submitted for registration and the terms used in the common parlance … is apt to confer distinctive character on the word combination …". Jacobs highlights that it would be helpful for the Court to clarify what it meant by "any perceptible difference", noting that there is a difference between "perceptible" and "minimal". In terms of form, a perceptible difference is one where the combined word is more important than the sum of its parts. In terms of meaning, a difference will be perceptible if the meaning evoked by the combined word is different to the sum of what is suggested by the descriptive components.

Jacobs concludes that the direct application of the test should mean that a mark is accepted for registration only when it is apparent to both traders and consumers that as a whole it is not suitable, in the ordinary language of trade, as a description of the characteristics of the product in question.

Jacobs then considers three additional points brought up the submissions.

Firstly, he deals with the suggestion that it is incorrect to look at the English language mark solely through the eyes of an English-speaking consumer. He notes that where an application is made to register a trade mark which consists of terms drawn from a language used in trade in the community, the first stage of the assessment under Article 7(1)(c) must be from the standpoint of a native speaker of the language concerned. If at this stage it is clear that the terms may be used in trade to designate characteristics of the relevant products, it is not necessary to consider the position of speakers of other languages.

Jacobs recognises that it may be necessary in some cases for a sign consisting in terms drawn from one language to be assessed through the eyes of a community consumer whose language is different, although it would be "inappropriate to take as a yardstick a consumer struggling with an imperfect knowledge of a foreign language".

Jacobs then considers the suggestion that the Baby-Dry case makes it easier for trade mark owners to monopolize descriptive terms and move away from the principle set out in Windsurfing Chiemsee, that descriptive signs and indications should be freely available to be used by all traders in relation to relevant goods. Jacobs recognizes that in the real world a defence under Article 12(b) might be worth rather less then its ostensible value in law, and that proceedings can have a chilling effect where the outcome is uncertain; however he states that the Baby-Dry case does not shift the balance in favour of trade mark owners and does not depart from the view set out in Windsurfing Chiemsee that it is in the public interest that descriptive signs may be freely used by all.


We wait to see whether the ECJ will adopt the reasoning set out in the Attorney General’s opinion. Thereafter it will remain to be seen whether Wrigleys has a further argument based on Article 7(3), which was not considered in this case.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.