UK: Double Jeopardy And European Patents

Last Updated: 27 March 2003
Article by Neil Thomson

A recent EPO decision has challenged the conventional exclusion on double patenting. Neil Thomson asks where the decision leaves EPO practice, and what impact it will have on proceedings in the UK.

"It is an accepted principle in most patent systems that two patents shall not be granted to the same applicant for one invention" (Guidelines for Examination at the EPO, C-IV, 6.4)".

Or is it? A recent Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) has considered whether there is any legal basis for the above practice and, for a specific set of facts, concluded that there is not.

Technical Board of Appeal Decision T587/98

In the case appealed, the applicant Komag Inc filed a European application EP 91115600.8, claim 1 of which related to, inter alia, a structure comprising three layers in addition to a substrate: namely, a first dielectric layer formed on said substrate, a magneto-optic (recording) layer formed on said dielectric layer and a second dielectric layer formed on said magneto-optic layer.

Subsequently, a divisional application EP 95100700.4, was filed, the main claim of which claimed at least two layers in addition to the substrate: namely a recording layer which may be an optical or a magneto-optical layer, and a dielectric layer which may be formed either on the recording layer or between it and the substrate.

Denoting the combination of substrate, first dielectric layer and recording layer as 'A' and the second dielectric layer as 'B', the parent effectively claimed 'A' with 'B', while the divisional claimed just 'A'(implicitly with or without 'B').

At first instance the Examining Division of the EPO refused the divisional application since, in their view, the claims conflicted with those of the parent application. The decision was based on the Guidelines for Examination which state:

C-IV, 6.4 "The Convention does not deal explicitly with the case of co-pending European applications of the same effective date. However, it is an accepted principle in most patent systems that two patents shall not be granted to the same applicant for one invention. It is permissible to allow an applicant to proceed with two applications having the same description where the claims are distinct in scope and directed to different inventions. However, in the rare case in which there are two or more European applications from the same applicant ... and the claims of those applications have the same priority date and relate to the same invention ... the applicant should be told that he must either amend one or more of the applications in a manner that they no longer claim the same invention, or choose which one of those applications he wishes to proceed to grant."

C-VI,9.6 "The parent and divisional applications may not claim the same subject-matter (See IV, 6.4). This means not only that they must not contain claims of substantially identical scope, but also that one application must not claim the subject-mater claimed in the other, even in different words. The difference between the claimed subject-matter of the two applications must be clearly distinguishable. As a general rule, however, one application may claim its own subject-matter in combination with that of the other application. In other words, if the parent and divisional applications claim separate and distinct elements 'A' and 'B' respectively which function in combination, one of the two applications may also include a claim for 'A' plus 'B' ".

The applicant appealed the refusal. The applicant argued that a ban on "double patenting" had no basis in the European Patent Convention and that in any case the claims of the parent and divisional were not for "the same invention".

In T587/98 a Board of Appeal observed that Article 125 of the EPC allows the EPO to take account of the principles of procedural law generally recognized in the contracting states where there is an absence of procedural provisions in the European Patent Convention. However, the Board concluded (reversing the previous decision) that the "institution of a divisional patent" was a matter for substantive law rather than a matter of procedure. Thus, the Board concluded that the practice laid down by the EPC relating to divisional applications is "self-contained and complete".

In view of the above, the Board went on to conclude that in the specific case of parent and divisional applications there is no express or implicit provision in the EPC which prohibits the presence in a divisional application of "an independent claim which is related to an independent claim in the parent application in such a way that the 'parent' claim includes all the features of the 'divisional' claim combined with an additional feature". However, the Board was careful not to reach any conclusions with wider applicability to the case of "double-patenting". What are the implications of this decision? As acknowledged by the Board itself, it is possible that there will be a proliferation of divisional applications all with overlapping scopes. As a result, third parties may face 'double jeopardy' - simultaneously infringing multiple patents - all of which have originated from a single filing.

Impact of Decision T587/98 in the UK

What impact will the Decision have in the UK? Article 139(3) EPC states:

"Any contracting state may prescribe whether and on what terms an invention disclosed in both a European patent application or patent and a national application or patent having the same date of filing, or where priority is claimed, the same date of priority, may be protected simultaneously by both applications or patents".

The UK Patents Act 1977 has exercised this power through the wording of Section 73(2), as amended, to deal with conflicting European (UK) and national UK patents:

"If it appears to the Comptroller that a patent under this Act and a European patent (UK) have been granted for the same invention having the same priority date and that the applications for the patents were filed by the same applicant or his successor in title...the Comptroller shall revoke the patent [under this Act]".

The clear intention of Section 73(2) was explained by the Court of Appeal in Marley's Patent ([1994]) RPC 231) where it was held that the correct construction of subsection (2) is the literal one. Balcombe LJ held:

It seems to me that the obvious purpose of [Section 73(2)] is to enable the Comptroller to prevent there being in existence two patents for the same invention, having the same priority date and where the applications for both patents were filed by the same applicant, and this is irrespective of the fact that other linked inventions may be included in the claims of either patent. The existence in these circumstances of concurrent patents for the same invention would not only be administratively undesirable, but could result in a defendant who has successfully defeated a claim for infringement of one patent being threatened with proceedings for infringement of the other in relation to the same activities. If the construction adopted by the judge - that the purpose of Section 73(2) is to prevent the similarity, but not the overlapping, of monopolies - were correct it would always be possible to circumvent operation of the sub-section by including in the claims of one patent two linked inventions (I1 and I2), but to include in the claim of the other patent only one of the inventions (I1).

Further, Section 18(5) of the Patents Act 1977 prevents two national UK patents being granted for the same invention having the same priority date and applicant.

It is clear that the EPO Board's definition of "the same invention" and "conflicting claims" as contained in the Guidelines for Examination is significantly different to the UK Courts' interpretation of the same terms as applied to the Patents Act 1977.

The UK Patents Act contains clear rules regarding conflict between two national UK applications and between UK national and European (UK) patents. But what happens in the case where both patents are European (UK) patents? Section 18(5) is limited to applications under the 1977 Act, and in any case refers only to pre-grant applications. Section 73(2) refers only to conflict between European (UK) and national UK patents. In addition, the Comptroller's powers are limited to revocation of the national patent; no action can be taken against a European (UK) patent. As such, it would appear that the Comptroller has no power to revoke one of two European (UK) patents resulting from two European patents granted further to two applications prosecuted through the European Patent Office.


The Decision T587/98 has called into question whether the double patenting exclusion of most patent systems is an exclusion that can be found in the European Patent Convention. For a particular set of facts one EPO Board of Appeal ruled that two patents with overlapping claims could be granted in a parent application and an application divided therefrom.

The United Kingdom patent law appears to have no provisions preventing the enforcement of two European (UK) patents with overlapping claims resulting from a single parent application. Thus the situation considered undesirable by Balcombe, LJ in Marley's Patent could apply in the United Kingdom after all and a defendant may face the double jeopardy of infringing two patents granted with overlapping claims for a single invention.

© 2001. Boult Wade Tennant

This article was first published in the April 2001 issue of Managing Intellectual Property.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.