UK: Case Law Update: Other Local Authority Litigated Claims

Last Updated: 18 September 2012
Article by Sue Howes

Employers' liability - poolside high chair – defective equipment - slip

Deeley v Dudley MBC (2012) - Birmingham County Court

Facts - during the course of his employment, a lifeguard at a local leisure centre stepped from the rungs of a poolside highchair on to the platform at the top of the highchair, causing the lifeguard to fall.

The platform should have had two metal screws in the side securing it to the chair. It was accepted by the Defendant that the screws were not in place at the time of the accident but it was denied that the platform could move because three out of its four sides wrapped around the highchair metal frame.

Findings - judgment for the Defendant:

  • The platform was very difficult to move. The lack of two screws did not render the equipment in breach of regulation 5(1) PUWER 1998 because the platform was situated over the metal frame.
  • The Claimant's injury to the front of his right leg was unlikely to have come from slipping on the platform as there was no part of the highchair there to injure the front of his leg on.
  • The accident report form signed by the Claimant stated that the rungs were slippery and caused the Claimant's accident. As this was the most contemporaneous document it was more reliable than the Claimant's account that, over time, may have become confused.

Comment - the judgment centred around the factual evidence given by the Defendant's five witnesses. It was particularly important that the witnesses made concessions when they could, such as the relatively inexpensive remedy for buying and replacing the two screws, and this won favour with the judge in believing their evidence over the more implausible Claimant's evidence.

Employers' liability – traffic route – adequate lighting - tripping hazard

White v Coventry City Council (2012) - Walsall County Court

Facts - the Claimant left work through a fire escape door and as he walked to his car, tripped and fell over a chain which was secured at either end to the wall of an alleyway, hanging between shin and knee height, separating the staff car park from the delivery area.

Findings - Regulation 5 of The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 did not apply. The Claimant's complaint was as to the presence of the chain, not any failure to maintain it. When considering regulation 8 of the Workplace Regulations the judge found that the lighting was adequate, suitable and sufficient.

It was found that this was not a reasonably used route as the Claimant accessed the route by leaving the building via a fire door, an exit which was prohibited. Whilst counsel for the Claimant had argued that he could well have come across the chain by entering the delivery area via the gate which led to the main footpath/road (without leaving the building via the fire door), the delivery area contained a gate, which was sometimes locked and therefore it was not reasonable to use the delivery area as a short cut in order to save a few seconds in walking around the footpath to the car park which was a well lit area along a main road. The chain therefore did not cross a traffic route.

The trial judge found that the chain was not a tripping hazard because it would dangle loosely at about knee height; whilst it may occasionally drop a little lower than this, it was not correct to say that the chain would be at shin height and it was not a tripwire.

The judge found that the mechanism of the Claimant's accident was not that he tripped and fell suddenly and without warning on the chain but that he attempted to step over the chain and caught his foot on the chain, causing him to fall. The accident was caused solely by the Claimant's own misjudgement.

Comment - there have been few, if any, reported cases where the courts have found an area not to be a traffic route.

Despite evidence from co-workers confirming that they regularly used the route, this was not a reasonably used route. Whilst the Defendant had not specifically prohibited the crossing of the chain, the mere presence of the chain itself together with appropriate lighting was sufficient to constitute a message of dissent.

Employers' liability – workplace – highways – negligence – Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 – s.41 Highways Act 1980

Cox v Hartlepool Borough Council (2012) - Middlesbrough County Court

Facts - the Claimant was employed by the Defendant Council as a care assistant and attended the homes of elderly service users to provide assistance with day to day living routines. On 9th April 2008 she crossed a section of public highway which she alleged was poorly lit, in order to attend the home of a service user.

The core of the Claimant's case was the fact that a premises risk assessment was carried out upon the service user's home after the accident which identified the need for an additional light to be installed outside the house. The Claimant argued that had such risk assessment been carried out before the first visit then her accident would not have occurred. The Defendant argued that the need for additional lighting arose only because of the Claimant's accident; the risk assessment had been carried out in daylight and would not otherwise have featured in the risk assessment; the service user had been visited in the preceding 11 days and no safety issues had been raised and finally that the Claimant was in any event provided with a torch for her own personal use which she conceded she did not use on the basis that it was defective. The Defendant's case was that the Workplace Regulations were not engaged as public highways were expressly excluded from the definition of "workplace" and s.41 Highways Act was not engaged as there was no defect in the highway.

Findings - the court was satisfied that the level of lighting was not so poor that no reasonable employer would have allowed its employee to go to the location. Further the Claimant was provided with a torch which she did not use and did not report to the Defendant as being defective as she knew she should.

Comment - this was a good, common sense judgment in circumstances where the lack of a pre-accident risk assessment could have been used by the judge to make a finding in favour of the Claimant. The failure by the Claimant to use, or report as defective, the torch provided to her was critical.

Employers' liability – agency care worker – trip - crèche

Mahmood v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham (2012) - Romford County Court

Facts - the claim concerned an agency care worker who alleged that she tripped on a wooden "wave" panel which formed part of a barrier to a designated baby area within a children's crèche. The panel was part of an integrated furniture system that was purchased from a specialist supplier. She alleged that she tripped on the panel as she stepped over it whilst collecting books from the baby area and sustained injury to her knee. She pleaded breach of various provisions under the Workplace (Health Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992 regarding suitability of the workplace and obstruction of traffic routes and various provisions under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 in failing to risk assess and train, as well as common law negligence.

The panel had a curved top edge which measured 61cm at its highest point and 41 cm at its lowest point. It was argued on behalf of the Defendant that the panel did not constitute an unusual danger or hazard. It could be stepped over by taking the most basic of care and it would be unreasonable for an employer to carry out a risk assessment or to train staff for such a simple and straight-forward task. There were other issues regarding whether the accident occurred as alleged. The children using the crèche and permanent staff had gone home but the Claimant had remained behind by herself when the accident allegedly occurred. Consequently the accident was not witnessed by anyone.

Findings - after hearing evidence from both sides the judge agreed that the panel did not constitute an actionable hazard and the Claimant had not taken sufficient care. The claim was dismissed and an order for costs made against the Claimant.

Comment - whilst this is a case which is fact specific it is nevertheless a common sense judgment by the Court which accepted that stepping over a relatively low panel did not require specific training or risk assessment as it did not pose a substantial risk or danger.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.