UK: Market Abuse Update

Last Updated: 23 January 2003
Article by Barry Donnelly

Co-Authored by Tim Flood and Bruce Lincoln

Enforcement levels post- N2

More than a year after N2, the anticipated headline market abuse cases have not materialised. It is the Market Integrity Group (MIG) of the FSA’s Enforcement Division which is responsible for handling market abuse cases. Apparently, between 15-20 investigations were opened last year and 20-30 are active (including pre-N2 cases). However, between 5-10 have progressed to the Regulatory Decisions Committee and 60-70% of MIG’s workload is said to be insider dealing related.

To date, only one case in the Enforcement Division (which in total comprises approximately 180 people), has been through the mediation process, producing a settlement. The mediation facility has been under a one year trial period and the FSA has decided to extend the period for 6 months. It is considered appropriate for there to be an informal process under which a resolution might be achieved, avoiding the need for a hearing before the Financial Services and Markets Tribunal. Although a mediation under the FSA disciplinary procedures differs considerably from a commercial mediation given the FSA’s limited room for negotiation, it can still clarify issues and identify common ground.

MIG comprises approximately 35 people, responsible for policing insider dealing, the civil market abuse régime and disciplinary sanctions for matters such as breaches of the Listing Rules. Insider dealing is a significant issue and in any investigation the FSA will look both at trading practices of those who deal on the basis of price sensitive information and the behaviour of the source(s) of the information.

Whilst the FSA should not get too excited about technical breaches, it is difficult to set a minimum threshold of offence without accommodating experienced market abusers. Therefore, action has to be taken in certain small cases but with the focus largely being on bigger cases and more systemic issues.

There is a range of guidance available to market participants: the Code of Market Conduct, FSA consultation (e.g. its recent paper on pre-hedging convertible and exchangeable bond issues - see below); the Market Watch newsletter; and the Market Abuse Helpline for individual guidance.

The FSA’s Market & Exchanges Division supervises the market abuse régime. Over the past fifteen months or so, it has produced the Market Watch newsletter. Although it is not strictly FSA guidance, the FSA might have some difficulty in pursuing enforcement action in circumstances falling squarely within statements in the newsletter and seems unlikely in practice to do so. The Market Abuse Helpline has been receiving calls and emails from both authorised and unauthorised persons, enquiring about a range of issues from the scope of the régime to the responsibilities of those who disseminate information. Complex questions are unlikely to be answered immediately on the telephone, and the oral guidance is not binding on the FSA.

In addition, where the FSA identifies a risk in a particular sector which warrants attention, it is likely to begin its approach through proactive supervision, site visits and guidance on the standards it expects of firms, with enforcement action reserved for the most serious cases, where firms or individuals fail to comply despitereceiving guidance.

Co-operation is to be encouraged and credit should be given when it is provided. The FSA will consider whether and if so how promptly the breach was identified by the party concerned and how much assistance was provided in the subsequent investigation. Remedial steps taken by the party concerned and the chances of reoccurrence, will also be taken into account.

After a year of constant dialogue about the new market abuse régime and the potential impact of the EU Market Abuse Directive (see below), the year 2003 is likely to herald notable enforcement activity under the market abuse régime and steps towards implementation of the new Directive.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

In ever changing markets, it is impossible for the FSA to introduce exhaustive rules or guidance, and the list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) annexed to the Market Conduct Sourcebook last July, will inevitably grow. Following consultation commenced immediately post-N2, the FSA annexed two sets of FAQs, providing guidance on the scope and operation of the market abuse régime, the Code of Market Conduct and the price stabilising rules.

Responses to FAQs on the Code of Market Conduct included:

• behaviour in relation to share options will fall within the scope of the market abuse régime if the subject of the options is shares traded on a prescribed market. Behaviour in relation to contracts for differences will also fall within the scope of the régime where the behaviour relates to a qualifying investment;

• the regular market user test operates as an objective standard and in case there was any doubt about it, the regular user is not a real person. Although the FSA has emphasised that it is not itself the regular user, it would initially be required to form a view about whether particular behaviour is acceptable. In these circumstances it may contact market participants to determine what they themselves would consider to be the regular user’s standard;

• as for accepted market practices which might be considered unacceptable, the FSA reiterated that it does not expect there to be frequent divergences between the standards which are generally accepted by users of the market and standards expected by the hypothetical regular user. However, if the FSA does identify a practice which is accepted in the market, but which it believes may be likely to fall short of the standards expected by the regular user, the FSA will consider whether to make its view on the practice known in the form of guidance, a statement, revisions to the Code of Market Conduct, or enforcement action;

• the FSA will not consider an intermediary who executes an abusive transaction to be engaging in, or requiring or encouraging market abuse unless the intermediary knew or ought reasonably to have known that the originator of the transaction was engaging in market abuse. The FSA will focus on the person who originates the transaction, rather than the intermediary. The régime is not intended to impose extra obligations on intermediaries, but the regular user’s assessment of an intermediary’s behaviour is likely to take account of the intermediary’s compliance with applicable rules. Therefore, the regular user will recognise the differences in the standards of behaviour expected from different kinds of intermediaries;

• The FSA expects the supervisor of a prescribed market to investigate suspected cases of market abuse and to take enforcement action where the misconduct is limited to that prescribed market, the supervisor has jurisdiction over all of the parties concerned and the supervisor’s enforcement powers are sufficient to deal with the misconduct in question. Otherwise, the FSA will conduct an investigation and refer firms to the operational guidelines agreed between various market supervisors and operators in November 2001.

The FAQs also dealt with issues relating to the investigation of suspected cases of market abuse during a take-over bid and the status of guidance on the Code of Market Conduct.

As a further result of the consultation process last year, the FSA decided to include an additional annex of specialist topics, commenting on the scope of the market abuse régime for bonds and grey market trading, including:

• where a qualifying investment trades on a prescribed market, it falls within the scope of the régime. Bonds traded on or traded subject to the rules of the London Stock Exchange are qualifying investments traded on a prescribed market;

• Eurobonds which have at no time traded on a recognised investment exchange, fall outside the régime. However, bonds admitted to trading on a prescribed market but actually traded subject to the rules of a non-prescribed market may still fall within the scope of the régime if they have previously traded on the prescribed market;

• for the unofficial or "grey" market in the buying and selling of new issues of shares before they formally become available for trading on the London StockExchange or other prescribed market, such trading will fall within the scope of the régime where it is subject to rules of a prescribed market which deal with such trading in a security or derivative of that security. This is because the definition of "traded on a market" includes trading which is subject to the rules of a prescribed market;

• behaviour which occurs in relation to a qualifying investment traded on a prescribed market and which therefore falls within the scope of the market abuse régime, will include further offerings of shares by an issuer who has already issued shares which "traded on" a prescribed market. In addition, where the effect of any behaviour persists until the security is actually traded on an exchange, that behaviour will relate to the security. For example, new issues by a previously unlisted issuer will not be "traded on" a prescribed market ahead of the issue, but will be capable of falling within the scope of the régime if information disclosed about them for trading on a prescribed market, is false or misleading.

EU Market Abuse Directive

The EU Market Abuse Directive (Insider Dealing and Market Manipulation), proposed by the Commission in May 2001, was adopted in early December 2002.

The existing European legal framework for protecting the integrity of markets is considered incomplete. The Insider Dealing Directive confines itself to preventing the misuse of privileged information. There are no common provisions against market manipulation across Europe. Within member states, rules vary greatly and legal requirements differ per jurisdiction, which may lead to competitive distortions in the financial markets. In addition, the emergence of new products and technologies, increasing cross-border trade and the development of inter-connected markets, may increase the opportunities for market manipulation, such as the dissemination of false or misleading information via the Internet.

Since the stated objective of the present Insider Dealing Directive and the Market Abuse Directive is to ensure the integrity of European financial markets and to enhance investor confidence in those markets, the Insider Dealing Directive will be repealed, leaving a common legal framework covering both insider dealing and market manipulation under the Market Abuse Directive.

The proposed Directive would apply to all transactions concerning financial instruments admitted to trading on at least one regulated market in the EU, including primary markets, whether the transaction is undertaken on a regulated market or not. It would therefore also take in markets such as Alternative Trading Systems (ATS), since these could be used for insider dealing or market manipulation in connection with financial instruments negotiated on regulated markets.

The Directive proposes that each member state should designate a single regulatory authority with a common minimum set of responsibilities. These authorities would use convergent methods to combat market abuse and would assist each other in taking action against infringement, particularly in cross-border cases. The Directive also proposes that wrongful conduct should incur the same penalty in each of the member states, which is not the case at the moment. However, it is not proposed that there be complete harmonisation of penalties. The new disciplinary framework will contribute towards some degree of convergence between national systems (which vary considerably) so as to ensure compliance with the Directive.

There has been much criticism of the Market Abuse Directive, including the fact that it purports to support a minimum standard across member states rather than a common standard and that it may interfere with effective take-over regulation. In addition, it may not effectively harmonise criminal or administrative provisions. Changes were made to the original proposals including the adoption of safe harbours for "legitimate purpose" and Chinese Walls.

Under the Lamfalussy structure which was established to expedite the introduction, implementation and enforcement of EU securities legislation, there is a four level legislative process. Under level 2, implementing measures are developed by the Commission on the advice of the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR). The Commission expects shortly to receive the advice of CESR following its market consultation last Summer on the level 2 implementing measures required under the proposed Directive. From the UK perspective, a matter of interest is whether the regular user, which is absent from the proposed Directive, will be restored through the level 2 implementing measures.

It is expected that the Directive, about which the FSA has expressed nervousness in the past, will take no more than eighteen months to be implemented in member states, following its adoption in early December last year.

Short Selling

Responses to the FSA’s consultation in relation to the somewhat controversial practice of short selling, are required by the end of January 2003.

Last September, Sir Howard Davies stated that the City should think "long and hard" before seeking controls on short selling which he described as "normal activity" benefiting speedy price adjustments. However, he said, that the FSA recognised the need for greater transparency and noted interesting issues relating to how shares lent for short selling were voted. A round table hosted by the FSA had considered various disclosure options including publication of Crestco stock borrowing figures.

Nevertheless, the new market abuse régime has brought short selling into the spotlight and prompted the FSA to publish its discussion paper in October 2002, on options for greater disclosure and enhancement to settlement arrangements.

Although the FSA recognises short selling as a legitimate activity, it accepts that there are potential risks (such as the increase in short term price volatility and the use of manipulative trading tactics), but considers these to be addressed by the current market and the new regulatory arrangements.

Four main options were set-out in the paper:

• notification and publication of short sales in the cash equity market (such as in the US), to include aggregate naked (those not covered by borrowing stock) and covered short sales;

• full reporting and publication of short positions in both the cash equity and derivatives’ markets to provide a more complete measure;

• disclosure of naked short sales;

• the release of securities lending data as a rough guide to the level of short selling.

Aggregate figures would be susceptible to double-counting and Crestco has been examining whether it might be able to extract more selective and accurate information, which would also have the advantage of avoiding extra reporting requirements. On the question of short sales settlement, the FSA is concerned about the response to trade failure and questions whether the Exchanges should be given less time to buy in securities when problems arise. An alternative might be to incorporate guaranteed delivery into all short sales’ stock.

Wash Trades

In the latest issue of Market Watch (October 2002), the FSA has expressed concern over the practice of wash trading between market counterparties (trading the same instrument back and forth at the same price), especially in the commodity and fixed income markets. The FSA has reiterated that wash trading is artificial and likely to create a false and misleading impression which prevents market users from being able to rely upon the volumes and/or prices of trading as a basis for investment decisions.

Pre-hedging convertible and exchangeable bond issues

A policy statement and guidance is expected shortly from the FSA, following last Summer’s consultation in relation to the market abuse implications of pre-hedging convertible and exchangeable bond issues. Responses were required by 31 October 2002.

Some market participants pre-hedge issues of convertible (i.e into the issuing company’s own shares) or exchangeable (convertible into a third party’s shares) bonds in order to deal with their potential exposure if the issue is not fully sold.

The purpose of consultation has been to clarify which pre-hedging practices are acceptable under the Code of Market Conduct and to identify which might amount to market abuse. There have been divergent opinions about the extent to which hedging should be permitted before the launch of a convertible or exchangeable bond issue is disclosed. The FSA identified a number of hedging strategies which may be used by underwriters:

• selling underlying shares short or entering into derivative transactions to sell the shares;

• borrowing underlying shares to cover short sales or in anticipation of entering into short sales;

• "icing" (see below) underlying shares in order to borrow the shares to cover short sales;

• hedging the credit risk associated with the issue or purchasing credit protection through a credit derivative.

The FSA stated that the regular user is likely to consider that no dealing or arranging in the underlying shares would be acceptable before disclosure of the bond launch is made. Dealing and arranging is defined as:

• selling the underlying shares short;

• entering into a derivative transaction to sell the shares• borrowing the underlying shares;

• entering into certain types of derivative transactions in relation to either type of bond in circumstances where the default provisions reference a qualifying investment.

"Icing" (the practise of arranging with a lender for stock which is to be borrowed in the future to be reserved in advance), can be done informally through a non-binding arrangement which is likely to be considered acceptable by the regular user if commercially reasonable to facilitate the potential stock loan as a hedge and does not involve contractual agreements. The same could not be said for a contractual "pay to hold" agreement which would result in shares being unavailable to other market participants whereas the person undertaking informal icing does not gain any advantage over other market participants.

In addition, the FSA indicated that entering into credit protection in respect of the bond issue prior to its launch may be regarded by the regular user as acceptable, in certain circumstances, if the credit default terms are not linked to a qualifying investment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.