UK: Delivering Environmental Quality and Value to Stakeholders

Last Updated: 16 January 2003
Article by John Henry Looney


Sustainable development is attracting significant attention. However, the two key business issues that underlie the decision process have yet to be fully worked out in terms of current best practice. Those issues are the measuring and delivering of quality and value arising at the interface between industrial pragmatism and the more public 'popular science' approach to the environment.

Delivering quality in environmental consultancy should be obvious and straightforward. However, as demonstrated by industrial project reviews and the public acceptability of results, this is clearly not always the case. Industry often leads the way for value in environmental protection, linking this closely to financial targets and public image. However, this concept does not always accord with the use of the term value.

The paper develops ideas on how quality and value should be measured and managed, with examples from a range of technical areas. Without clear ways to demonstrate quality and value to all stakeholders the pursuit of sustainability will remain elusive.

Paper Logic:




Measuring} {Quality

Delivering} {Value

At stake:

Sustainable Development Delivery

Stakeholder Acceptance

Sub issues:

Industrial Pragmatism

Popular Science



Assessment / Review of Industrial Project Examples



"The ability to reason is the fundamental characteristic of human beings."

is the opening sentence of William Hughes book on Critical Thinking. He develops his subject carefully and well. The perspective I wish to develop from this approach is the apparent difficulty of agreeing results in delivering quality and value in environmental areas, particularly as it relates to the current area of sustainable development. To make progress here we need to understand and agree better how we can use the three skills in critical thinking:

  • Interpretative Skills – determining precise meaning
  • Verification Skills – determining if the statements are true or false, and
  • Reasoning Skills – assessing the arguments’ validity.

Since different people or groups can look at the same data, for example on waste, or ecological value, and draw diametrically opposite conclusions it seems some problems exist in the methods for developing and agreeing ideas. This paper looks at how a better understanding of quality and value determinations could help people reach fair and logical agreements. This is important for several practical reasons (adapted from Hughes):

  • We live in the information age, not a knowledge or wisdom age, we are inundated and do not have the ability to filter or interpret the data overload,
  • We are constantly presented with arguments designed to get us to accept some conclusion that we would otherwise not accept,
  • We have to develop our own intellectual self-respect to sort arguments out, and
  • Controversially, critical thinking makes it easier for us to persuade others to change their beliefs.

Before we get into a detailed analysis of quality and value, let’s set the scene on Sustainable Development. The Bruntland Report (1987) definition is well known and defines the concept as:

There are two key issues as part of this:

  • Development is not just about bigger profits and higher standards of living for a minority. It should be about making life better for everyone, and
  • This should not involve destroying or recklessly using up our natural resources, nor should it involve polluting the environment.

A question though, and one which remains elusive is just what is Sustainable Development in practice? Instead of reinventing a wheel on this, a recent reference can help stimulate our thinking. Roy Siegfried (2002) (See also believes that the mantra or diktat of Sustainability needs to be analytically assessed. He controversially states that: 'The truth is that a concern for the welfare of future generations is hardly paramount amongst billions of people. Marx (Groucho not Karl) put it this way:

"Why should we bother about the next generation? They have never done anything for us."’

Professor Siegfried clearly sees both the need for and impracticality of Sustainable Development noting on his book jacket that the real challenge is that:

The rich will not stop their degradation of the environment and the poor cannot.

So, as an example, lets examine the wonderful decision process related to the Brent Spar disposal in the 1990s and how this can show the interface between the industrial pragmatism and ‘popular science’ approaches to the environment. The Brent Spar was a loading buoy and storage vessel used for 15 years when it was decommissioned in 1991. At the time Shell wanted to clean it and dispose of it at sea, with the agreement of the UK Government at the time. The Spar consisted of oil storage tanks and footings as well as other items such as staff quarters, amounting to tonnes of iron, steel and other materials. The 1,600 tonne oil tanks and the main body of the platform have since been reused at a cost of about £43M versus the £4.5M disposal cost option. The cost of recovery of the material in terms of environmental emissions is not known for the energy of recovery and cutting up and reusing of the materials, noting the footings of perhaps 10,000 tonnes were still left in place. Was the environmental benefit of reuse greater than disposal and replacement in this case?

Where among this does sustainability lie? Where and when in the process of decision making about the disposal of the Spar did a group of people have sufficient information to interpret, verify and determine a reasoned course of action. Shell, supported by detailed environmental studies and those of a National Government, had determined that the disposal option presented the Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO, a forerunner of BAT). Apparently in private meetings even Greenpeace agreed this, but the issue became part of the public arena and very emotive. The disposal of a tiny part of the infrastructure of the oil industry was looked at under a microscope without recourse it seems to the larger Sustainable Development Issues of whether the capacity for oil delivery (much less fuel conservation) was needed or should be addressed. There were clearly presented arguments, for and against, that were designed by Critical Thinkers, "to get people to accept some conclusion that we would otherwise not accept". So who won and were future generations served? The rational arguments presented to reflect "industrial pragmatism" were balanced economic and environmental assessments, but who was the jury on these from a qualified perspective, as the "Popular Science" perspective prevailed? A conclusion is that in 1998 the European nations agreed to ban the dumping of offshore steel oil rigs at a conference on sea pollution attended by environment ministers from 15 countries, but noting they agreed to leave the footings (the main mass of materials) in place. It should be correct to assume, but critical analysis does not yet have the evidence, that the long-term Sustainable Development gains of this minor material reuse will be beneficial to us, and that the design of future oilrigs is now focused on long-term quality and reuse potential to reduce their net environmental costs. Or is all of this a smokescreen to allow us to feel better about maintaining our standard of living?

Tying back to the theme, where did the quality of the work by the Consultants get measured and how did it affect the decision process? Where was the assessment of value, and to whom, and by whom determined? The disposal case was apparently clearly defined and logical, but other arguments prevailed, so there should be value measurable, in economic, environmental and social metrics to demonstrate this. One argument of course is that each minor incremental gain will build to a substantial change, which is true if we are targeting the key issues. Reusable or renewal oil platforms still support the apparent relentless growth of fuel use.

Another more personal example was the Environment Agency project on flood protection in the Norfolk Broads. The Agency wanted to find a method for predicting the best environmental areas so that they could focus their investment to provide not just flood protection and ecological quality maintenance but improvement. So to support Sustainable Development in Broadlands the Agency Team was working on a combination of retreat and protection, but focused also on ecological improvement. A committee had developed a raft of excellent ideas that as a collective indicator was not working. Part of the dilemma was whether a rare and protected bird was worth more than a rare and protected plant. The indicator developed by a consultant used thresholds so that an area could qualify based on passing any of several metrics. In this case is it clear, within the bounds of the project, to see that the Consultant’s contribution to the method development has helped deliver improved environmental quality, economic areas better protected from flooding and a happy Agency manager. In this case we can see therefore fairly obvious quality of technical work and concept adding value, which the team would agree and support. (Of course this argument may be leading you to a conclusion.)

Let’s assume a rational body somewhere that could have oversight of these issues and public accountability and make Sustainable Development decisions. This would include public participation as well as detailed economic analysis and also a long-term view on environmental and social quality and metrics. We would also need to help people be less self-centred but this is beyond this brief paper, and Siegfried’s conclusion on rich and poor will prevail for the present it seems. Despite these shortcomings we can make progress on identifying quality and value measures, to make sure that as consultants we provide quality technical services and add value to the projects and clients we are privileged to support. As part of developing progress on sustainability we want to solve problems and not treat symptoms.

David Maister ( provides excellent guidance on these issues to professional services firms, including the ability to access free materials on quality and value over the Internet. His focus on quality includes both consultative quality (the interaction with clients and stakeholders) and technical quality (of the work, whether scientific, engineering, economic or a combination). Much of his perspective here is on human resources type management, for example training, accountable and open working relationships, focus on quality before profit and similar. His approach to measuring and managing value actions is equally clear, with a focus on contributing value to your client to make their performance and work better quality.

One way I have often defined this is to consider how my work should be focused on providing support to my client to allow them to justify their decisions to their colleagues or the public. If there is clear accountability for the decision process and the assumptions taken for a particular study or project, then over time public scrutiny will progress the process towards more sustainable decisions.

Therefore, perhaps the Brent Spar decision has lead to a better understanding of material reuse and will be worth the extra £40M over time, as equally the Broadlands project supported improvement in environmental quality. As consultants we need to continually improve our quality of work, our understanding of our client’s issues and how these relate to global issues and opportunities. Perhaps over time those in the ‘western’ economies will see how their daily decisions affect their environment and those in the ‘developing’ economies will have the opportunity to take longer term decisions. At present both are challenged, though of course you may have been lead to this conclusion.

In closing, remember to watch out for how many are trying to convince you of something you would not otherwise accept.


Bruntland Report, The World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future; OUP.

William Hughes (1996). Critical Thinking, An Introduction to the Basic Skills, 2ed, Broadview Press.

Roy Siegfried (2002). Keeping the Rainbow. Africa Geographic.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions