UK: Rabone No 2

Last Updated: 1 August 2012
Article by Sian Fisher

This case was reviewed in previous editions of Health Law News. We reported that the Court of Appeal's conclusion that NHS Trusts did not owe a positive obligation to safeguard the lives of voluntary patients, must provide some comfort to increasingly beleaguered NHS Trusts. Unfortunately, that comfort proved somewhat illusory as the Supreme Court has now reversed that decision. In this article, we examine the implications for all NHS Trusts of this important judgment.

The facts

The background of the case will be familiar, but by way of reminder, the deceased, Melanie Rabone, was admitted to Stepping Hill Hospital on a voluntary basis following a severe episode of a recurrent depressive disorder. Despite objections raised by her parents, the claimants to the action, the deceased was allowed home leave, during which time she committed suicide.

Procedural position

A claim for negligence was compromised in the sum of £7,500, but the claimants also brought a claim for damages pursuant to the Human Rights Act 1998, alleging breach of Article 2, the right to life. Furthermore, they argued that they were victims of the breach, and were therefore entitled to compensation. The claim failed both at first instance and on appeal; although it was found on the facts of the case that had an operational obligation been owed it would have been breached. The claimants appealed to the Supreme Court, and here, they were successful.

Supreme Court ruling

In the leading judgment, Lord Dyson held the Trust was under a positive duty to safeguard the life of the deceased. Although a voluntary patient, the deceased was vulnerable and posed a real suicide risk; she was under the control of the Trust which had assumed responsibility for her.

Having thus established an operational obligation was owed, it came as little surprise that the Supreme Court found it had been breached. This was, after all, the conclusion previously reached by the Court of Appeal. Previous cases had established that the risk of death had to be 'real and immediate'. The evidence of the psychiatrist who gave evidence for the Trust, and whose evidence was preferred at first instance, described a risk of suicide as between 5-10%. This was accepted both in the Court of Appeal and by Lord Dyson as reflecting a 'real' risk of suicide, thus satisfying the first qualifying limb. The Trust's argument that the risk had to be 'imminent' was rejected, with Lord Dyson preferring to interpret 'immediate' to mean 'present and continuing'. Having reached the conclusion that the risk of the deceased attempting suicide was real and immediate, the decision to allow her home was described as one which 'no reasonable psychiatric practitioner would have made'. Breach was established.

The question of whether the claimants enjoyed victim status within Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights was dealt with in short order. Lord Dyson was able to point to a clear line of European Court of Human Rights decisions which provided that relatives of the deceased were able to claim in their own right.

Finally, the Supreme Court was required to consider whether the claimants would forfeit that status if they had already been awarded compensation in a negligence claim. The parties accepted that victim status would have been forfeited if the State has provided 'adequate redress', and 'acknowledged either expressly or in substance the breach of the Convention'. The Trust argued that both conditions had been met, and therefore the claimants were not entitled to further compensation.

That argument was rejected by the Supreme Court. The damages paid to the claimants in the civil claim were in respect of losses to the Estate under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934. The claimants had received no compensation for their loss as the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 did not permit parents of an adult child to make such a claim. Thus, they had not received 'adequate redress'. However, the Supreme Court did go on to find that although the claimants retained their status as victims as a result, the fact the Trust admitted breach of duty was evidence of an admission of breach of Article 2.

Keep calm and carry on!

Whilst there is no doubt this is an unwelcome judgment, the important point to remember is that it does not impose additional burdens on treating clinicians; who remain under a duty to provide reasonable care to their patients. What it does mean is, if that duty is breached, then the consequences of that breach so far as a Trust is concerned are potentially greater, depending on the facts of the case. If the case involves a psychiatric patient, whether detained or not, then breach of duty of care will also invoke the operational obligations of Article 2, which could mean payment of compensation in addition to an award of damages in a civil claim.

Whether the operational duty will be imposed only in cases of psychiatric patients is unclear. Lady Hale did emphasise that, in deciding the case in favour of the claimants, the Supreme Court was not attempting to make "an exception to the general rule that the State is not responsible for the deaths of hospital patients". However, given the parents of adult children have no means of seeking redress for their loss, claimant lawyers will doubtless redouble their efforts to persuade her otherwise.

A more immediate practical effect may be seen in the realm of inquests. While it has been reasonably settled ground that investigations into the death of a compulsorily detained mental health patient would be subject to the wider Article 2 investigations, the position regarding informal patients has often been the subject of some discussion. Similarly, there was uncertainty regarding the status of investigations where a mental health patient dies in an acute setting (e.g. suicide after admission to CDU). The thrust of the Supreme Court's decision now suggests that in the presence of a real and immediate risk of suicide and where the patient has been admitted under the care of an NHS Trust, the wider investigation responsibilities may well be triggered. In truth, however, it is our experience that even prior to the Supreme Court's decision coroners were inclined to act as if Article 2 was engaged – to that extent, therefore, there may be no practical difference in coronial practice.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions