Christou and another v London Borough of Haringey UKEAT/0298/11 and 0299/11
The EAT held in this case that an employer will not necessarily be precluded from conducting second formal disciplinary proceedings against an employee in respect of a matter for which that employee has already been disciplined.
Facts
The two claimants in this case were the team manager and social
worker responsible for the care of Baby P. Following Baby
P's death, Haringey's Local Safeguarding Children Board
investigated the claimants' conduct under the council's
"Simplified Disciplinary Procedure", which did not grant
power to dismiss employees. The outcome was that the
claimants were issued with written warnings for misconduct, the
maximum penalty under the simplified procedure.
An investigation into Haringey's child welfare services was
later undertaken. One of the conclusions reached was that the first
disciplinary proceedings had been inadequate, as they failed to
consider the more serious issues. A second set of disciplinary
proceedings was held under the council's full procedure, and
resulted in the claimants' summary dismissal for gross
misconduct.
The claimants challenged the fairness of their dismissals.
The Employment Tribunal held that the dismissals were fair and the
claimants appealed to the EAT.
Decision
The EAT upheld the Employment Tribunal's decision, holding that it had been correct to find that Haringey should not be restricted from instigating further disciplinary proceedings in a situation where the new senior management had taken a different view as to the seriousness of the conduct which had been the subject of the initial proceedings. The previous sanctions imposed on the employees were not sufficiently severe in the context of the extent of the employees' failings.
Comment
While this decision confirms that the dismissal of an employee for an offence for which they have already been disciplined can be fair, employers should view the decision with extreme caution. The EAT was quick to warn that the circumstances in which it will be fair to instigate further disciplinary proceedings will be extremely rare. It will only be in exceptional circumstances that an employer can justify such actions, ordinarily by reference to the fact that significant further evidence came to light which meant its actions were reasonable.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.