UK: How To Deal With A Tenant In Administration

Legal update for landlords
Last Updated: 24 July 2012
Article by David Marsden

This year there has been a spate of high profile retailers entering administration. In the first part of 2012 Blacks, Peacocks, Clintons, La Senza, Game and Past Times have all gone into administration. This is often seen as an indication of the state of the retail market, in particular the high street. Whilst this is no doubt true, administrations are often also used as a restructuring exercise.

The position of landlords faced with a tenant in administration has been complicated by recent caselaw. Some light has been shed on this by the very recent case of Lazari GP Limited & Lazari Real Estates Limited v Game Retail (UK) Limited, handed down on 11 May 2012, in which Charles Russell acted for the successful landlord.


A tenant usually starts the administration process by filing at court a Notice of Intention to appoint an administrator. As soon as this is done, the tenant is protected by a moratorium which prevents any action being taken by creditors.

In the context of a lease para 43 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act prevents the landlord from distraining on rent or forfeiting against a tenant in administration. Forfeiture (i.e. terminating the lease by proceedings or peaceable re-entry) is therefore only available against a tenant in administration where the landlord either obtains consent from the administrator or permission from the court.

As soon as forfeiture becomes an issue, the landlord must also be very careful not to waive the right to forfeit by, for example, demanding or accepting rent.


Guidance on how the court should deal with applications for permission to forfeit was given in re Atlantic Computer Systems Plc [1992] Ch 505 (CA). It is essentially a two fold test:

  • Purpose of Administration: permission should normally be given if forfeiture is unlikely to impede the achievement of the purpose of the administration.

The purpose of an administration is either to:

(a) rescue the company as a going concern;

(b) achieve a better result for the company's creditors as a whole than would be likely if the company were wound up (without first being in administration); or

(c) realise property in order to make a distribution to one or more secured or preferential creditors.

If there is no prejudice to the administration then the balancing exercise below does not apply. If however there can be shown to be some prejudice then the balancing exercise will be carried out.

  • Balancing Exercise: if there may be some prejudice to the administration by forfeiture then the court must balance the interests of the landlord and the interests of the other creditors of the company.

In conducting the balancing exercise, great importance is normally to be given to the proprietary interests of the landlord. It will normally be a sufficient ground for the grant of permission if significant loss would be caused to the landlord by a refusal.

Administrator's Strategy

When a tenant goes into administration the administrator will usually separate out the profitable stores in the portfolio from the non-profitable stores. A landlord should therefore immediately ask the administrator whether he is prepared to pay rent as an expense of the administration. In response:

  • Non-Profitable Stores: the administrator will write to the landlords of the nonprofitable stores and offer a surrender. In that situation a landlord will often agree in principle to a surrender until such time as they have found a new tenant and will then formalise the surrender. This at least saves on any rates liability.
  • Profitable Stores: the administrator will wish to continue to use these properties. It used to be that the administrator would offer to pay rent as an expense of the administration during their period of occupation only. This has been somewhat complicated by two recent cases of Goldacre and Luminar (below).

In practice, the administrator will often sell the assets of the company in administration to a newly incorporated company specifically incorporated for that purpose. The administrator will then grant a licence to occupy to that newly incorporated company and will seek consent from the landlord to assign to that new company.

At this stage landlords should be asking for a copy of the sales contract and ask the administrator for clarification of the purposes of the administration.

Consent to Assign

The terms on which a landlord can or cannot refuse consent to assign are set out in the lease for each property. Often, a landlord can reasonably withhold consent to an assignment to a newly incorporated company on the grounds of financial standing. A response by a landlord to any request to assign needs to be swift but also carefully considered as a landlord cannot add subsequent reasons later for their refusal to consent to assign. If the landlord gets it wrong the administrator can claim that the landlord is unreasonably withholding consent and insist on the assignment.

Payment of Rent

Goldacre (Offices) Limited v Nortel Networks UK Limited (in administration) [2010] Ch.45 was considered a "landlord friendly" case. It states that if an administrator is in the property on the quarter date he is liable for all rent on the quarter date for that entire quarter as an expense of administration. This is because almost all leases will state that rent is quarterly and payable in advance.

Administrators started to use Goldacre to say that if they were not in on the quarter date they were not liable to pay the rent. In Leisure (Norwich) II Limited v. Luminar Lava Ignite Limited [2012] EWHC 951 (Ch.) it was held that:-

  • where rents fell due prior to the start of the administration, those arrears are not payable as an expense of the administration but;
  • where rents fall during the administration and the administrator is using the property, the whole quarter's rent is due as an expense of the administration. This is of course very much against landlords and will no doubt either be distinguished or overturned in the Court of Appeal. One issue that remained undecided, however, was whether if an administrator chose not to pay rent for the first quarter, the landlord could still forfeit. Lazari v. Game decided that it could.

Lazari GP v Game (UK) Retail

This case is a good example of the above principles in practice, in the context of a modern administration.

Game went into administration on 26 March 2012, being the day after the quarter date. Lazari were Game's landlord at their flagship property on Oxford Street. PwC, the administrators of Game, stated that as a result of Goldacre and Luminar they were not prepared to pay rent for the March quarter because they were not in occupation on the March quarter date. They therefore sought to prevent the landlord from forfeiting whilst at the same time not paying rent from March to June. PwC also granted a licence to occupy to a newly incorporated company called Baker Acquisitions Limited without landlord's consent. The administrators claimed that they had entered into a Business Sale Agreement with Baker Acquisitions Limited selling Game's assets but that they were not prepared to disclose a copy for commercial reasons.

Lazari served a s146 notice on PwC detailing three breaches of lease:

  • non payment of rent (for which such a notice is not required in any event);
  • insolvency; and
  • breach of the alienation provisions.

The administrators refused consent to forfeit and so Lazari applied to court for immediate consent to forfeit. That application was heard on 11 May 2012.

It may be asked how a company no longer in occupation might suffer prejudice in allowing a forfeiture because the party really suffering from the forfeiture is the illegal occupier. This is often addressed by administrators by an element of deferred consideration in the business sale agreement, whereby the buyer of the insolvent business agrees to pay deferred consideration in the event of a successful assignment. In Lazari v. Game, however, and following the guidance in Atlantic Computers, the court held that there was no evidence of any prejudice to the administration in allowing the forfeiture and therefore it did not even need to consider the balancing exercise.

It thereby showed that forfeiture can take place even post Luminar, where the Administrator chooses not to pay rent. This is of course correct because, whether the rent is technically payable or not, the refusal to pay rent by the administrator is a prejudice that the landlord is suffering and cannot be ignored under the Atlantic Computers test.

Landlords do however have to act early and need to adopt tactics to ensure that the matter gets to court as quickly as possible.


Certainty in the law is a rare luxury but it does seem that the recent caselaw has complicated what used to be quite a straightforward area of law. Administrators used to have to "pay as you go" and pay rent as an expense for the time of their use. Luminar has not only stopped this but has also seen moratoriums used for a purpose they were not intended, in denying forfeiture for the benefit of third parties.

As the Court of Appeal stated in Atlantic Computers:

"An administrator is an officer of the court. He can be expected to make his decision speedily, so for as he can do so. He may be able at least to make an interim decision, such as agreeing to pay the current rents for the time being. The administrator should also make his decision responsibly. His power to give or withhold consent was not intended to be used as a bargaining counter in a negotiation in which the administration has regard only to the interests of the unsecured creditors."

The sooner the courts can distinguish Luminar therefore, and get back to the common sense position that previously prevailed whereby administrators pay for their use, the better for all concerned.

If your tenant has gone into administration and you need further guidance, please do not hesitate to contact the author.

"After the decision in Luminar, this case provides some comfort for landlords. It is only fair that where a tenant deliberately waits until after a quarter day before going into administration to avoid paying the rent, the landlord may still forfeit the lease." Counsel Jonathan Upton, Tanfield Chambers

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
DMH Stallard
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
DMH Stallard
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions