UK: Insurance And Reinsurance Update - 5th June 2012

Last Updated: 21 June 2012
Article by Nigel Brook

Ted Baker Plc v Axa Insurance UK

Whether theft by employee fell within scope of an insurance policy/construction of insurance policies

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2012/1406.html

The insured discovered that one of its employees had been stealing stock from its warehouse and sought an indemnity from its insurers. The relevant insurance policy had a number of discrete sections including a Theft section which contained an endorsement providing that "the insurance by this Section extends to cover loss...resulting from theft or any attempt thereat but the Insured shall be responsible for the first Ł1,000...which does not involve entry to or exit from the Premises by forcible and violent means".

One of the sections of the insurer's standard wording - the Theft by Employees Section ("TES") - was not selected by the insured and did not form part of the policy issued to the insured. Nevertheless, Eder J held that there was cover under the Theft section of the Policy "and the wording should be given its plain meaning, namely that theft means theft, including theft by employees as this is not otherwise excluded".

The judge further held that there was no customary usage of the expression "theft or any attempt thereat" and underwriters' subjective views as to how cover should work were inadmissible. He also rejected an argument that something had gone wrong with the wording because the insured's construction was contrary to business commonsense or that market practice assisted the insurers' arguments. He held thatRainy Sky v Kookmin (see Weekly Update 39/11) did not apply to this case because there were not two competing constructions of the words used.

The judge acknowledged that inMopani Copper Mines v Millennium Underwriting (see Weekly Update 25/08) Clarke J had held that it was possible to look at deleted words in a policy in certain circumstances. However, he concluded that in this case the policy was clear and so it was not permissible to take into account the insured's non-selection of the TES as an aid to construction of the Theft section of the policy. In any event, the TES could not have been selected without amendment in this case and so, even if the non-selection was taken into account, it would not have helped insurers.

Elafonissos Fishing v Aigaion

Whether insured had proved its claim/breach of warranty allegation

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2012/1512.html

Clyde & Co for defendant

The insured sought to claim for damage which it said its fishing vessel had suffered in a port when a cyclone struck the port. Shortly before trial, the insurer confirmed that it would not be putting forward a positive case but that, instead, the insured should be put to "strict proof".

Blair J acknowledged that certain issues could not be clarified at trial by oral evidence and cross-examination because all the insured's factual evidence was tendered under the Civil Evidence Act. However, he held that limited (rather than no) weight should be given to the Civil Evidence Act statements. He concluded that the insured had succeeded in proving its case (except in relation to a salvage claim - see below).

As part of his judgment, the judge found that an amount paid for wages and maintenance of crew should be allowed even though the insured had to have crew on board anyway (because the payment was allowable pursuant to the Rules of Practice of the Association of Average Adjusters).

However, the insured had not proved its claim for salvage by another vessel. Unlike the rest of its claim, this part of the claim had not been intermediated through a third party and so there had been no element of outside scrutiny. Furthermore, there had been no explanation as to why insurers had not been asked in advance to agree a payment to the vessel owners. In any event, taking into account Greek law on the point, the amount paid had not been reasonable.

Insurers had also sought to rely on a breach of warranty. The relevant warranty was "Warranted laid up...in the Port of Mahajanga". Insurers were unable to prove a breach on the facts, but Blair J held, in any event that there was no basis for implying into the warranty further requirements on the insured to comply with the port regulations: "because of the potentially draconian effects of the breach of promissory warranties (ie that breach discharges the insurer as from the moment of breach regardless of whether the breach causes or contributes to the loss), they will be construed narrowly".

RBS v Highland Financial Partners

Whether clause was an exclusive jurisdiction clause and whether it bound assignee/anti-suit injunction

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2012/1278.html

The claimant sought an anti-suit injunction restraining the pursuit of proceedings in the US. Several issues fell to be considered by Burton J, including the following:

1) Was the relevant jurisdiction clause an exclusive jurisdiction agreement? The clause provided that "the courts of England shall have jurisdiction". Burton J held that it did, in context, amount to an exclusive jurisdiction clause especially since the next clause in the agreement was entitled "Non Exclusive Jurisdiction". The express word "exclusive" did not need to be used.

2) Was an assignee of the defendants bound by the clause? The defendants sought to rely onThrough Transport Mutual v New India [2005] but Burton J referred to caselaw and textbook commentary which have criticised the decision. The judge held that the assignee was bound by the exclusive jurisdiction clause (the point, in any event, having been eventually conceded by the assignee, it seems).

3) Could the claimant obtain an anti-suit injunction to restrain proceedings which were being brought in the US not just against itself but also against two of its employees (who had been joined to the US proceedings as personal defendants). There is conflicting caselaw on the issue of whether an anti-suit injunction can be ordered to restrain proceedings against a non-party. However, Burton J concluded that "the obvious reputational damage for [the claimant] resulting from the making of a claim as to what [the employees] have allegedly done during their employment, in itself gives [the claimant] a sufficient interest" for the court to grant an anti-suit injunction restraining the US proceedings against the employees.

Ambra Borgognoni Vimercati v BV Trustco

Expert determination and the rights of one of the parties/whether the court should intervene

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2012/1410.html

The parties entered into an agreement which provided that, should the claimant dispute the price obtained by the defendant, she would be entitled to request the defendant "to obtain at her cost ...a market valuation...by an expert to be appointed by the International Chamber of Arbitration in Milan". Following a subsequent dispute, the claimant did not accept the defendant's proposed approach to instructing the expert. She sought various orders from the court.

Hollander QC reviewed the relevant caselaw and dealt with the following issues:

1) Was the claimant entitled to be involved in instructing the expert? The expert determination clause did not provide that the parties should give joint instructions, nor that the claimant should be entitled to make representations (nor did it require the expert to have any particular expertise). Although there are remedies if an expert goes outside his mandate, in general the court will not interfere at a time when the expert has not yet been appointed. (However, the court can intervene to resolve a non-hypothetical dispute as to the mandate of the expert at the outset in certain circumstances).

2) Should the defendant be ordered to disclose certain documents to the claimant and the expert? The judge held that no such order should be made. It was for the expert to determine which documents he needed - the disclosure here was really required by the claimant and she would not be entitled to pass those documents to the expert (because the disclosure would be subject to a collateral undertaking in the usual way).

3) It was up to the International Chamber of Arbitration in Milan to specify the expertise or profession of the expert. Furthermore, it is up to the expert to decide the procedure for the determination.

COMMENT: Weekly Update 27/11 reported the decision in Barclays Bank v Nylon Capital, in which the Court of Appeal found that the court could decide any dispute as to the jurisdiction of an expert, even if a clause purported to confer that jurisdiction on the expert. The judge distinguished this case from Nylon Capital on the basis that there was no "well-defined dispute" here which would fall to be determined in advance of the expert's appointment.

WXY v Gewanter & Anor

Application to set aside judgment following non-attendance at trial

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2012/1490.html

The defendant applied under CPR r39.3 for an order setting aside judgment against him. He had failed to attend trial - he claimed because of a threat to the life/safety of his wife and family. His wife had received a photograph of herself with the words "we know - you have been warned" and she made an association between this and a photograph which she understood had been sent to a man who was conducting litigation involving someone close to the Claimant. That person had been murdered.

Slade J noted prior caselaw which has held that the court no longer has a broad discretion under CPR r39.3. Instead, it must be shown that the applicant has acted promptly, had a good reason for not attending trial and had a reasonable prospect of success at trial.

Although she found that the applicant had acted promptly (a delay of 3 weeks "in the context of a complex case" not amounting to a failure to act promptly), she found that the defendant failed on the other two grounds.

In relation to the threat, she found that there had been no advice from the police not to travel and the defendant had known that he could apply to participate in the hearing by video link. He had also made numerous unsuccessful applications to adjourn the proceedings. She found his true reason for non-attendance had been his unwillingness to face the claims against him.

Other News

On 21 May 2012, the Insurance Fraud Bureau published a press release announcing that it has launched a new insurance fraud register. The register will help insurers to identify fraudsters at the point of purchase:

http://www.insurancefraudbureau.org/files/press_release_ pdfs/ifb_appoints_andrew_buck_to_roll-out_insurance_ fraud_register.pdf

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nigel Brook
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.