UK: Miscellany - A Newsletter for Private Clients

Last Updated: 27 August 2002
Article by Vanessa Reburn

Once again, before the Budget, there were rumours of major inheritance tax changes and once again the rumours proved unfounded. So with this issue, we have included a reminder of the basic rules while they are still with us. Tax is not, of course, the only factor affecting inheritance, and the main newsletter looks at some of the other surrounding issues which could cause bad dreams...

Divorce and Inheritance

People are often concerned to know how a past or prospective inheritance will be treated on divorce. When the Court decides how the property of husband and wife should be divided it must have regard to the provisions of Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (the Act). This requires the Court to have regard to all circumstances, the first consideration being given to the welfare of any child under 18, and to have particular regard to eight sets of factors. The most relevant for present purposes are:

  • the income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources which each of the parties to the marriage has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future;
  • the financial needs, obligations and responsibilities which each of the parties has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future.

The Court has a wide discretion to tailor make orders which suit the circumstances of every family so that the outcome is, in each case, fair. Inheritance may be relevant in several situations.

Inherited -v- matrimonial property
First, a party may have brought into the marriage property which was inherited or acquired as a beneficiary under a trust. There is a view that this property should be treated differently from other matrimonial property. It is argued that, where inherited property still exists at the time of divorce, the spouse to whom it was given should be allowed to keep it. Conversely, the other spouse has a weaker claim to such property than he or she may have to matrimonial property. This issue was considered by the House of Lords in the case of White (discussed in our February 2001 issue).

Mr and Mrs White had been married for some 33 years during which they built up a successful farming partnership and, by the time of the divorce, had assets worth £4.6 million. Those assets did not, however, derive wholly from their own efforts. The Court found that without an initial loan from Mr White’s father, the young couple would have been unable to acquire their own farm when they did. Mr White also acquired one of the family’s farms on advantageous terms from his father. The House of Lords considered that in these circumstances, gifts to one party were a significant factor which resulted in Mr White receiving 20% more of their combined assets than Mrs White. It must be remembered that White was a case where the assets exceeded the parties’ reasonable requirements for housing and sufficient income to meet their respective needs. The House of Lords made it clear that where a claimant’s financial needs cannot be met without recourse to the property inherited by his/her spouse then the inheritance factor will carry very little weight.

Provision for children
Secondly, a party to a long marriage who is likely to be elderly, may seek an award which exceeds his or her reasonable requirements, so that he or she is in a position to make provision by Will for his or her adult children. The House of Lords in White decided that such a wish was not a financial need but, in circumstances where resources exceeded needs, the award should not be confined to living accommodation and a vanishing fund of capital earmarked for living expenses which would leave nothing to pass on. However, the precise amount which will be left to pass on will depend on the circumstances of each case.

Expecting to inherit?
Thirdly, there is an issue as to how the Court, at the time of divorce, should treat an expectation of inheritance at some time to come. This was considered by the Court of Appeal in the case of Michael. At the time of the Court hearing, to determine the financial and property issues, the matrimonial home was owned by Mrs Michael’s mother and Mrs Michael had a tenancy for which she paid rent. Mrs Michael’s mother was 60 years old and hypertensive. Although Mrs Michael had an expectation of inheriting an interest in the house under her mother’s Will, her prospects of inheriting it outright were uncertain and subject to the interests of other likely beneficiaries such as her father, her brothers and children. Mrs Michael also said that she was vulnerable to her mother changing her Will at a later stage. The Court of Appeal held that the wording of the Act was wide enough to allow them, in certain circumstances, to take account of a mere expectancy such as an interest which might be taken under the Will of a living person. However, the Court of Appeal held in this case that the considerable uncertainties were such that they could not conclude that there was any real possibility of Mrs Michael inheriting the property in the foreseeable future and this expectancy should not be taken into account. So far as the timing of any possible inheritance, the Judge remarked that "the world is full of women in their eighties who had high blood pressure in their sixties".

The Court will, though, take into account a party’s interest in the Will of a living person, for example, where that party’s parent is suffering a terminal illness and is highly unlikely to revoke the provision made in a Will for one of the parties. A similar situation occurred in the case of MT where the husband expected to inherit substantial capital from the estate of his father, a man of considerable wealth who was 83 years old. The husband’s father was a German national and, under German law, the husband would automatically be entitled to claim one eighth of his father’s estate. As there was no uncertainty that the husband would inherit but there was uncertainty as to the amount of the inheritance, the Court adjourned the wife’s claim for lump sum provision until the death of her father-in-law.

Whilst the relevance of inheritance (both received and to be received) will depend on the circumstances of each case, this issue can be significant when determining the appropriate division of family assets between spouses on divorce.
Mark Fenton

Inheriting Employees

On the death of an employer, personal representatives (PRs) will have to deal with the employees they "inherit" from the deceased. The main provisions of the law in this situation are to be found in s174 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 ("ERA").

There may be a number of different people in the deceased’s employment at the time of death. In the case of "domestic services", if the household continues, the new head of the household will be responsible for the employees. In the case of a family business or any other situation in which the deceased has employed people, the properly appointed executors will have responsibility.

Redundancy or continued employment?
The position under UK law is that an employer’s death terminates the contract and the employees will be automatically dismissed by reason of redundancy. Potentially, therefore, the employees are entitled to a redundancy payment. However, the general policy as stated in the ERA is that continued employment is to be preferred, especially if the business is to continue after the employer’s death. If the employment is to continue, PRs should, if possible, offer to renew the contract within eight weeks of the death. In this case the supposed dismissal "vanishes" and, on the face of it, so does the employees’ entitlement to a redundancy payment; otherwise PRs should make the redundancy position clear. If they simply keep the business ticking over without doing either, they are not necessarily committed to keeping the employees on, but the situation is less clear and it is good practice to consult as early as possible.

There has been some discussion as to whether the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 ("TUPE") apply to the transfer of an undertaking from the deceased to PRs. The ERA implies that the Regulations are not intended to apply so that the contracts do not transfer. However, legal authority is not clear on whether this is compatible with the European law that TUPE purports to implement.

The options for PRs
To conclude, an employee is potentially entitled to a redundancy payment from the deceased’s estate but cannot insist that he should be given continued employment. Nor does he have a claim for unfair dismissal. Nonetheless he might argue that in the light of the European law which TUPE purports to effect, his contract is preserved and therefore that the PRs’ refusal to re-employ him a constructive dismissal. So watch this space for a test case to the European Court on this issue and indeed the long-awaited amendments to TUPE.

It is important to have a proper consultation period and it may be wise to discuss with staff what their reasonable expectations would be upon the death of their employer. It may also be necessary to explain to domestic staff that the house may have to be sold or leased after their employer’s death.
Anna Gregory and Eliza Hebditch

The Missing Inheritance

Where one person relies on another’s promises or assurances and loses out as a result, there are a number of ways in which he can seek a remedy in the courts under a legal doctrine known as estoppel, which takes a variety of forms.

"One day all this will be yours"
One variant, proprietary estoppel, can affect inheritance. If A encourages B to act to B’s detriment, and gives credence to the belief that B may have some rights over A’s property, then A may have to make that good in some way.

So, if one person relies on the assurances of another along the lines of ‘one day all this will be yours’, acts to his detriment in reliance on the assurance, and then does not inherit after all, there may be a claim.

In a recent case, Jennings -v- Rice, the claimant had looked after his elderly employer for many years having been led to believe by her that he would inherit her estate. The employer died leaving her estate elsewhere. The court found that the claimant had indeed acted to his detriment in reliance on the expectation, and proprietary estoppel therefore operated to give him an interest in the employer’s estate.

How much is fair?
The next question was how to quantify the expectation – how much of the estate should he get? The trial judge held that the expectation did not extend to the entire estate (£1.3 million) as the claimant had no idea what the elderly lady owned other than the house in which they lived. The promise that ‘all this will be yours’ could therefore only extend to the house (£435,000). The claimant could not have expected to inherit property which he did not even know existed. In fact the award, upheld on appeal, was for £200,000. The valuation of the claimant’s entitlement depends on all the circumstances, including what he expected to receive and the extent to which he acted to his detriment, the financial circumstances of the claimant and the amount available, and the Court’s task was to ensure proportionality on the basis of all the facts and overall to do justice.

Not all disappointed beneficiaries can use this remedy, but in some cases it can be used to give a result which many would see as fair. Those who inherit under a Will should be aware that others might have a prior claim.
Joanna Tolhurst

Tying the Knot (or not?)

Over the past few decades there has been a marked decrease in the number of young couples who decide to tie the knot. People are generally marrying later in life and, indeed, many decide never to do so, choosing instead to live together as "common law spouses" – or so they might think.

This is, however, a popular misconception, since UK law does not currently recognise "common law marriages" – but, in a recent survey, 57% of the population believed that common law marriages are recognised in law, affording cohabiting couples the same rights as married couples.

More tax and fewer rights for unmarried couples
As a result of this lack of legal recognition unmarried couples enjoy none of the rights afforded to their married counterparts. In particular, there are great disparities in the way married and unmarried couples are taxed and also in the way the deceased partner’s estate is distributed if he or she dies leaving no Will. Sadly it is often only on the death of a partner that the surviving partner realises the full extent of these inequalities.

So what are these inequalities? Some of the main examples are shown in the table:

Event

Treatment for married couples

Treatment for unmarried couples

1. Death of one partner

All assets passing to surviving spouse (if UK domiciled) are exempt from inheritance tax ("IHT")

Entitlement to deceased spouse's state retirement pension

All assets passing to surviving partner are chargeable to IHT at the death rate

No entitlement to partner's retirement pension

2. Partner dies leaving no Will ("intestate")

Under the Intestacy Rules the surviving spouse receives an interest in the greater part of the deceased's estate

Surviving spouse has automatic right to act as Personal Representative to administer the deceased's estate

Surviving partner receives nothing under the Intestacy Rules

Surviving partner has no automatic right to at as a Personal Representative

3. Lifetime gift between partners

Gifts will be fully exempt from IHT and capital gains tax due to special spouse exemptions

No equivalent exemptions. Cohabiting couples are generally treated as unconnected individuals for taxation purposes

As you can see, if the deceased partner dies intestate, the surviving partner will have no right to a share in the deceased’s estate and may be left at the mercy of the deceased’s family. In the worst cases this has resulted in the surviving partner losing the family home and having no source of income.

Apart from the obvious inequalities arising on the death of a partner, there is also less scope for lifetime tax planning between unmarried partners who cannot make use of the spouse exemptions on lifetime transfers, which themselves open up further tax planning opportunities (see the example in the article "A Guide to Inheritance Tax").

Greater equality may be coming
Good news may, however, be on its way for unmarried couples. There are currently two Bills before Parliament proposing reform of the law relating to cohabitants: Lord Lester’s Civil Partnership Bill and Jane Griffith’s Relationships (Civil Registration) Bill. Both Bills provide for a system of partnership registration for same and opposite sex cohabitants and, upon registration, the couples would become entitled to various rights and duties. Lord Lester’s Bill has been put on hold until the Autumn, but Jane Griffith’s Bill is due for a second reading in the House of Commons on 19 July 2002.
Julia Richards

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.