UK: Supreme Court Rules On Owners’ Rights Of Remuneration Post-Withdrawal Under A Time Charter

Last Updated: 4 May 2012
Article by Michael Volikas, Jeremy Biggs and Catherine Earnshaw

Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. v. E.N.E. Kos 1 Limited [2012] UKSC 17

E.N.E. 1 Kos Limited v. Petroleo Brasilero S.A. [2010] EWCA Civ 772

In a judgment handed down on 2 May 2012, the UK Supreme Court has made a significant ruling on the rights of remuneration of the owners of a time-chartered ship after the ship has been lawfully withdrawn for non-payment of hire. The decision is particularly interesting for ship-owners and time charterers, since there is no previous direct authority on the issue in question.

The Supreme Court (Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke, Sumption LLJ) has held that the owners were entitled to compensation for the detention of the ship while the charterers' cargo remained onboard and for bunkers consumed after the ship was withdrawn, although Lord Mance differed from the remaining Law Lords as to the basis on which the owners were entitled to bring their claim.

The background facts

The M/T Kos was time chartered by her owners to the charterers for 36 months plus or minus 15 days at the charterers' option. The charterparty was on the Shelltime 3 form, containing a standard form of withdrawal clause providing that if hire was not paid when due (in this case, monthly in advance), the owners had the right to withdraw the vessel. Unusually, the charterparty contained no anti-technicality clause, requiring notice to be given before the right of withdrawal was exercised.

The vessel was delivered into the charterparty in July 2006. In June 2008, the owners withdrew the vessel when that month's hire instalment was not received in time. At the time of withdrawal, the vessel was at Angra dos Reis, Brazil, where she had been ordered to proceed by the charterers for discharge and back loading and where she had already taken on bunkers and loaded a parcel of cargo. Following withdrawal, there were a number of exchanges between the parties to try to resolve the situation to the satisfaction of both sides but these proved fruitless. Ultimately, the charterers made arrangements with the terminal to receive back the cargo which had just been loaded on board, which was then discharged. Had the charterers made arrangements for the discharge of their cargo as soon as they had received the owners' notice of withdrawal, the vessel would have been detained at Angra dos Reis for one day. Instead, she was detained there for 2.64 days (at a cost to the owners of US$410,274.00) and consumed some 80.11 mts of IFO at a cost of US$504.50/mt (US$40,415.00) before she was cargo free and sailed.

The owners claimed for the service of the vessel for those 2.64 days and for bunkers consumed during that period. This claim was put forward on the following four bases:

  1. Under clause 13 (employment and indemnity clause) in the charterparty;
  2. Under an express or implied new contract, made after the vessel was withdrawn, to pay for the time and bunkers;
  3. On the ground of unjust enrichment; and
  4. Under the law of bailment.

It should be noted also that the charterers had initially challenged the validity of the withdrawal and sought to assert a counterclaim against the owners for wrongful termination of the charterparty. As a result, they obtained from the owners a first class bank guarantee as security for the counterclaim, which the owners had provided in order to avoid the ship being arrested. In the event, the counterclaim was dismissed on summary judgment and the owners sought additionally an indemnity for the expenses they had incurred in providing and maintaining the bank guarantee.

The Commercial Court decision

We reported in detail on the decision of Mr Justice Andrew Smith in the Commercial Court in our October 2009 Shipping E-Brief (at In essence, the judge held that the owners were entitled to succeed in their claim for time and bunkers in their capacity as gratuitous bailees of the cargo. Relying on the House of Lords decision in The Winson [1982] AC 939, Mr Justice Andrew Smith held that the owners were entitled to be compensated for the costs incurred in fulfilling their duties as bailees, which costs extended to cover not only their out of pocket expenses but also the time incurred during the relevant period of bailment. As regards the bank guarantee expenses, the judge held that the owners could recover these pursuant to section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, which grants the court a discretion to award the "costs of and incidental to" proceedings in the High Court. Mr Justice Andrew Smith found that the original provision of the guarantee and the expenses of doing so were "incidental to" the proceedings within the meaning of section 51 and were, therefore, recoverable as litigation costs.

The Court of Appeal decision

On appeal, the Court of Appeal agreed with Mr Justice Andrew Smith that the owners should recover the bunkers consumed during discharge but found in favour of the charterers in respect of the owners' claim for remuneration for the 2.64 days spent at Angra dos Reis and the balance of bunkers consumed during this period.

With regard to the costs of putting up the guarantee, the Court of Appeal rejected the charterers' argument that if the costs incurred by the owners in having their ship under arrest are not recoverable as costs of the action, then the costs of putting up a guarantee should be equally irrecoverable. Rather, Sir Mark Waller stated that there was a distinction, albeit a narrow one, between the two types of expenditure. He concluded that the costs incurred by an owner of a ship arrested form the basis of a damages claim, whereas the costs of putting up a guarantee are akin to costs incurred to protect the subject matter of an action and are consequently costs "incidental to" the proceedings. This part of the Court of Appeal judgment stands as it was not appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court decision

New contract

Lord Sumption (with whom Lord Walker agreed) held that, on the facts, no new contract had come into existence between the parties after withdrawal. He, therefore, dismissed this basis for the claim.

Clause 13

Lord Sumption, however, rejected the charterers' argument that any delay or loss arising from the need to discharge the cargo resulted from the owners' decision to withdraw for their own commercial purposes and that they should consequently bear the adverse as well as the beneficial consequences of an optional decision made in their own interest. Rather, Lord Sumption confirmed that the reasons for the owners' withdrawal of the vessel were not a relevant factor impacting on their right to recover. The fact that they withdrew their vessel because it might have been in their commercial interest to do so was irrelevant for present purposes.

His Lordship went on to find that the owners' claim came within the scope of the indemnity in clause 13 of the charterparty. The indemnity was to protect the owners against losses arising from risks or costs which they had not expressly or implicitly agreed in the charterparty to bear and which were caused by complying with the charterers' orders. He held that the charterers' order to load the parcel of cargo which was on board the vessel when it was withdrawn was an effective cause of the owners' loss in the present case. The need to discharge the cargo in the owners' time arose from the fact that the cargo had been loaded pursuant to the charterers' orders and the purpose for which it had been loaded had come to an end with the termination of the charterparty. In simple terms, the cargo was on board because the charterers had put it there.

His Lordship added that, whilst it was fair to say that it was only because of the withdrawal of the vessel that the subsequent discharge at Angra dos Reis had to be done in the owners' time and without earning contractual hire, that was the very reason why the detention of the vessel fell within the indemnity. The need to discharge the cargo in the owners' time and at their expense was not an ordinary incident of the chartered service and was not a risk that the owners assumed under the contract. It arose after the chartered service had come to an end in accordance with the withdrawal clause in the contract.

Lord Sumption held, therefore, that the whole of the 2.64 days during which the vessel was detained resulted from the cargo being on board on the charterers' orders at the time of the withdrawal and that the owners were entitled to recover the market rate of hire for those 2.64 days. He also held that they were entitled to the value of bunkers consumed during the whole period of detention.


Whilst this conclusion made it unnecessary to address the owners' case on bailment, Lord Sumption nonetheless proposed to deal with the question whether the owners were also entitled to succeed at common law as non-contractual bailees of the cargo after the withdrawal of the vessel. He held that they did. His Lordship distinguished between cases where there was no previous contractual relationship between the parties and the present case where the original bailment of the cargo had occurred under the charterparty contract. Relying on The Winson, he held that the circumstances which entitled the owners to recover in bailment in the present case were that: (i) the cargo was originally bailed to the owners under a contract which came to an end while the cargo was still in their possession; (ii) as a matter of law, their obligation to look after the cargo continued notwithstanding the termination of the charterparty; and (iii) the only reasonable or practical option open to them once the charterparty had come to an end was to retain the cargo until it could be discharged at the port where the vessel was then located.

Unjust enrichment

Finally, as regards the case on unjust enrichment, Lord Sumption thought that the owners might be entitled to succeed on this basis also but decided not to make a conclusive determination on this aspect.

Lord Mance

Lord Phillips concurred with Lord Sumption as did Lord Clarke. Lord Mance, on the other hand, agreed that the owners were entitled to recover for their claim in bailment but disagreed with the majority that the claim fell within the indemnity in clause 13. In his view, an indemnity like clause 13 only applies where there is a direct causal link between the orders and the consequences and that, pursuant to cases such as The White Rose [1969] 1 WLR 1098, it was necessary to establish "an unbroken chain of causation". In Lord Mance's view, the owners' loss was not suffered as a result of complying with the time charterers' instructions, rather it was caused because the charter was at an end. He held, therefore, that the direct or unbroken causal link required was lacking in this case.

Lord Phillips

Lord Phillips agreed with Lord Mance that there must be a causal link between the order and the consequences relied on and no break in the chain of causation between the two. He disagreed though with any suggestion that there can only be one cause. Rather, depending on the circumstances, he stated that there may be more than one effective cause for a loss and that, in the present case, there were two effective causes of the owners' expense and loss, namely the withdrawal and the fact that the cargo had been loaded. In those circumstances, he saw no reason why the claim for an indemnity under clause 13 should not succeed.


The judgment provides very interesting clarification in relation to the scope of contractual indemnities in a time charter context and the rights and responsibilities arising out of a non-contractual bailment where a time charter has come to an end.

A perhaps unusual feature of the case was that no bill of lading had been issued, with the charterers remaining the owners of the cargo. It remains to be seen what effect the issue of a bill of lading and ownership of the cargo by persons other than the charterers might have in similar circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.