UK: BIS Consults On Private Actions In Competition Law

On 24 April 2012, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) launched a consultation on how best to encourage damages actions based on breaches of competition law.  At present, the level of these claims is very low in the UK.  Current disincentives against bringing such claims include the difficulties and expense of going to court and the fact that although large sums may be at stake, they are spread across many businesses or consumers with each one having lost only a small amount.

BIS' proposals focus on four areas:

  • extending the remit of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) for competition damages actions in the UK;
  • introducing an opt-out collective actions regime for competition damages claims;
  • promoting Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to ensure the courts are the option of last resort; and
  • protecting the incentive to blow the whistle on cartels ('leniency').

Extending the CAT's remit

Currently the CAT can only hear competition damages claims where there exists a prior decision that competition law has been infringed (e.g. a Competition Act 1998 infringement decision by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) or an Article 101 TFEU infringement decision by the European Commission).  These are known as follow-on claims.

BIS' proposals include:

  • the CAT should be able to hear competition damages claims where there is no prior infringement decision ("stand-alone claims");
  • allowing the High Court to transfer cases (or parts of cases) alleging competition law infringement to the CAT;
  • giving the CAT the ability to hear applications for injunctions.  BIS believes that frequently redress and damages are less important to the claimant than simply causing the anticompetitive activity to stop;
  • introducing a 'fast-track' procedure in the CAT for competition damages claims.  This would: (i) allow swift granting of interim injunctions; (ii) allow cross-undertakings for damages to be waived or limited; (iii) aim to hear cases with six months of their being laid; (iv) resolve issues on paper wherever possible; (v) keep oral hearings to a minimum; (vi) have no or limited court fees; and (vii) cap liability for defendants' costs (up to a maximum of £25,000).

BIS is also considering whether to make it easier for claimants to quantify the losses they have suffered due to a cartel by introducing a rebuttable presumption of loss.  This would be likely to take the form of a presumption (which could be disproved by either side) that a cartel had affected prices by a fixed amount e.g. 20%.  This represents a radical departure from the current position, where the onus to quantify loss is on the claimant, who often lacks precise information to enable him to carry out a overcharge analysis.

In addition, BIS is inviting comments on issues relating to the passing on defence, relevant to business to business claims.  The passing on defence could allow a defendant to show that the claimant had in fact suffered no loss on the basis that the claimant passed on any cartel price overcharge to someone who bought goods/services from him (an indirect purchaser).  BIS is considering whether the passing on defence should be dealt with directly in legislation, either explicitly allowing it or forbidding it, or introducing some kind of rebuttable presumption. However, overall BIS takes the view that any clarification of the use of the passing on defence should be dealt with at EU level, in the context, for example, of any further deliberations by the European Commission on damages actions for breaches of the antitrust rules.

Opt-out collective actions

Currently in the UK collective actions regarding breaches of competition law are open only to consumers.  Such actions must be brought by particular representative bodies based on a previous infringement decision (i.e. follow-on cases only).  They are 'opt-in' actions.  To date, there has only been one such claim (Which?'s case against JJB Sports in relation to replica football shirts). 

Opt-in means that individuals must actively election to join the action.  Opt-out means that all parties who fall within the definition of the represented group are bound by the outcome of the case unless they actively opt out of the action.

BIS is seeking views on:

  • whether to introduce a CAT opt-out collective actions regime for competition law redress, covering both businesses and consumers, for both follow-on and stand-alone claims;
  • how to prevent speculative or unmeritorious claims; and
  • who should be permitted to bring such actions, with those under consideration including individual companies and consumers, representative bodies, legal firms, third party funders and public sector bodies.

BIS emphasises that these considerations relate only to competition law and that it does not favour the introduction of a generic collective redress mechanism covering all sectors either in the UK or at EU level.

Encouraging ADR

BIS is minded to ensure that courts and the OFT can use ADR wherever suitable, and to encourage private and third sector bodies to provide further forms of ADR to reflect any change in the number or nature of private actions. It is seeking views on:

  • whether mediation should be purely voluntary, mandatory, or a default but non-mandatory approach;
  • whether pre-action protocols should be introduced for competition cases in the CAT, and if so, what forms these should take;
  • whether the competition authorities should be given a power to order a company found guilty of a competition law infringement to implement a redress scheme, or certify a voluntary redress scheme. Such redress schemes would be a new feature in the competition landscape and would be in addition to fines/other sanctions imposed by competition authorities.

Protecting leniency

When a company involved in a cartel blows the whistle on that cartel to a competition authority, it may qualify for leniency - immunity from fines (or a substantial reduction in fines).  This is the way that competition authorities discover the majority of cartels.

When it blows the whistle, a cartel member is admitting its involvement in a breach of competition law.  A claim for leniency involves the disclosure of substantial information about the activities of the whistle blower and its cartel associates.  The whistle blower may be particularly concerned that its opening up to the competition authority also opens it up to private actions for damages.  The question of whether companies can be forced to release documents created in relation to leniency is currently a hot topic.  Recent EU and UK level cases have held that such documents are indeed candidates for disclosure, subject in each case to a balancing exercise between national law and interests protected by EU law.  This changes the incentives for whistleblowing. 

BIS is minded to protect certain aspects of leniency documents from disclosure.  Its current thinking is that documents directly involved in the leniency application and which would not have been created if the company had not sought leniency should be protected.  However, it requests views on the precise details of which documents should be protected and which should be disclosed.

Another area raised by the BIS consultation is whether whistleblowers should be protected from the joint and several liability that currently exists between cartel members for damages awarded.  This would mean that whistleblowers' liability would be limited to the damage they cause, not the entirety of damages caused by the cartel.  BIS notes that there are complexities in how to extend this protection to other leniency applicants, such as those that receive less than 100% immunity from fines.

Next steps

The consultation raises many wide-ranging issues and is open for submissions until 24 July 2012.  Several of the options raised represent a radical departure from the current position.  The proposals for opt-out collective actions and for a presumption of loss (albeit rebuttable) in cartel cases will be particularly controversial.  This consultation is also emerging at a time when a European Commission consultation on similar issues is expected.

This is an important opportunity to make your views known and influence the future shape of competition litigation in the UK.  Please contact us if you wish to discuss further the issues arising. 

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 25/04/2012.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions