UK: Pre-action Protocols

Last Updated: 7 August 2002
Article by Martin Thomas

Pre-action Protocols were introduced as part of the Woolf Reforms in 1999. The intention was that, by requiring parties to enter into a formal exchange of correspondence setting out their respective positions in relation to claims, and providing where appropriate for the disclosure of documents and witness evidence, the parties could properly evaluate their cases at an early stage and potentially settle their differences without actually needing to issue proceedings. That would save the parties money and reduce the administrative burden on courts.

Of course, prior to 1999, it was common for the claimants to write letters before action, the purpose of a Protocol is to take that a stage further and in particular to require a formal response.

The framework

The procedural rules relating to Protocols are set out in the Pre-action Protocol Practice Direction. There are, however, relevant passages elsewhere in the CPR. In particular, Part 44, which deals with the question of recoverability of costs, contains specific references to pre-action behaviour and correspondence; and Part 31 contains provisions for pre-action disclosure. Both of those Parts are referred to in more detail below.

Is there a Pre-action Protocol?

The rules on pre-action behaviour differ according to whether there is an approved Protocol in place. At present there are compulsory Protocols for the following:

  • Personal injury claims
  • Clinical disputes
  • Defamation
  • Construction & Engineering disputes
  • Judicial Review
  • Professional negligence

There are also a number of draft Protocols (e.g. for debt claims) whose use is not compulsory. The Lord Chancellor’s Department also recently circulated a paper for consultation relating to a general Protocol which it is intended would apply to all disputes.

What is the effect of a Protocol?

Whilst the details of each Protocol, naturally, vary according to circumstances, the general structure is as follows

  • The claimant is to send a brief letter indicating the nature of the claim, including the remedies sought, as soon as practicable after the issue arises.
  • That is followed by a detailed letter of claim.
  • The proposed defendant is to acknowledge receipt of the above, usually within 14 days.
  • The proposed defendant is to provide a detailed reply to the detailed claim within a further timescale, usually 3 months.
  • There is provision for pre-action disclosure by both parties.
  • The detailed reply by the defendant should indicate, if the claim is denied, the detailed basis of the Defence.
  • The detailed response from the defendant may also include an offer to mediate in which case a further time period for mediation comes into play.

Whilst it is the intention that each party is able to conduct a proper evaluation of the case being made against it, so that some degree of precision is necessary, the Protocols specifically warn against duplicating, in correspondence, the formal pleadings process, the costs of which the whole concept is designed to avoid.

It is clear from the above that the entire procedure from start to finish is likely to take at least 6 months. Time can generally be cut short only where one party fails to comply with the protocol or there is some overriding requirement which makes it reasonable to reduce the applicable time.

What if a party ignores the Protocol?

Under the Protocol Practice Direction, paragraphs 2.2 – 2.4, failure to comply with a compulsory Protocol resulting in unnecessary proceedings or issues being issued or litigated can lead to either;

  • an Order for costs against the offending party, possibly on an indemnity basis (and regardless if they are successful on the main claim); or
  • where monetary payment is involved, an increase or reduction (depending on whether the offending party is paying or receiving) in the interest rates applicable to the payment.

It is stated that the object of applying these penalties is to leave the innocent party in no worse position than if the Protocol had been followed.

It will be noticed at once that in order to establish these penalties it is necessary not only to show that the Protocol was not followed, but also that the litigation would otherwise have been avoided. That is going to be difficult if the matter has been pursued to trial. It seems likely that these provisions will only bite where one party concedes the case or an issue as a result of a disclosure or clarification in the course of proceedings which would have been made earlier if the Protocol procedure had been followed in the first place.

What happens if there is no Protocol?

Where there is no compulsory Protocol, the Protocol Practice Direction, paragraph 4, says that the Court will require the parties to act reasonably "in accordance with the overriding objective" in exchanging information and documents and generally in trying to avoid a necessity for the start of proceedings.

In other words the indication is that even if there is no actual Protocol in place, the parties should at least to some extent act as though there was. There are no specific penalties for failing to comply with this provision, but Part 44 which deals with the assessment of costs, specifically directs the Courts to have regard to the question of whether the parties have conducted themselves reasonably, both before and after the issue of proceedings and in relation to the proceedings themselves and individual issues. The implication is that where parties have not at least attempted the rudiments of Protocol exchanges of information prior to issuing proceedings, there could be a costs penalty. This factor is to be borne in mind both when deciding responsibility for costs in the first place and also in subsequently assessing those costs.

Protocols and pre-action disclosure

Part 31, which deals with disclosure of documents generally, also provides for the disclosure of documents prior to the commencement of proceedings. A party making such an application has to establish that there is likely to be litigation between it and the other party, that the documents sought would form part of standard disclosure within that dispute, and that in the circumstances the Court should exercise its discretion to order disclosure.

There is no specific cross-reference in Part 31 to the existence or otherwise of Protocols. The Protocols, however, state that their provisions do not override Part 31. It seems likely, therefore, that when applying for disclosure under Part 31 the Court will have regard to whether or not a Protocol is in place and, if so, its terms.

What is the Effect of all This in Practice?

Anecdotal evidence suggests that the Protocol procedure is not, in the main, working in the way it was intended. Claimants are commonly criticised for using the protocol procedure to "fish" for evidence of claims, defendants for using it to drag out the time before proceedings can be issued, presumably in the hope that the delay and cost will encourage the claimant to settle on unfavourable terms or to lose interest altogether. There is also a tendency to replicate the pleadings process by requiring ever more precise details of exactly what is alleged, rather than engaging with the actual issues and trying to narrow them.

In April 2002 a survey commissioned by the Law Society and the Civil Justice Council was published. It was intended to assess pre-action behaviour in personal injury, clinical negligence and housing claims and involved interviews with lawyers, as well as a comparative study of 300 pre and post Woolf personal injury case files. The results are therefore only relevant in these areas, and the files studied tended to involve smaller claims and the fast track procedure (a simpler procedure than the multi-track procedure used for high value, complex commercial cases). The results found that, in general, the protocols have been well received. However, in all of the three areas studied, there were underlying criticisms of the protocols, including: opponents fail to reply to a letter of claim or reply late; there are a lack of sanctions on those who fail to act reasonably; deadlines set by the protocols are not realistic; and they result in an increased front-loading of costs, as well as an overall increase in costs. The results also showed that there was no change in the overall timescale of cases being resolved; and while there may have been an increase in the quality of information provided, there was no reduction in the quantity of correspondence between the parties. Finally, while the prospects of settlement may have improved due to the protocols procedure, there was not much empirical evidence of this in the files studied in the survey.

Clearly in some cases the pre-action process may result in an early recognition of the strengths and weaknesses of the parties respective arguments and a settlement through mediation or otherwise. In the majority of cases, however, the result is simply that the parties have to indulge in an expensive and protracted exchange of correspondence, all of which is duplicated when proceedings are finally issued and Statements of Case are actually served.

© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions