UK: New UK Competition And Markets Authority: What’s In A Name?

Last Updated: 16 April 2012
Article by Dechert’s Antitrust/Competition Group

Key Points

As of 2014, there will be one national Competition and Markets Authority.

Merger Control

  • The UK merger control regime will remain voluntary.
  • The operations of the Office of Fair Trading and Competition Commission will be merged under the Competition and Markets Authority.
  • It is yet to be determined whether the case team will remain the same in both between Phase One and Phase Two investigations.
  • Decision makers will remain separate for Phase One and Phase Two investigations.


  • To improve enforceability and levels of prosecution the "dishonesty element" will be removed from the offence.
  • A new safe harbour will be introduced providing protection to companies if they publish in the London Gazette (or a similar publication) business arrangements before they are implemented. A limited disclosure to customers of arrangements which could fall foul of competition law, but which have other countervailing benefits may also trigger the availability of the safe harbour.



On 16 March 2011, the UK government's Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) launched a consultation proposing a number of reforms to the UK competition regime. After considering the responses on its proposals from interested stakeholders, the BIS released its final response on 15 March 2012. In a retreat from a wide array of changes proposed in the initial consultation, the number of changes actually endorsed is relatively limited. This DechertOnPoint focuses on the following significant changes:

  • Procedural updates to the UK merger control system;
  • The merging of the existing UK competition authorities to create one single over-arching body: the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA); and
  • Amendments to the criminal cartel offence to increase the prospect of successful prosecution.

The Consultation

The consultation was part of the UK government's plan to support and encourage economic growth by overhauling and strengthening the UK competition regime to eliminate inefficiencies and make the regime more predictable for businesses.

The government received 115 responses from organisations including SMEs and large enterprises, representative organisations, Government organisations, legal and academic bodies and other interested parties on different aspects of the proposed amendments.

Merger Control Updates

The Current System

In the UK, the current merger control regime is voluntary. This means that even if the relevant jurisdictional thresholds are met, it is not mandatory to notify the transaction to the UK competition authorities. The jurisdictional thresholds for notification in the UK consist of two alternative tests:

  • Share of supply: the merger would create or enhance a 25% share of any market in the UK; or
  • Turnover: the target's turnover is over GBP 70 million in the UK.

If either threshold is met, parties to a transaction should consider whether it is necessary to notify the transaction to the UK authorities in light of the substantive issues raised by the transaction and/or of the desire for legal certainty. These thresholds will not change.

As the regime is voluntary, parties are free to close the transaction prior to obtaining regulatory clearance. This is in contrast to the other 26 European Member States and the majority of other competition regimes around the world, which have mandatory and suspensive regimes. In most countries, if the jurisdictional thresholds are met, the transaction must be notified and cannot close before regulatory clearance is obtained.

In practice, a large number of transactions are notified by parties to the UK authorities to gain legal certainty. This is because if the transaction is not notified, the UK's Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has the power to launch a review of the deal up to four months after closing becomes public. In these circumstances, the OFT will normally request that businesses cease further integration through "hold-separate undertakings". If businesses do not agree to cease integration, the OFT can seek enforcement of these hold-separate arrangements through the courts.

One of the options put forward under the consultation was to make the UK merger control regime mandatory and suspensive under the consultation. This was unpopular with respondents who argued that there was insufficient evidence to justify a fundamental change to the mergers regime. Additionally, any type of mandatory notification would significantly increase costs to both business and the competition authorities and would go against the Government's objectives of promoting growth and reducing regulation. A mandatory regime was therefore not adopted by the BIS in its response and the merger regime will remain voluntary. However, the CMA will have the new authority to order that parties enter into hold-separate arrangements while it conducts its review, without the need to go to court. The CMA will additionally have the power to impose a maximum penalty of up to 5% of aggregate group worldwide turnover of each enterprise should companies continue with integration measures in breach of a CMA order.

The Review Process

Currently in the UK there are two main bodies concerned with regulating merger transactions: the OFT and the Competition Commission (CC).

The OFT is the body which currently deals with all mergers in the first instance — "Phase One" investigation. If, following the OFT's initial assessment, it considers that a merger is likely to cause a "substantial lessening of competition" in the UK, the OFT is obliged to refer the case to the CC for review — "Phase Two" investigation. The CC then performs a second, independent review on the transaction, before giving a final decision as to whether the transaction will be cleared without restriction, cleared with restrictions (e.g. remedies such as divestiture) or blocked (the latter is very rare in practice).

Unlike the process used by the European Commission, where the case team (i.e. the team of Commission lawyers and economists that conduct the case investigation and make the enforcement decisions) remains the same in both Phase One and Phase Two, the UK's use of two separate authorities is intended to provide a system of checks and balances. This separation of powers means there is less likelihood of so-called 'confirmation bias', whereby the same decision makers may seek unjustifiably to affirm the existence of issues identified at Phase One during a Phase Two investigation. A key drawback of having two separate authorities for Phase One and Phase Two inquiries is that businesses are required to spend extra time and money educating two separate authorities.

The New Competition and Markets Authority: What's in a Name?

In order to increase the efficiency of the competition regime, the functions currently being performed by the OFT and the CC in isolation, will be transferred to a single body — the CMA.

Practical Implications: Case Teams

Under the current system, the case teams conducting the Phase One and Phase Two reviews are different. It has been left for the CMA to establish its own principles as to whether case teams will now be uniform and continue from Phase

One to Phase Two or whether they will remain separate. It seems likely that increased efficiency will only be achieved if the CMA decides that the same case team will be used throughout. If this option is chosen, it will no longer be necessary to educate two separate teams about the transaction, which should create efficiencies and save time.

If the CMA decides to continue using separate case teams for Phase One and Phase Two, as under the current system, it is difficult to envisage how significant efficiency gains or time saving will be achieved in the review process.

New Decision Making Structure

The CMA will be split into the CMA Board and independent Panels.

Phase One Decision Maker: CMA Board

The CMA Board will be comprised of a Chief Executive Officer, Non Executive Chair, executives and non-executives. Like the current OFT, the CMA Board will be responsible for Phase One decisions and overall strategy, performance, rules and guidance on the process.

Phase Two Decision Maker: Independent Panels

These independent Panels will take over the function currently being performed by the CC and be responsible for Phase Two merger and market decisions and regulatory appeals. A mix of full and part-time individuals appointed by the Secretary of State will form a pool of panelists. Each Panel will be comprised of a number of relevant independent experts, taken from the pool, who will then investigate and report on a specific inquiry.

The use of separate decision makers for each phase is in effect a continuation of the existing UK merger process and should help to ensure that there remain sufficient checks and balances to protect the parties from 'confirmation bias'. However, as previously pointed out, if there is no uniformity of case team the reforms simply continue the status quo under a new name. In other words, it is difficult to pinpoint at this stage how exactly the reforms increase efficiency. Moreover, the current time limits of 40 working days for Phase One decisions and 24 weeks for Phase Two decisions will remain in place (although both will become statutory), which is not indicative of a more efficient and streamlined process.


Currently, any party (including interested third parties) aggrieved by an OFT or CC decision may appeal to the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) for a judicial review of the decision.

All CMA decisions will remain subject to a possible full merits appeal to the CAT.

Undertakings in Lieu of Referral to the CC

Currently the OFT cannot accept undertakings, aimed at mitigating any competition issues in lieu of a referral to the CC prior to deciding to refer the transaction for Phase Two review. There is currently no formal timetable for offering undertakings.

Subsequent to the consultation, following a Phase One decision the parties will now have a maximum of 90 working days in total to offer and agree with the CMA undertakings in lieu of referral to Phase Two. This means that the parties can offer acceptable remedies or amendments to the terms of the transaction to the CMA, so that the transaction will be cleared at the end of Phase One without having to spend time and costs progressing to a Phase Two investigation.


At the moment the merger fees payable range from £30,000 to £90,000, depending on the type and size of the acquisition.

These fees will now be based on the UK turnover of the enterprise being acquired and will be increased to range from £40,000 to £160,000.


Current System

Unlike the EU, the UK has a criminal cartel offence which was introduced in 2003 by the Enterprise Act. The offence states that "an individual is guilty ... if he dishonestly agrees with one or more other persons to make or implement [prohibited] arrangements [e.g. price fixing] ... relating to at least two undertakings". To date there have only been two prosecutions under the offence. One of these prosecutions was settled by means of a plea arrangement, the other was unsuccessful due to procedural irregularities.1 This very modest record of enforcement may be explained at least in part by the difficulty in proving the "dishonesty" element, as it is necessary to show that the offender had knowledge that he was committing a crime in breach of competition law.


Following the consultation, the "dishonesty" element will be removed from the offence in order to improve enforceability, increase the number of prosecutions, and enhance its deterrent effect. Proof of intent, i.e. that the individual knew that he was entering into the agreement and knew of its operation, will still be required, but not that he knew it was illegal and dishonest.

It is intended that a safe harbour be introduced if companies make customers aware of business arrangements being entered into, i.e. where they have been published in the London Gazette (or similar publication) before they are implemented. It is not necessary for legitimate arrangements to be published, but where parts of an arrangement fall within the scope of the amended offence, whilst still presenting certain countervailing benefits, a company will now be required to disclose the offending provisions. Other non-offending provisions may be kept confidential.

This new "safe harbour approach" seems somewhat burdensome on companies. The changes necessarily require that businesses must undertake an analysis to determine whether an agreement it enters into may fall under the remit of competition laws. This is not in itself a bad thing, but practically speaking it puts companies into the position of needing to make an evaluation of the risks and rewards of such notification, which may require serious consideration in close cases.

Possible Alternative

An alternative would have been to adopt a US style criminal cartel offence. In the US, certain agreements constitute per se violations (because they contain no redeeming features which are pro-competitive) and it is these agreements which fall within the scope of the offence. Per se violations are generally agreements amongst competitors to restrict competition with respect to prices, output, customers or geographic markets. In the US, cartel law is judge made, and the scope of the US offence is established and developed by case law, rather than through an exhaustive list drafted by legislators.

The US system has been successfully implemented and is serving its purpose in deterring cartel behaviour, with numerous successful prosecutions.

It remains to be seen whether the changes made to the UK criminal cartel offence will be as successful.

Next Steps

Where changes in primary legislation are needed, such as the creation of the CMA, the government intends to have the relevant measures passed and operational by April 2014. The remaining measures will be implemented gradually.


1. R v Whittle and others [2008] EWCA Crim 2560, R v G and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1148.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.