UK: Sexual Infidelity And Loss Of Control: R V Clinton (Jon-Jacques) [2012] EWCA Crim 2

Last Updated: 11 April 2012

Article by Adam Bond, pupil at 6 Kings Bench Walk


1. On 25th October 2011, the Court of Appeal (Lord Chief Justice, Henriques J., Gloster J.) issued its judgment in R v Clinton (Jon-Jacques) [2012] EWCA Crim 2. Under consideration, inter alia, was the application of the statutory provisions for the partial defence to murder of loss of self-control, formerly the common law defence of provocation, contained in sections 54 and 55 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 ("the 2009 Act").

2. The defence of loss of control is placed entirely on a statutory footing by the 2009 Act, the previous authorities on provocation now being irrelevant. The defence has three elements: (i) causal nexus between the killing and loss of control, (ii) a 'qualifying trigger' (further defined by section 55 of the Act) and (iii) a comparison of the defendant's reaction to the hypothetical reaction of another who shares some of his/her characteristics and circumstances, section 54(1) of the 2009 Act.

3. Clinton is primarily concerned with the application of the "qualifying trigger" provisions. Section 55(4) provides "Things said or done (or both) by another may be a "qualifying trigger" where they:

  1. Constituted circumstances of an extremely grave character, and

  2. Caused the defendant to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged.

4. In considering "things said or done" for the purposes of section 55(4) "the fact that a thing done or said consisted sexual infidelity is to be disregarded", section 55(6)(c).

Case Summary

5. The appellant was convicted at the Crown Court in Reading for the murder of his wife. His evidence was that prior to the fatal attack his wife explained that she had sex with a number of men during a trial separation in their marriage. Judge Smith directed herself that this evidence was "things said or done constituting sexual infidelity" and therefore to be disregarded for the purposes the partial defence. There being no other 'triggers' for the loss of self-control the defence was not considered by the jury. The correctness of this decision formed the basis of the appeal.

6. Several problems faced the Court: (i) the definition of "sexual infidelity", (ii) how a "thing said" can itself "constitute" sexual infidelity and (iii) the extent of the prohibition where sexual infidelity is relevant context to other potential triggers. The Court of Appeal made reference to Hansard, however, the parliamentary debates were of scant guidance in the interpretation of this "formidably difficult provision".

7. The Court, faced with the fundamental problem that sexual infidelity is not defined in the statute or clarified in Parliamentary debate, itself avoided defining the term(s) while highlighting this latent difficulty [para.19]. The Court stopped short of adopting the submission of counsel that infidelity was the breach of mutual understanding that is to be inferred or expressly found within the relationship. Rather, the greatest elucidation of infidelity is that it "appears to involve a relationship between the two people to which one party may be unfaithful" [para.17]. As the relationship here was marriage the Court was not required to consider what types or 'seriousness' of relationship give rise to a duty of sexual fidelity and on what basis, subjective or objective, this belief in a duty of sexual fidelity is assessed.

8. As to 'sexual' the Court recognised that whereas it is straightforward for an act to be sexual, "things said" poses far greater difficulty. The Court drew on the example of the words "I love you" but in its discussion refrained from determining if this is "sexual" for the purposes of the 2009 Act. However, it is clear that words admitting or detailing sexual acts will be "sexual" things said. Therefore an individual admitting a sexual affair will have said a "sexual" thing whereas the position remains uncertain for an emotional affair (such as "I love another").

9. Notwithstanding the Court's avoidance of fully defining "sexual" or "infidelity" it held that admissions of a sexual affair in the context of marriage, or reports of such by third parties, were things said which "constituted" sexual infidelity. The truthfulness of these admissions or reports is irrelevant [para.26]. The difference between things said "constituting" sexual infidelity, such as admission and reports, and words falling short of 'constituting' such infidelity is the context, namely; the relationship of the parties, and the person by whom and to whom the circumstances in which the words are spoken [para.25].

10. The Court was alive to potential injustices resulting from the application of the exclusionary rule to unrealistically compartmentalise sexual infidelity so as to remove evidence before the jury that is integral to the facts as a whole. Therefore it is only where sexual infidelity is the "only potential trigger" that the evidence is to be disregarded. However, where sexual infidelity "is integral to and forms an essential part of the context" in which another trigger properly falls to be considered the exclusionary rule does not operate. The Court drew on the example of a wife returning to find her husband raping her sister. The sexual conduct constitutes sexual infidelity, excluded as a trigger, and rape, which is a separate potential trigger. The Court concluded that so long as the sexual infidelity is not the exclusive basis for the loss of control it is relevant context to the evaluation of other potential triggers.

11. Further, in considering whether a person in the circumstances of the defendant would have reacted in the same or a similar way (section 54(1)(c)) sexual infidelity will be a relevant circumstance [para.37].


12. Both "sexual" and "infidelity" are difficult terms requiring definition or exposition for the proper understanding of the statutory defence. The Court was not required to differentiate between sexual infidelity and what might be more properly considered as 'emotional infidelity' (the 'I love you' example) as this was not in issue. The definition of 'sexual' may be easier to address than 'infidelity' as criminal courts are well versed in dealing with sexual offences. Section 78 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 defines "sexual", for the purposes of that Act, applying an objective standard taking into account the nature, purposes and circumstances of the act. This definition is concerned with physical acts, namely "penetration, touching or any other activity", therefore its adoption would limit the scope of the exclusionary rule for loss of self-control.

13. This definition would accord with the Court's finding that an admission of an (physical) affair constitutes "sexual" infidelity. It would, however, result in the words "I love you" not being "sexual" given the words themselves do not relate to any activity that may be assessed as sexual or non-sexual. Applying this interpretation to the example used by the Court, a woman overhearing her partner say "I love you" to another woman (emotional infidelity) would have the defence available, however, actually finding her husband in flagrante (sexual infidelity) and killing without more would prima facie not be a relevant trigger to a loss of self-control.

14. It is perhaps a trite point that "sexual" infidelity is almost inexorably bound up with "emotional" infidelity (although the reverse need not necessarily be true). The Court recognised that the loss of self-control often stems not from the mere fact of sexual infidelity, rather 'the betrayal and heartbreak, and crushed dreams' it represents. Again, taking a narrow approach to 'sexual infidelity' it could reasonably be argued that finding a partner in flagrante was not the trigger, rather it was the fact of the betrayal, which would be analogous to the betrayal in the "I love another (but have not had any sexual relations with them)" example. As with the Court's example of the woman finding her husband raping her sister sexual conduct can constitute more than simply 'sexual infidelity'.

15. As soon as a notion of emotional infidelity arises, and it might be expected this would be common, then this is another potential trigger for which sexual infidelity, on the reasoning of Clinton may be relevant context. Indeed a literal reading of the provision, as suggested by Omerod, is that it is only the fact of the thing said or done constituting sexual infidelity, not the effect of such things said or done, which is to be disregarded. Therefore, the exclusionary provision could be restricted to all but a narrow seam of cases where the loss of self-control was solely a result of the act or things said constituting sexual infidelity, not the effects and emotional repercussion thereof.


16. The judgment in Clinton is an effort to make sense of problematic legislation. While practitioners will glean some guidance from Clinton the scope of "sexual infidelity" remains wholly unclear and is likely to require further attention by the Court of Appeal. One approach is to narrowly define 'sexual' and continue to allow 'sexual infidelity' to be considered as relevant context where another potential trigger is present; such an approach may welcomingly restrict the application of section 55(6)(c) within practicable bounds.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions