UK: Sexual Infidelity And Loss Of Control: R V Clinton (Jon-Jacques) [2012] EWCA Crim 2

Last Updated: 11 April 2012

Article by Adam Bond, pupil at 6 Kings Bench Walk


1. On 25th October 2011, the Court of Appeal (Lord Chief Justice, Henriques J., Gloster J.) issued its judgment in R v Clinton (Jon-Jacques) [2012] EWCA Crim 2. Under consideration, inter alia, was the application of the statutory provisions for the partial defence to murder of loss of self-control, formerly the common law defence of provocation, contained in sections 54 and 55 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 ("the 2009 Act").

2. The defence of loss of control is placed entirely on a statutory footing by the 2009 Act, the previous authorities on provocation now being irrelevant. The defence has three elements: (i) causal nexus between the killing and loss of control, (ii) a 'qualifying trigger' (further defined by section 55 of the Act) and (iii) a comparison of the defendant's reaction to the hypothetical reaction of another who shares some of his/her characteristics and circumstances, section 54(1) of the 2009 Act.

3. Clinton is primarily concerned with the application of the "qualifying trigger" provisions. Section 55(4) provides "Things said or done (or both) by another may be a "qualifying trigger" where they:

  1. Constituted circumstances of an extremely grave character, and

  2. Caused the defendant to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged.

4. In considering "things said or done" for the purposes of section 55(4) "the fact that a thing done or said consisted sexual infidelity is to be disregarded", section 55(6)(c).

Case Summary

5. The appellant was convicted at the Crown Court in Reading for the murder of his wife. His evidence was that prior to the fatal attack his wife explained that she had sex with a number of men during a trial separation in their marriage. Judge Smith directed herself that this evidence was "things said or done constituting sexual infidelity" and therefore to be disregarded for the purposes the partial defence. There being no other 'triggers' for the loss of self-control the defence was not considered by the jury. The correctness of this decision formed the basis of the appeal.

6. Several problems faced the Court: (i) the definition of "sexual infidelity", (ii) how a "thing said" can itself "constitute" sexual infidelity and (iii) the extent of the prohibition where sexual infidelity is relevant context to other potential triggers. The Court of Appeal made reference to Hansard, however, the parliamentary debates were of scant guidance in the interpretation of this "formidably difficult provision".

7. The Court, faced with the fundamental problem that sexual infidelity is not defined in the statute or clarified in Parliamentary debate, itself avoided defining the term(s) while highlighting this latent difficulty [para.19]. The Court stopped short of adopting the submission of counsel that infidelity was the breach of mutual understanding that is to be inferred or expressly found within the relationship. Rather, the greatest elucidation of infidelity is that it "appears to involve a relationship between the two people to which one party may be unfaithful" [para.17]. As the relationship here was marriage the Court was not required to consider what types or 'seriousness' of relationship give rise to a duty of sexual fidelity and on what basis, subjective or objective, this belief in a duty of sexual fidelity is assessed.

8. As to 'sexual' the Court recognised that whereas it is straightforward for an act to be sexual, "things said" poses far greater difficulty. The Court drew on the example of the words "I love you" but in its discussion refrained from determining if this is "sexual" for the purposes of the 2009 Act. However, it is clear that words admitting or detailing sexual acts will be "sexual" things said. Therefore an individual admitting a sexual affair will have said a "sexual" thing whereas the position remains uncertain for an emotional affair (such as "I love another").

9. Notwithstanding the Court's avoidance of fully defining "sexual" or "infidelity" it held that admissions of a sexual affair in the context of marriage, or reports of such by third parties, were things said which "constituted" sexual infidelity. The truthfulness of these admissions or reports is irrelevant [para.26]. The difference between things said "constituting" sexual infidelity, such as admission and reports, and words falling short of 'constituting' such infidelity is the context, namely; the relationship of the parties, and the person by whom and to whom the circumstances in which the words are spoken [para.25].

10. The Court was alive to potential injustices resulting from the application of the exclusionary rule to unrealistically compartmentalise sexual infidelity so as to remove evidence before the jury that is integral to the facts as a whole. Therefore it is only where sexual infidelity is the "only potential trigger" that the evidence is to be disregarded. However, where sexual infidelity "is integral to and forms an essential part of the context" in which another trigger properly falls to be considered the exclusionary rule does not operate. The Court drew on the example of a wife returning to find her husband raping her sister. The sexual conduct constitutes sexual infidelity, excluded as a trigger, and rape, which is a separate potential trigger. The Court concluded that so long as the sexual infidelity is not the exclusive basis for the loss of control it is relevant context to the evaluation of other potential triggers.

11. Further, in considering whether a person in the circumstances of the defendant would have reacted in the same or a similar way (section 54(1)(c)) sexual infidelity will be a relevant circumstance [para.37].


12. Both "sexual" and "infidelity" are difficult terms requiring definition or exposition for the proper understanding of the statutory defence. The Court was not required to differentiate between sexual infidelity and what might be more properly considered as 'emotional infidelity' (the 'I love you' example) as this was not in issue. The definition of 'sexual' may be easier to address than 'infidelity' as criminal courts are well versed in dealing with sexual offences. Section 78 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 defines "sexual", for the purposes of that Act, applying an objective standard taking into account the nature, purposes and circumstances of the act. This definition is concerned with physical acts, namely "penetration, touching or any other activity", therefore its adoption would limit the scope of the exclusionary rule for loss of self-control.

13. This definition would accord with the Court's finding that an admission of an (physical) affair constitutes "sexual" infidelity. It would, however, result in the words "I love you" not being "sexual" given the words themselves do not relate to any activity that may be assessed as sexual or non-sexual. Applying this interpretation to the example used by the Court, a woman overhearing her partner say "I love you" to another woman (emotional infidelity) would have the defence available, however, actually finding her husband in flagrante (sexual infidelity) and killing without more would prima facie not be a relevant trigger to a loss of self-control.

14. It is perhaps a trite point that "sexual" infidelity is almost inexorably bound up with "emotional" infidelity (although the reverse need not necessarily be true). The Court recognised that the loss of self-control often stems not from the mere fact of sexual infidelity, rather 'the betrayal and heartbreak, and crushed dreams' it represents. Again, taking a narrow approach to 'sexual infidelity' it could reasonably be argued that finding a partner in flagrante was not the trigger, rather it was the fact of the betrayal, which would be analogous to the betrayal in the "I love another (but have not had any sexual relations with them)" example. As with the Court's example of the woman finding her husband raping her sister sexual conduct can constitute more than simply 'sexual infidelity'.

15. As soon as a notion of emotional infidelity arises, and it might be expected this would be common, then this is another potential trigger for which sexual infidelity, on the reasoning of Clinton may be relevant context. Indeed a literal reading of the provision, as suggested by Omerod, is that it is only the fact of the thing said or done constituting sexual infidelity, not the effect of such things said or done, which is to be disregarded. Therefore, the exclusionary provision could be restricted to all but a narrow seam of cases where the loss of self-control was solely a result of the act or things said constituting sexual infidelity, not the effects and emotional repercussion thereof.


16. The judgment in Clinton is an effort to make sense of problematic legislation. While practitioners will glean some guidance from Clinton the scope of "sexual infidelity" remains wholly unclear and is likely to require further attention by the Court of Appeal. One approach is to narrowly define 'sexual' and continue to allow 'sexual infidelity' to be considered as relevant context where another potential trigger is present; such an approach may welcomingly restrict the application of section 55(6)(c) within practicable bounds.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.