UK: After Enron - The Effect on UK Trading Agreements

Last Updated: 9 July 2002

Chris Towner of Herbert Smith’s Corporate Group examines some consequences of Enron’s collapse that have not so far received much publicity, namely the impact this has had on energy trading in the U.K. and in particular the lessons to be drawn with a view to revising provisions commonly contained in trading contracts.

Since Enron Corp filed for Chapter 11 proceedings on 2 December 2001 thousands of column inches have been written analysing the rise and fall of this energy trading behemoth. To set the context of this corporate collapse, three "facts" are worth recalling:

  • Enron was the largest ever corporate bankruptcy with assets of $63 billion;
  • Enron was ranked seventh in the Fortune 500 list of companies; and
  • Enron’s share price declined from over $80 a share to under $1 a share in a little over a year.

The effects of Enron’s demise on the accountancy profession, on the regulation of energy trading and even on political funding have been widely discussed. Fewer comments have been made though on the consequences for Enron’s core business activity: energy trading in the US and in the UK.

At the time of its collapse, Enron was the counterparty to approximately 25% of electricity and gas trades in the England and Wales market. By any standards this was a huge market position. Enron also owned and ran the largest on-line trading platform operating in this market. The fact that Enron Europe’s administration on 29 November 2001 did not cause greater disruption in these markets was due in the main to the scrambled unwinding of positions by counterparties in the days prior to 29 November. This window of opportunity itself only existed because the proposed Dynegy take-over of Enron Corp delayed the insolvency of that company by a vital few weeks. This breathing space allowed Enron’s counterparties to adjust their market positions to take account of the impending insolvency.

Now that the once unthinkable has occurred, the UK market has time to consider what lessons for trading contracts should be learnt from this insolvency. It should be remembered that Enron Direct Limited was only the second licensed supplier (following Independent Energy) operating in the UK electricity markets to become insolvent, since privatisation in 1989. The comments below directly relate to the Grid Trade Master Agreement ("GTMA") and the NBP ’99 terms ("NBP terms"). The same types of issues will arise in relation to EFET agreements, ZBT agreements or ISDA based contracts.

While the administration order granted in respect of Enron’s European subsidiaries, for example, would be an act of insolvency and a termination event under both the GTMA and the NBP terms, the practical experience of Enron counterparties was that they wished to be able to terminate contracts before this time. To avoid this position in the future, parties have begun to focus on other termination triggers, such as a material adverse change ("MAC") clause.

Enron themselves had been instrumental in adapting the standard form MAC clause in the GTMA. Enron would typically replace the standard form clause with a clause relating to the credit ratings of the parties. If the credit rating of the counterparty, or its credit support provider, fell below investment grade this was either an immediate MAC, or, alternatively the counterparty was given a brief grace period to arrange alternative credit support. In the second case, a failure to put in place the required credit support was an MAC. It is important to note here which level of credit rating the parties should select. Typically investment grade ratings were chosen, i.e. BBB- or above on Standard & Poor or Baa3 on Moody’s. However, the role of the credit rating agencies in Enron’s demise has provoked considerable comment. Many market participants thought the agencies were too slow to downgrade Enron Corp, because they were aware of the consequences such a step would have. It is one of the many ironies of Enron’s fall that it was the stricter credit regime that they helped construct which finally pulled them down. The rating agencies have since tightened their approach to "asset light" companies, which in itself has provoked a credit squeeze for some American trading companies.

In drafting this MAC provision, which credit ratings agency should be used is vital, as is also whether a cut below investment grade is required by all credit rating agencies quoted in the contract or only by one of those agencies. Particular attention should be paid to the length of the grace period within which any additional credit support could be put in place, and the level of support required.

A further problem faced by some Enron counterparties was that as at 29 November, the Enron party they had contracted with had not yet filed for Chapter 11 proceedings (and in some cases, neither had its credit support provider). In relation to contracts of this type counterparties were often left without an immediate termination right. In cases such as these, some parties could rely on fallback events of default set out in Netting Agreements with their Enron counterparty. It was possible through the use of a Netting Agreement to insert fallback events of default in relation to all contracts between the relevant counterparties. This could, for example, provide that if the relevant Enron parent company suffered an event of insolvency then all contracts between the parties to the Netting Agreement parties could be closed out, irrespective of whether any event of default under the individual contracts had taken place. The use of Netting Agreements increased in the final months of Enron’s decline, and they are becoming an increasingly common feature of trading relationships entered into since that time.

The question of parent company insolvency raised the issue of whether Chapter 11 proceedings in respect of an American parent of an English subsidiary constituted an act of insolvency under an agreement made under English law. While standard form wording relating to "analogous proceedings in other jurisdictions" may give sufficient comfort, it is advisable at the time the contract is entered into to consider where the relevant parent company is incorporated, and making it explicit that the appropriate insolvency events in that jurisdiction are listed in the contract itself as events of insolvency.

A further development arising from Enron’s insolvency relates to the relationship between counterparties and other companies in their group. There have been attempts by Enron to assign profitable transactions from insolvent Enron entities to solvent Enron entities. This leaves a counterparty with a debt to a solvent Enron entity and a claim against an insolvent Enron New partners within the energy group entity. While Enron’s ability to carry out this kind of procedure may be open to challenge, an easier way to address this difficulty is through the assignment provisions in the trading contracts themselves. Prior to Enron’s demise, it was common for assignment to affiliates to it to be possible without the counterparty’s consent. Following Enron’s collapse, companies are closing this potential loophole. There appear to be two options developing, first to have an outright prohibition on any assignment without consent. The second option is to state clearly that any consent is subject to existing netting rights under the trading contract itself. There is also a question as to whether a party may only assign all of its transactions under a GTMA, for example, or whether a party is able to cherry pick the contracts which they assign. Under the NBP terms the right to assign each Transaction (whether profitable or not) is clear.

Assignments of rights in breach of the terms of the contract would in itself be a material event of default. If that type of event is not cured in the relevant grace period, then a right to terminate the contract normally arises. The length of grace periods is another factor that has received attention since Enron’s insolvency. Grace periods had already been looked into in the American market in the light of the Californian experience with electricity supply, and in particular the insolvency of the power suppliers in that state. Those cases focussed on grace periods for non-payment, but similarly truncated timescales have been put in place in relation to material events of default. These can now be as short as two banking days.

One of the fundamental themes running through these changes is credit. It was the downgrade made by credit rating agencies that forced Enron companies to put up extra credit support that finally broke Enron. Since November several other traders have faced credit squeezes as ratings agencies and banks have become far more cautious in their approach to companies in this market. Calpine and Dynergy have sought extra credit lines to boost their liquidity. Aquila, on the other hand, reacted by purchasing physical assets from Cogentrix and immediately saw its stock price fall 30% owing to market fears regarding Aquila’s increased debt.

Credit and the terms of credit under trading contracts are fundamental to the continued operation of these markets. In these circumstances it is no surprise that the executive vice-president of Duke Energy is calling for standardised credit terms in US trading contracts. In the UK at least the market seems to be getting there itself.

© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.