UK: After Enron - The Effect on UK Trading Agreements

Last Updated: 9 July 2002

Chris Towner of Herbert Smith’s Corporate Group examines some consequences of Enron’s collapse that have not so far received much publicity, namely the impact this has had on energy trading in the U.K. and in particular the lessons to be drawn with a view to revising provisions commonly contained in trading contracts.

Since Enron Corp filed for Chapter 11 proceedings on 2 December 2001 thousands of column inches have been written analysing the rise and fall of this energy trading behemoth. To set the context of this corporate collapse, three "facts" are worth recalling:

  • Enron was the largest ever corporate bankruptcy with assets of $63 billion;
  • Enron was ranked seventh in the Fortune 500 list of companies; and
  • Enron’s share price declined from over $80 a share to under $1 a share in a little over a year.

The effects of Enron’s demise on the accountancy profession, on the regulation of energy trading and even on political funding have been widely discussed. Fewer comments have been made though on the consequences for Enron’s core business activity: energy trading in the US and in the UK.

At the time of its collapse, Enron was the counterparty to approximately 25% of electricity and gas trades in the England and Wales market. By any standards this was a huge market position. Enron also owned and ran the largest on-line trading platform operating in this market. The fact that Enron Europe’s administration on 29 November 2001 did not cause greater disruption in these markets was due in the main to the scrambled unwinding of positions by counterparties in the days prior to 29 November. This window of opportunity itself only existed because the proposed Dynegy take-over of Enron Corp delayed the insolvency of that company by a vital few weeks. This breathing space allowed Enron’s counterparties to adjust their market positions to take account of the impending insolvency.

Now that the once unthinkable has occurred, the UK market has time to consider what lessons for trading contracts should be learnt from this insolvency. It should be remembered that Enron Direct Limited was only the second licensed supplier (following Independent Energy) operating in the UK electricity markets to become insolvent, since privatisation in 1989. The comments below directly relate to the Grid Trade Master Agreement ("GTMA") and the NBP ’99 terms ("NBP terms"). The same types of issues will arise in relation to EFET agreements, ZBT agreements or ISDA based contracts.

While the administration order granted in respect of Enron’s European subsidiaries, for example, would be an act of insolvency and a termination event under both the GTMA and the NBP terms, the practical experience of Enron counterparties was that they wished to be able to terminate contracts before this time. To avoid this position in the future, parties have begun to focus on other termination triggers, such as a material adverse change ("MAC") clause.

Enron themselves had been instrumental in adapting the standard form MAC clause in the GTMA. Enron would typically replace the standard form clause with a clause relating to the credit ratings of the parties. If the credit rating of the counterparty, or its credit support provider, fell below investment grade this was either an immediate MAC, or, alternatively the counterparty was given a brief grace period to arrange alternative credit support. In the second case, a failure to put in place the required credit support was an MAC. It is important to note here which level of credit rating the parties should select. Typically investment grade ratings were chosen, i.e. BBB- or above on Standard & Poor or Baa3 on Moody’s. However, the role of the credit rating agencies in Enron’s demise has provoked considerable comment. Many market participants thought the agencies were too slow to downgrade Enron Corp, because they were aware of the consequences such a step would have. It is one of the many ironies of Enron’s fall that it was the stricter credit regime that they helped construct which finally pulled them down. The rating agencies have since tightened their approach to "asset light" companies, which in itself has provoked a credit squeeze for some American trading companies.

In drafting this MAC provision, which credit ratings agency should be used is vital, as is also whether a cut below investment grade is required by all credit rating agencies quoted in the contract or only by one of those agencies. Particular attention should be paid to the length of the grace period within which any additional credit support could be put in place, and the level of support required.

A further problem faced by some Enron counterparties was that as at 29 November, the Enron party they had contracted with had not yet filed for Chapter 11 proceedings (and in some cases, neither had its credit support provider). In relation to contracts of this type counterparties were often left without an immediate termination right. In cases such as these, some parties could rely on fallback events of default set out in Netting Agreements with their Enron counterparty. It was possible through the use of a Netting Agreement to insert fallback events of default in relation to all contracts between the relevant counterparties. This could, for example, provide that if the relevant Enron parent company suffered an event of insolvency then all contracts between the parties to the Netting Agreement parties could be closed out, irrespective of whether any event of default under the individual contracts had taken place. The use of Netting Agreements increased in the final months of Enron’s decline, and they are becoming an increasingly common feature of trading relationships entered into since that time.

The question of parent company insolvency raised the issue of whether Chapter 11 proceedings in respect of an American parent of an English subsidiary constituted an act of insolvency under an agreement made under English law. While standard form wording relating to "analogous proceedings in other jurisdictions" may give sufficient comfort, it is advisable at the time the contract is entered into to consider where the relevant parent company is incorporated, and making it explicit that the appropriate insolvency events in that jurisdiction are listed in the contract itself as events of insolvency.

A further development arising from Enron’s insolvency relates to the relationship between counterparties and other companies in their group. There have been attempts by Enron to assign profitable transactions from insolvent Enron entities to solvent Enron entities. This leaves a counterparty with a debt to a solvent Enron entity and a claim against an insolvent Enron New partners within the energy group entity. While Enron’s ability to carry out this kind of procedure may be open to challenge, an easier way to address this difficulty is through the assignment provisions in the trading contracts themselves. Prior to Enron’s demise, it was common for assignment to affiliates to it to be possible without the counterparty’s consent. Following Enron’s collapse, companies are closing this potential loophole. There appear to be two options developing, first to have an outright prohibition on any assignment without consent. The second option is to state clearly that any consent is subject to existing netting rights under the trading contract itself. There is also a question as to whether a party may only assign all of its transactions under a GTMA, for example, or whether a party is able to cherry pick the contracts which they assign. Under the NBP terms the right to assign each Transaction (whether profitable or not) is clear.

Assignments of rights in breach of the terms of the contract would in itself be a material event of default. If that type of event is not cured in the relevant grace period, then a right to terminate the contract normally arises. The length of grace periods is another factor that has received attention since Enron’s insolvency. Grace periods had already been looked into in the American market in the light of the Californian experience with electricity supply, and in particular the insolvency of the power suppliers in that state. Those cases focussed on grace periods for non-payment, but similarly truncated timescales have been put in place in relation to material events of default. These can now be as short as two banking days.

One of the fundamental themes running through these changes is credit. It was the downgrade made by credit rating agencies that forced Enron companies to put up extra credit support that finally broke Enron. Since November several other traders have faced credit squeezes as ratings agencies and banks have become far more cautious in their approach to companies in this market. Calpine and Dynergy have sought extra credit lines to boost their liquidity. Aquila, on the other hand, reacted by purchasing physical assets from Cogentrix and immediately saw its stock price fall 30% owing to market fears regarding Aquila’s increased debt.

Credit and the terms of credit under trading contracts are fundamental to the continued operation of these markets. In these circumstances it is no surprise that the executive vice-president of Duke Energy is calling for standardised credit terms in US trading contracts. In the UK at least the market seems to be getting there itself.

© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions