UK: Non-Executive Directors and Recent Developments

Last Updated: 9 July 2002
Article by Alex Firth

April saw the role of non-executive directors very much in the news. The National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) published guidelines on what institutional investors expect from non-executive directors, the outgoing President of the Institute of Directors made his opinions known and the Government announced there would be a review of the role of non-executive directors.

These came in the same month that the Equitable Life announced that it is to sue 15 of its former directors on the grounds that their alleged negligence caused many policyholders a "substantial loss of benefits". Equitable say the 15 served on the board in the summer of 2000 in the run-up to, and in some cases after, a legal challenge over guaranteed annuity rate pension policies, "GARs", which threatened the existence of the insurer. Equitable Life accused the former directors of failing to recognise there were potential problems on which advice should have been sought, and of failing to act appropriately on advice that it was possible that Equitable Life would lose a test case over its treatment of GAR policyholders. The directors are being sued for £3billion even though they are only collectively insured for £5million. They have responded through their solicitors to the points put to them by the challenge and refute any wrong doing but it is expected that the case will last several years and possibly end up in the House of Lords.

Also in April, Sir Roger Hurn stood down as chairman of Prudential because he did not want it to be tarnished by his involvement in the Marconi affair. Ruth Lea, head of policy at the Institute of Directors said that Sir Roger Hurn's case highlighted that all directors were responsible for corporate problems: "It does not matter whether you are non-executive or executive, you are equally accountable."

The month also saw the resignation of Lord Wakeham as head of the Press Complaints Commission as a result of his £80,000 a year non-executive directorship of Enron, the collapsed energy trading group.

The timely publication of guidance by the NAPF on non-executive directors has stated that their view is that a non-executive director should limit the number of positions he holds to 5 and that full-time executive directors should not take on more than one outside directorship. It also stated that pay for non-executive directors should be more closely linked to their experience, knowledge and time with the companies as it was generally perceived among investors that their fees were too low considering their level of seniority and expected expertise. The number of days spent by each non-executive director with the company should be reported in corporate accounts. Non-executive directors should have the option of being paid in shares or cash, however the NAPF was opposed to the issuing of share options because the "greater leverage" involved could compromise decision making. Clearly the direction of the NAPF guidelines is towards more involvement of the non-executives with the companies whose boards they are on and a consideration of their remuneration to compensate them for this extra commitment. There is obviously a fine line between greater involvement and not being independent enough though, the NAPF in June urged the shareholders of WPP to vote out two non-executive directors at the AGM because they had been with the company too long.

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has echoed the concerns of the NAPF and it, too, has called for an increase in pay in line with greater responsibilities and greater commitment and for non-executive directors to not hold "too many" similar roles. They have not indicated what too many would be however.

Lord Young used his last speech as President of the Institute of Directors in April to state that the role of the non-executive directors should be abolished. The reason being that non-executive directors can never fully supervise the actions of the directors due to time constraints and constraints in their knowledge of the company. To think that they can was "dangerous nonsense" he said. Lord Young suggested that there should only be one class of director and they should be full-time employees of the company, leaving outside scrutiny to shareholders. This is an extreme view and one unlikely to be pursued by government, who appear comfortable with the role of non-executive directors within the corporate governance regime, albeit with some amendments to their role, as the commissioning of an independent review indicates.

Many of the problems with non-executive directors are being highlighted by the first serious economic downturn occurring since the emergence of the corporate governance industry in the early 1990s. The culmination of the work of the Cadbury Committee in 1992, the Greenbury Review in 1995 and the Hampel Review in 1998 was the Combined Code which sets out best practice for companies and which companies should adhere to or explain in their annual reports why not. This has at its heart the role of non-executive directors.

They are supposed to act as checks and balances on the executive team, controlling chief executives, overseeing the audit and overseeing the setting of the pay of the executive directors. In addition their main function is to represent the interests of the shareholders, when their interests clash with those of the management. However their role has been exposed as being woefully inadequate and far short of the expectations the city had of them, none of them preventing the recent high profile collapses of Marconi and Enron and the recent trouble at Equitable Life.

The consultation

With all this activity as a background, the Chancellor Gordon Brown and Trade and Industry Secretary Patricia Hewitt announced on 15th April that there would be an independent review of Non-Executive Directors and appointed Derek Higgs to head the review.

The Department of Trade and Industry ("DTI") published a consultation document on the 7th of June on "The role and effectiveness of non-executive directors".

The Review is assessing: the population of non-executive directors in the UK, who they are, how they are appointed and how they can be drawn from a wider pool of talent; the independence and effectiveness of non-executives; the actual and potential relationship between non-executives and institutional investors; and what could be done to strengthen the quality, independence and effectiveness of UK non-executive directors. It aims to do this by raising the following issues for consultation:

Issues raised by the Consultation Paper

  • What role should non-executive directors perform, and how does this compare to the present position?

  • What knowledge, skills and attributes are needed, and what can be done to attract, recruit and appoint the best people to non-executive roles?

  • Do existing structures and procedures facilitate effective performance by non-executive directors?

  • Do existing relationships with shareholders or others need to be strengthened?

  • How can non-executive directors best be supported to perform their role?

And in relation to all of the above consideration is needed to be given to and views invited on the following aspects:

  • In what ways is the position different for smaller listed companies?

  • What can we learn from international experience?

Responses to the consultation are due by the 6th September, with the intention that Derek Higgs will report to the Chancellor and the Trade and Industry Secretary at the end of the year. In his introduction to the review, Mr Higgs points out that the Government’s preferred starting point is an approach based on best practice rather than regulation or legislation. They have not, however, ruled anything out. It will be interesting to see in which direction the roles of non-executive directors will go and how the government proposes to do this bearing in mind the Combined Code has not been as sturdy as it might have been in steering many companies through this troublesome period. The Government is currently considering the Company Law Review recommendations published in July 2001, which proposed that a general statement of directors’ duties should be set out in legislation. It may be that they combine the findings of the review with the recommendations of the CLR to provide legislative guidance for directors, particularly non-executive directors who at present do not even have the benefit of their position statutorily defined. It is certain that, judging by the mood in the city, the Government will not be able to move on from this consultation without some wide ranging changes to the role of non-executive directors.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions