UK: Restrictive Covenants: Recent Cases

Last Updated: 15 March 2012
Article by Charles Wynn-Evans and Emma Richardson

To be enforceable, restrictive covenants should go no further than is reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate business interests of the employer. To determine whether a covenant is acceptable the courts will consider the duration, scope and geographical limitations of the covenant. This DechertOnPoint considers some recent cases that deal with issues of enforceability and breach of restrictive covenants.

Towry EJ Limited v Barry Bennett and others (High Court, 2012): Proving Solicitation

The defendants were financial advisers and stockbrokers who were employed by Towry EJ Limited ("TEJ"). The defendants resigned or were dismissed for redundancy following the sale of TEJ and went to work for a competitor. A large number of clients followed the defendants to the competitor company. TEJ claimed that the defendants had breached their post-termination restrictions which prohibited them from soliciting clients for 12 months after the termination of their employment.

Three important points were decided by the Court:

  • It was not necessary for TEJ (whose advisory and investment services had been transferred out of its business) to have a continuing business interest at the time of the trial in order to be able to enforce the restrictive covenants. While this is relevant to determine whether or not the protection is reasonably necessary — that question is to be decided as at the date when the restrictive covenant was entered into.
  • Solicitation is not determined solely by whether the employee made the first contact but whether there is an element of persuasion in their communications with clients. Therefore a contractual non-solicitation clause of this kind means former employees "must not directly or indirectly request, persuade or encourage clients of their former employer to transfer their business to their new employer".
  • TEJ needed to demonstrate that the unprecedented loss of clients was due to solicitation by the defendants, however, TEJ had not managed to prove this. The Court found that TEJ had understated other relevant factors such as the trust and loyalty that the clients may have felt towards its former employees and the clients' dissatisfaction with their new advisers at TEJ. It was also relevant that the defendants' new employer had behaved impeccably and sought to ensure that the individuals would not breach their restrictive covenants.

Customer Systems plc v Ranson and others (High Court, 2011): Limiting the Scope of Non-compete Covenants

Customer Systems plc ("CS") provided specialist information technology consultancy through a group of companies. CS employed Mr. Ranson as a senior sales manager. He set up a competing company of his own while still employed by CS. A number of CS' employees left to join Mr. Ranson's new company.

The Court had to consider whether the employees had breached their restrictive covenants which prevented them from undertaking direct or indirect employment with any of CS's present or past customers with whom they had been personally involved whilst working for CS.

The Court decided that the covenant was unreasonable and unenforceable. This was because:

  • there was no time limit on the interval between the employee's involvement with the customer and the employee leaving CS — also, the employee's level of involvement may have only been slight; and
  • the covenants were not restricted to employment in the same field in which CS operated and therefore applied to any kind of employment which an employee could take up with a customer or former customer.

Monster Vision UK Ltd v McKie (High Court, 2011): Legitimate Business Interests

Monster Vision UK Ltd ("MV"), a company that provides interactive advertising solutions, was seeking the continuation of an injunction against Mr. McKie which restrained him from acting in breach of his restrictive covenants. Mr. McKie had been the sales director of MV and was subject to restrictive covenants prohibiting him from competing with MV, soliciting any of MV's customers or employing any of MV's employees for a period of two years. The non-compete covenant was limited geographically to the countries in the world in which MV or any of its affiliates had or reasonably planned (as at the termination of Mr. McKie's employment) to conduct business.

The Court held that, although the two year period for the non-competition covenant was arguably reasonable, it was nonetheless unenforceable because:

  • its scope restricted any competition by Mr. McKie and so went beyond what was necessary for the protection of MV's legitimate business interests;
  • its application to affiliates was unreasonable;
  • its application to any country in which the company or its affiliates had plans to have business was too vague; and
  • a non-solicitation clause would have been adequate and possible to police.

The Court also held that the non-employment covenant was unenforceable because it went beyond merely restraining Mr. McKie from soliciting or actively poaching MV's employees.

Landmark Brickwork Ltd v Sutcliffe and others (High Court, 2011): Certainty of Covenants

Mr. Sutcliffe had been Landmark Brickwork Ltd's ("LB") managing director but had been summarily dismissed by LB on the grounds that he had started to establish a rival business. LB was seeking to obtain an injunction (based on the contractual restrictive covenants) for six months preventing Mr. Sutcliffe from competing with LB or soliciting or dealing with any customer or supplier of LB.

The Court held that:

  • restraints must be certain in scope to be enforceable. In this case, the application of the non-compete covenant to an area described as "to the south" of certain identified counties and in respect of "any other place" in which LB operated were inherently uncertain and as such unenforceable; and
  • a restriction on Mr. Sutcliffe accepting unsolicited business was unreasonable because in such circumstances there was no risk that Mr. Sutcliffe would exploit either his customer connections or LB's confidential information.

The Court did grant interim injunctions prohibiting Mr. Sutcliffe from soliciting and dealing with LB's customers but held that the enforceability of those covenants was a serious issue to be considered at the full trial. This was because the restrictions extended to customers with whom Mr. Sutcliffe had no personal dealings and may therefore have gone further than necessary to protect LB's business interests. The issue was not determined at the injunction hearing but the Court commented that Mr. Sutcliffe's position as managing director may have led him to possess confidential information in relation to, and gain influence over, customers he had not personally dealt with (in other words, the absence of Mr. Sutcliffe's personal dealings with clients may not have rendered the covenant unenforceable).

Tim Russ & Co v Robertson and others (High Court, 2011): Legitimate Business Interests

Mr. Robertson was an employee of Tim Russ & Co ("TR") which operated an estate agency in Haslemere. Robertson resigned from his employment and set up a rival estate agency approximately 1.5 miles from TR's Haslemere office. TR sought to enforce Mr. Robertson's non-compete covenant which prohibited him from setting up a competing business within five miles of the Haslemere office for 12 months.

The Court held that:

  • the covenant's geographical scope was not the only factor to take into consideration;
  • TR had to demonstrate a legitimate business interest and since that interest was customer connections TR would need to have recurring customers;
  • since Mr. Robertson had not, while employed by TR, dealt with its recurring customers, TR could not demonstrate that the covenant was necessary to protect its customer connections; and
  • even if there had been a customer connection properly protectable in relation to Mr. Robertson, 12 months was an excessive period of protection.

Lonmar Global Risks Limited v West, Mee, Karpus, Tyser & Co Limited (High Court, 2010): Duration of Solicitation/Dealing Covenants

Lonmar Global Risks Limited ("LGR") was a Lloyd's insurance and reinsurance broker and Tyser & Co Limited (the fourth defendant) was a direct competitor. The first three defendants were summarily dismissed by LGR on the grounds that they were soliciting clients and other employees and taking steps to move work and employees to Tyser. One issue for the Court was whether the post-termination restrictions imposed upon Mr. West and Mr. Mee were unenforceable for being too wide.

The Court held that:

  • an employer has a legitimate interest in protecting its relationships with clients introduced or brought over to it by an employee; and
  • the 12 month duration of the restrictions against the employees soliciting and dealing with clients was reasonable as clients renewed contracts with LGR on an annual basis. Accordingly, any shorter period would not allow LGR to adequately protect its legitimate interests.

Associated Foreign Exchange Ltd v International Foreign Exchange (UK) Ltd and another (High Court, 2010): Customer Connections

The claimant company was seeking an interim injunction to prevent a former employee (who had bought and sold currency from existing clients and pursued new clients) from breaching certain restrictive covenants after he commenced employment with a competitor (the first defendant). The individual was prohibited from soliciting business from customers or potential customers for 12 months and from dealing with any customers or potential customers for six months following the termination of his employment.

The Court held that:

  • The claimant company did have a legitimate business interest to protect because a recently departed employee would have knowledge of the most profitable clients and potentially have had recent dealings or communications with customers so that their influence with the customers may be significant.
  • The non-solicitation covenant was not enforceable because it went beyond what was reasonable considering that the former employee had not held a senior position and it had not been established that there was likely to be an adverse effect on the employer's client connections after any significant break (such as six months).
  • Had it found to the contrary regarding the duration of the restraint, it was unlikely that it would have been either reasonable or necessary to extend the protection beyond customers to potential customers.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.