UK: Public Bodies Act Orders: The Bonfire Is Lit

Last Updated: 28 February 2012
Article by Paul Thompson

This blog has been quiet for a while and will shortly be terminating. In the spirit of the Public Bodies Act and having regard to "efficiency, effectiveness and economy" (see section 8 of the Act), it seems right to contemplate its abolition. However, as draft orders are rolled out under the Act, a process which has now begun and many more draft orders can be expected shortly, I and colleagues here will be continuing to take a close interest in the subject for anyone who cares to instruct us.

So what is the present position? In a nutshell:

  • the Act reached the statute book on 14 December 2011 (see here);
  • the Commons has decided that, ordinarily the departmental select committee or, in the case of Cabinet Office proposals, the Public Administration Select Committee should have the scrutiny role in the Commons (see here);
  • the Lords has made provision for the Merits Committee in that House to be its scrutiny committee (see here);
  • the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments will exercise its usual function of checking the drafting and technical issues on the draft orders;
  • two Public Bodies Orders have now been laid, one for the abolition of the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA) (see here) and the other for the abolition of the Courts Boards (see here). Both have been subject to reports form the Merits Committee (see here and here) and are proceeding on the affirmative resolution procedure;
  • quite a number have been promised very shortly, including that for the British Waterways Board and its replacement by the new Canals and Rivers Trust;
  • various statutory consultations required before an Order be laid have now been completed and some, including those for the Railway Heritage Committee (1 March), British Shipbuilders (26 April) and S4C (4 May) have yet to conclude.

Whilst the scrutiny process for draft orders in the Commons seems still to be a little inchoate, the position in the Lords is much clearer, the Merits Committee having made clear (see here its 50th Report for the current session and its reports on NESTA and the Courts Boards Orders) that it will aim to get out an initial report within 15 days of an order being laid, setting out its recommendation, if it makes one, for the adoption of enhanced affirmative procedure. In doing so, it will look at the s.8 statutory tests, whether the statutory consultation requirements have been met and at various other matters such as the effectiveness of the consultations and the implications of points made during the debates on the Public Bodies Bill. In what appears as something of a criticism of the MoJ on the draft Courts Boards Order, it has also made clear that it will expect the Government to present a properly argued case that the tests in the 2011 Act have been satisfied, supported by objective evidence. What though will happen if it finds that this is not done?

That brings us neatly to the general question of whether the Act makes adequate provision for Parliamentary scrutiny and involvement and whether Parliament is going to rise to the challenges which this presents. As I indicated at a seminar which we gave today, jointly with the Hansard Society on the subject of "Orders which change Acts", this gives rise to some difficult questions. On the one hand, whilst much was made during the course of the bill for the 2011 Act about the horrors of Henry VIII powers, it has to be conceded that Parliament's record in scrutinising and vetting public bills is in some respects far from wonderful and the treatment of secondary legislation needs to be seen in this context . Take for example the case of Public Bill Committees that are strictly controlled by the Whips to avoid real examination and debate of contentious provisions and then those cases where whole sets of provisions are parachuted into bills by the Government at the last moment, often in the second House. In contrast, on looking at the consideration given to bodies affected by the Public Bodies Act during the Bill's passage, now to be followed by enhanced affirmative procedure in many cases, it can be argued that they are getting pretty full and fair treatment. On the other hand, there are issues with delegated legislation and particularly the process under the Act which suggest that the Executive has been given too much control over the legislative process, which are likely to present problems and which can be seen as a wasted opportunity for Parliament in its very necessary function of scrutinising and maintaining a check on the Executive. For example:

  • unlike Legislative Reform Orders, there is no power of veto during the process (something which the Government very firmly resisted);
  • as with statutory instruments generally, Parliament has been given no power to amend;
  • there are huge time constraints - the 30, 40 and 60 day periods for affirmative and enhanced affirmative procedure include non-working days (other than when the Houses are not sitting for more than 4 days) and allow almost no time for reflection;
  • Parliamentary Committees, particularly the departmental select committees, already have very significant workloads and it may be wondered whether those with a a lot of orders to consider (eg the Efra and Justice Committees) will be able to cope;
  • in the Commons, the problem of overlapping committee remits means that some committees will have to play second fiddle to others, unless the Liaison Committee in some way intervenes;
  • stakeholder interests may have to chose between Lords and Commons scrutiny committees in making their submissions or be in both places at once;
  • there is in some respects a lack of complete transparency in the process eg in so far as informal dialogue will take place in advance of the laying of orders and appears to be encouraged between departments and committees which will be out of the public view (this is likely to include the submission of draft orders in advance of laying); also, transfer schemes don't have to be lodged with draft orders, though one was informally with the NESTA Order (see here).

Whilst I may be in a minority, it seems to me that Parliament really ought to have been given an opportunity to amend Public Bodies Orders presented to it, even if (as happens eg with special procedure orders), government retains a right to override the result then reached. It may well be that, with good work from the scrutiny committees, Ministers will exercise judgement in all appropriate cases to withdraw drafts and submit replacements with material modifications where these are truly merited (as the enhanced affirmative procedure allows) but, then again, this may be wishful thinking. Either House has of course the ultimate remedy of failing to approve the necessary affirmative resolution at the end of the process. As the Companion to the House of Lords Standing Orders makes clear, and this reflects the position taken in the Conventions Committee Report of 2005 and an exchange of letters with Lord Strathclyde in 2010, the Lords does retain "an unfettered freedom to vote on any subordinate legislation submitted for its consideration" (see here). Maybe we will see it doing so more frequently in the future.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.