UK: Human Rights Act Defence & Independent & Impartial Tribunal

Last Updated: 10 May 2002
Article by Andrew Lidbetter


In R(Bono) v Harlow District Council [2002] EWHC 423 (Admin)(15th March 2002), Richards J had to consider two important issues concerning the effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 – the requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and the defence to what would otherwise be an unlawful act by a public authority under section 6 of the Human Rights Act.

The claimants applied for housing benefit but the benefit was refused by the defendant Council which was not satisfied with the claimants' evidence of income. The claimants succeeded in a procedural challenge before a Review Board under the Housing Benefit (General) Regulations 1987 (made under the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992) but a newly-constituted Review Board upheld the original decision. Regulation 81 and schedule 7 provided that the Review Board was to be comprised of Councillors of the authority.

The claimants sought judicial review of the Review Board’s decision. They submitted that there had been a breach of their rights under Article 6 of the Convention since under the Regulations the Board was constituted of councillors of the defendant and was therefore not independent and impartial. It was also submitted that the Board had incorrectly applied the Regulations because they had omitted to consider the claimants’ attempts to submit a notebook detailing their income.

Article 6 of the Convention

The defendant Council argued that the availability of judicial review provided sufficient control to remedy any lack of independence or impartiality by the Council itself and hence the system complied with Article 6. Richards J referred to R(Bewry) v Norwich City Council [2001] EWHC Admin 657, where Moses J held that “This court cannot cure the often imperceptible effects of the influence of the connection between the fact finding body and a party to the dispute since it has no jurisdiction to reach its own conclusion on the primary facts; still less any power to weigh the evidence…The level of review this court can exercise does not replenish the want of independence on the Review Board, caused by its connection to a party to a dispute” (paras 64 and 65). Richards J held that since the question whether the Board was in breach of Article 6 of the Convention involved the determination of issues of primary fact, judicial review could not provide sufficient control to remedy that deficiency.

Richards J felt that in view of the substance of his decision it was felt unnecessary to consider the recent decision in Tower Hamlets LBC v Begum [2002] EWCA Civ 239, in which the Court of Appeal suggested circumstances where judicial review is sufficient to secure compliance with Article 6.

The Defence in Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998

Section 6 of the 1998 Act provides that it is unlawful for a public authority to act incompatibly with a Convention right (here the right to an independent and impartial tribunal in Article 6 of the Convention). However, subsection (2) states that the foregoing does not apply to an act which, as the result of primary legislation, means the authority could not act differently (section 6(2)(a)); or, in the case of provisions made under primary legislation which cannot be read or given effect in a way which is compatible with the Convention rights, the authority acted only so as to give effect to those provisions (section 6(2)(b)). The defendant Council sought to rely on section 6(2)(b) in the light of the 1987 Regulations.

Richards J held that a defence was available only if the local authority could show that it was constrained by primary incompatible legislation (here the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992) to constitute the Review Board as it had. Section 6(2)(b) did not protect in relation to subordinate legislation that was incompatible but not inevitably incompatible. Since section 63(3) of the 1992 Act was in very general terms and did not require the Regulations to provide for the constitution of a Board lacking in the attributes of independence and impartiality, section 6(2)(b) could not provide a defence to the council. In the Judge’s view “Where enabling primary legislation can be interpreted compatibly with Convention rights, incompatible subordinate legislation made under it cannot provide a lawful justification for acts incompatible with Convention rights” (para 33).

Richards J added that the intention of the 1998 Act was to preserve the invalidity of incompatible primary legislation and of inevitably incompatible subordinate legislation, but not to preserve the validity of incompatible subordinate legislation where the incompatibility was avoidable.

Misapplication of the Regulations

In the instant case the court had the ability to exercise sufficient judicial control to remedy the lack of independence and impartiality of the Review Board. This was because the Review Board failed properly to consider evidence before it (the notebook), and to consider the discretionary element of the Regulations. That omission meant that the Board had failed to take into account a material consideration and thus misapplied the Regulations. For that reason the Board's decision had to be quashed and overall compliance with Article 6 was achieved, since the breach could be cured.

Practical application

Bono raises two practical issues for a defendant public authority. First, it continues the debate as to when judicial review is an adequate way of complying with Article 6 of the Convention. Although some of the cases are hard to reconcile and it appears that a slightly different line is being taken in different contexts, the distinction appears to be between cases where the reviewing court is being asked to look at a public authority’s exercise of judgment where judicial review is an adequate control to remedy any lack of independence and impartiality at the administrative level and cases concerning an allegation that the authority has made an error in respect of primary facts where judicial review, because of its limited nature, is not an adequate control.

Secondly, Bono considers the position of an authority where secondary legislation requires it to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right. If the primary legislation is drafted widely such that the secondary legislation need not have been drafted in such a way as to lead to acts which are incompatible, authorities have a difficulty. On the one hand they must follow secondary legislation which applies to them. On the other they must not breach Convention rights. As Richards J noted in Bono there are conceptual difficulties in relation to whether the Council would have been able to appoint a Review Board other than in accordance with the Regulations to secure compliance with Article 6 and the Council’s scope for acting outside the Regulations was `not obvious’. The dilemma between following incompatible secondary legislation and complying with Convention rights has yet to be resolved and any authority placed in this situation will need to take great care when deciding how to proceed.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.