ARTICLE
9 November 2011

Rectification Of A Will Based On A Clerical Error

WB
Wedlake Bell

Contributor

We are a contemporary London law firm, rooted in tradition with a lasting legacy of client service. Founded in 1780, we recognise the long-standing relationships we have with our clients and how they have helped shape our past and provide a platform for our future. With 76 partners supported by over 300 lawyers and support staff, we operate on a four practice group model: private client, business services, real estate and dispute resolution. Our driving force is to empower our clients by providing quality legal advice, insight and intelligence that enables them to achieve their goals whether personal or business. We are large enough to advise on the most complex matters, but small enough to ensure that our people and our work remain exceptional and dynamic. Building relationships is at the heart of everything we do.
Wedlake Bell has recently successfully acted for the claimant in a reported case in the High Court for the rectification of a Will (Austin v Woodward and another [2011] EWHC 2458 (Ch)).
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Wedlake Bell has recently successfully acted for the claimant in a reported case in the High Court for the rectification of a Will (Austin v Woodward and another [2011] EWHC 2458 (Ch)).

The facts were that the testatrix, Mrs A, had instructed her solicitors to prepare an updated Will for her to execute in 2003. In drafting that Will, the solicitor had mistakenly included words from the firm's precedent which meant that the final Will did not reflect Mrs A's wishes. As a consequence of the mistake, Mrs A's daughter did not inherit the family home outright, which had been what Mrs A had clearly intended. Mrs A's daughter instructed Wedlake Bell to bring an application on her behalf for the rectification of the Will.

The High Court held that this was clearly a clerical error on the part of the solicitor drafting the Will and that the Will could therefore be rectified under section 20(1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1982. The gift of the house to Mrs A's daughter was given effect, as Mrs A had originally intended.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More