UK: House Of Lords Demands Change To Localism Bill In Second Reading Debate

Last Updated: 13 June 2011
Article by Angus Walker

This is entry number 248, published on 8 June 2011, of a blog on the Planning Act 2008 infrastructure planning and authorisation regime. Click here for a link to the whole blog. If you would like to be notified when the blog is updated, with links sent by email, click here.

Today's entry reports on the second reading of the Localism Bill in the House of Lords.

Yesterday, the Localism Bill received its second reading in the House of Lords (a debate on the general principles of the Bill).  The debate lasted for nearly seven hours and 51 peers spoke. Although a link to the Hansard report of the debate can be found here, here are some of the points that were made, reordered by subject-matter rather than chronologically for ease of reading.

In a nutshell, the main issues of contention were:

  • the protection of community assets,
  • neighbourhood planning,
  • the creation of shadow mayors before elections are held,
  • the declaration that financial incentives can affect the grant of planning permission,
  • sustainable development and the replacement of regional planning with a duty to co-operate,
  • the 5% referendum threshold,
  • the passing on of EU fines to local authorities, and
  • the community right to challenge the provision of local authority services

So many peers declared interests that one Baroness declared that she unusually did not have an interest. 

General principles

Lord Beecham for Labour said that with all the local democracy in the Bill, Eric Pickles was like the Athenian Pericles, who nearly had the same name.  He said it was ironic that clause 28 of the Bill repealed the duty to promote democracy.  Lord Shipley said that the Bill had not been drafted in a spirit of localism. Lord True said that the Bill should be permissive, not prescriptive. 

Lord Patel said that the 'people power' parts of the Bill could be accused of replacing highly developed and expert services with an underdeveloped and poorly resourced altarnative. Lord Adebowale noted that communities often knew what they wanted but were denied the resources to bring this about.

The Bishop of Derby said that the Bill's powers would be used by the wealthy and articulate and not by the disadvantaged. 

Some, often with local authority backgrounds, said that localism already existed, but needed proper funding to be realised rather than legislation.  Baroness Bakewell (i.e. Joan Bakewell) said that in Camden they had managed to prevent library cuts and scare off Starbucks with local action that did not require a Localism Bill.

Baroness Hamwee said that the Government need to get away from the idea that people needed protecting from their local authority.

Protection of community assets

Somewhat unexpectedly, the provisions about protecting community assets probably came in for the most widespread criticism, and this may reflect a campaign by the Country Land and Business Association.  This is the provision in the Bill where a community group interested in protecting a community asset (such as a village pub or post office) can be given a chance to put a bid together to buy it.  In opening, Baroness Hanham for the government referred to this correctly as the 'right to bid to buy' but in closing called it the 'right to buy', an incorrect shorthand often used.

Baroness Scott noted that the six clauses in the Bill on assets of community value required 54 sets of regulations to be issued by the government - a civil service job creation scheme.

Earl Cathcart wondered if farmers offering their fields to play cricket might withdraw that privilege if there was a danger of the field being declared an asset of community value.  He said that the intention of the Bill might thwart the sale of a pub to a different brewery with no change of use contemplated, and it was the change of use that was the important point, not sale.

Neighbourhood planning

The phrase of the day was 'double devolution' i.e. devolving power not one but two levels down.

Lord Ouseley said that the neighbourhood planning proposals would lead to greater complexity, increased bureaucracy and risks to community cohesion. 

Baroness Hanham noted that neighbourhood plans would have to be consistent with the 'national planning policy framework' (NPPF) - of which a suggested draft was published a few days ago - and the local plan.  In my view, this issue of consistency is going to be the making or breaking of neighbourhood planning. 

The Bishop of Norwich noted that only 35% of the population live in parishd areas - the remainder will be able to create ad hoc neighbourhood forums of 21 people or more.  He warned that 'more localism may not mean more harmony and unity in society'.

Lord Wei gave a very pro-Bill speech in which he said that neighbourhood planning was the alternative to an expensive and adversarial process where every little change needed to be argued over.  Hmm, OK.

Lord Cameron thought that bad developments might gravitate towards communities that did not have the capacity to do their own neighbourhood planning.  Viscount Simon said that neighbourhood planning should be concerned with land use planning and not purely economic goals. 

Lord Lucas suggested informal neighbourhood plans as an intermediate step.

Baroness Valentine did not like the idea of the community infrastructure levy being passed directly to neighbourhood groups. 

Shadow mayors

Lord Beecham equated the concept of shadow mayors - give them powers now, vote for them later - with the Anschluss, and he also questioned the conflation of political and executive roles in the office of mayor. 

Financial incentives as material consideration

In opening, Baroness Hanham slightly watered down the controversial clause added to the Bill in the Commons where financial incentives can be a material consideration when considering planning applications by saying 'but they don't have to be'.

Baroness Parminter thought that stating that finance could be a material consideration in statute would elevate it above all other material considerations. 

Viscount Simon quoted the CPRE's disquiet that financial incentives can affect planning decisions, which is ironic since it was the CPRE's advice that led to the clause (albeit not their intention).

Loss of regional planning and duty to co-operate

Baroness Andrews said that the Bill lost the spatial view of planning that allowed competing interests to be balanced.  She said that the duty to co-operate should not be optional.  She called for the government's version of the NPPF to be published and said that the practitioners' version of 'sustainability' erred on the side of economic growth.

Lord Cameron said that the duty to co-operate was a 'wing and a prayer'.  Baroness Young said that it was a bit woolly and was not enforced.  Baroness Parminter also wondered how it would be enforced and called for a duty to plan jointly.

Lord Marlesford warned against replacing PPGs and PPSs with the NPPF.  Lord Redesdale said that the House needed the government's definition of sustainable development before considering the Bill in detail.

Lord McKenzie said that the 'duty' to co-operate was essentially voluntary and fell short of an effective strategic approach to planning and also called for a definition of sustainable development. 


Earl Cathcart thought that the referendum bar was too low at 5% of the electorate.  I hadn't appreciated that a referendum could be held following a petition by 5% of the electors of a single ward.

Infrastructure planning

Little was said about infrastructure planning.  Lord Cameron said that the abolition of the IPC was a retrograde step, but Lords Jenkin and Marlesford were glad it was being abolished.  

Lord Berkeley asked where the National Policy Statements were.  He wondered whether a local referendum could have the effect of killing a national infrastructure project in the area and that such projects should be excluded from the scope of referendums (the Lords seem to prefer 'referenda'). 

EU fines

Lord Teverson and others were concerned about EU fines provisions, although the debate ranged between unfairly penalising local authorities without sufficient redress, to the whole issue being pointless since the UK had never been fined.

Community right to challenge

Baroness Whitaker did not want religious groups to be able to take over council services and yet be exempt from parts of the Equality Act, but Lord Mawson argued for churches taking over local services.

Baroness Thornton said that Eric Pickles was settling old scores from his Bradford days using the Bill.  She said that the community right to challenge may accelerate access to the private sector.

Lord True said that local authorities should be able to challenge provision of public services by others, e.g. social landlords.

Next steps

The Bill starts its committee stage on 20 June.  Note that in the House of Lords committees are always 'committees of the whole House', i.e. every peer is able to contribute.  Given what their Lordships had to say, we can expect a considerable number of amendments.

Previous entry 247: IPC issues advice to public bodies and promises more
Next entry 249: 12 hearings announced as IPC to allow cross-examination

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Angus Walker
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.