UK: Throttling Net Neutrality?

Last Updated: 20 May 2011
Article by Ivor Drake

Introduction

With expected further dramatic increases in data traffic due to the growth of IPTV and 4G mobile services and the emergence of traffic management technologies such as 'deep packet inspection' which has increased the ability of network operators to prioritise certain types of traffic, the debate concerning net neutrality is becoming even more prominent.

Net neutrality is a term used to refer to the treatment by ISPs of different forms of data being transmitted via the 'pipes' that make up their networks. The net neutrality debate is often polarised between:

  • Those who believe that internet applications, content, content providers and users should be treated equally by ISPs with no discrimination against any application or content through prioritisation of traffic or by blocking particular traffic – in the words of Barack Obama -"We can't have a situation in which the corporate duopoly [of cable and telephone companies] dictates the future of the Internet and that's why I'm supporting what is called net neutrality."1; and
  • Those who believe that network operators must reasonably be able to control access and use of the pipes over which data is transmitted potentially using different pricing structures for different types of users/data.

The announcement of the forthcoming BT Content Connect service earlier this year, which will be a content distribution network enabling video traffic to be stored closer to the user, thereby reducing congestion on the network and allowing for faster download speeds, shows that network providers are already implementing tiered service provision offerings. BT intends to offer the Content Connect service in basic, standard, premium and custom tiered packages.

UK view on net neutrality

In March 2011, the Broadband Stakeholder's Group2 published a voluntary industry code of practice on traffic-management transparency for broadband services3 and BSkyB, BT, O2, TalkTalk, Three, Virgin Media and Vodafone have signed up to the code.

The code commits signatories to:

  • provide further information to consumers about what traffic management takes place, for what purpose and with what impact;
  • comply with a set of good practice principles on providing information to consumers which is "understandable, appropriate, accessible, current, comparable and verifiable";
  • publish a common Key Facts Indicator (KFI) table, summarising the traffic management practices for each broadband product, to be available on ISPs' websites by the end of June 2011; and
  • allow comparison websites to compile traffic management practices across a range of broadband products.

Ofcom has been keen to monitor developments and keep the position under review based on its view that if a situation arose where it needed to take action it could do so under existing rules. Ofcom has emphasised the importance of competition between ISPs to ensure that issues around net neutrality do not arise. This is because if an ISP blocks a certain kind of traffic on its network it is believed by Ofcom that a UK consumer can switch ISP relatively easily given the number, and overlap of coverage, of ISPs in the UK. However, arguably the bundling of broadband with telephone, mobile or TV increases the consumer's difficulty in switching ISPs and reduces the scope of competition in the broadband sector.

On 24 June 2010, Ofcom issued a consultation on net neutrality and traffic management which closed for responses on 9 September 20104. Ofcom's preliminary view, as set out in the consultation, was that:

  • there is currently insufficient evidence to justify regulation to prohibit certain forms of traffic management;
  • cmore needs to be done regarding consumer transparency around traffic management; and
  • charging both consumers and content providers for guaranteed quality of service might potentially benefit consumers.

Ofcom's more relaxed approach to regulating the internet in the UK is in contrast to the actions of the EU legislative bodies who are keen to impose some uniform minimum requirements for the regulation of the internet across member states.

However, the publication of the traffic management transparency code by the ISPs suggests that they wish to stave off any further legislation in this area through self-regulation using such a code or at least become compliant with such legislation in advance. The code will be piloted in 2011, and its implementation will be reviewed in early 2012.

European view on net neutrality

The revised Framework Directive5 amended in November 20096 introduced new rules enabling national regulatory authorities ("NRAs" such as Ofcom) to set minimum quality levels for network transmission services to limit discrimination by ISPs between the types and sources of data travelling across their networks (all such regulations to be transposed into UK law by May 2011):

  • Article 8(4)(g) of the revised Framework Directive requires NRAs to promote the interests of the citizens of the EU by promoting the ability of end users to access and distribute information or run applications of their choice;
  • Articles 20 and 21 of the revised Universal Service Directive7 contain measures in relation to the transparency of information provided by service providers. In particular, contracts with consumers must provide information on any conditions limiting access to or use of services and applications. Service providers must also provide information on minimum service quality levels and on traffic management measures; and
  • Article 22(3) of the Universal Service Directive provides that member states must ensure that NRAs are able to set minimum quality of service requirements on service providers.

On 09 November 2010, the European Commission published a report on its consultation concerning net neutrality showing that:

  • the EU Telecoms Reform package8 is thought to be sufficient to provide the necessary legislative tools to deal with net neutrality issues, although the effectiveness of such rules should be assessed when the reforms have been implemented at a national level which must take place by May 2011;
  • there was a consistent view that traffic management is fundamental in order to operate a secure and efficient network, although some respondents were unsure as to whether traffic management could be abused to favour one service over another and what the privacy risks were in relation to the use of 'deep packet-inspection';/li>
  • the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications ("BEREC"), created by the EU Telecoms Reform package in 2010 and replacing the European Regulators Group for electronic communications networks and services, suggested that the use of traffic management may lead to anti-competitive effects, reduced innovation and freedom of expression over the internet and uncertainties for consumers due to lack of transparency between service providers; and
  • some content providers are concerned that changes to pricing mechanisms (e.g. payments for content delivery only) might amount to a tax on content innovation.

The European Commission recently published a Communication on the open internet and net neutrality9 concluding that it is committed to maintain an open internet and ensuring the "maintenance of a robust best-efforts internet to which everyone has access". The European Commission believes that the introduction of the EU Telecoms Reform package is likely to provide a competitive landscape that will uphold principles of net neutrality, however, as Member States are still implementing such legislation it remains to be seen how effective those measures will be in practice.

The European Commission and BEREC will continue to review a number of issues (such as, barriers to blocking, throttling, traffic management, transparency and quality-of-service) that arose during the consultation and the European Commission reserves its right to assess any behaviour related to traffic management that may restrict or distort competition under EU competition law. The evidence resulting from BEREC's investigations will be published later in 2011 and will include any instances of blocking or throttling certain types of traffic. If "significant and persistent" problems are discovered, the European Commission will assess the need for more stringent measures, in the form of guidance or legislation, to achieve competition and consumer choice. Such measures may involve facilitating consumer switching, imposing specific obligations regarding unjustified traffic-differentiation applicable to all ISPs irrespective of market power, or prohibiting the blocking of lawful services.

US view on net neutrality

Traditionally the US debate on net neutrality has had a higher profile than in the EU or UK due, in part, to the US having only a few large ISPs which inhibits the customer's ability to change ISP if they don't like the price of the services or the traffic management policy of the provider.

Google and Verizon have joined forces to present their vision10 of an "open internet", intended as a framework for future regulation of US internet services. This 'vision' listed a set of seven proposals11 that guarantee equal access to the internet and prohibit wired broadband providers from discriminating between different kinds of internet traffic to ensure that no-one can pay to have their traffic treated more favourably. However, they do suggest that there might be loopholes for mobile traffic and for some specialised content allowing internet providers to give priority to certain online traffic12 . The two firms also propose enforceable transparency rules and the power for the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to impose "a penalty of up to $2m on bad actors" i.e. those who commit net neutrality transgressions.

In December 2010 the FCC agreed to adopt the following rules relating to net neutrality13 (although the decision to do so was split along party lines with the Democrats voting for and the Republican's voting against these rules):

1. Fixed and mobile broadband providers must disclose their network management practices, performance characteristics and terms and conditions of their broadband services;

2. Fixed broadband providers may not block lawful content, applications, services or non-harmful devices; mobile broadband providers may not block lawful websites or block applications that compete with their voice or video telephony services; and

3. Fixed (and not mobile) broadband providers may not unreasonably discriminate in transmitting lawful network traffic.

Republicans remain unconvinced that such regulations are necessary and claim that they would reduce innovation and job creation. As a result Republicans are attempting to use legislation in the House of Representatives (H.J. Res. 3714 ) to ensure that the FCC open internet order is overturned. Although President Obama will have the power of veto over any such decision meaning that such attempt by Republicans is unlikely to succeed.

In addition, Verizon (despite their vision for an "open internet" referred to above) and MetroPCS are challenging the FCC open internet order, on the grounds that the FCC has exceeded its authority, in the federal appeals court of the District of Columbia. This was the same court in which Comcast successfully challenged the FCC's jurisdiction when Comcast admitted to slowing down and/or blocking traffic to and from BitTorrent (a peer-to-peer protocol)15 . Therefore, it is still uncertain as to whether the FCC open internet order will be fully implemented.

Conclusion

The gap between the philosophical issue of equality for all, as against the commercial costs to the networks and telecoms companies in providing this equality and so controlling the scope of the service offerings, makes this an issue that will not be quickly resolved. It doesn't seem likely that the onset of increased broadband speeds in the UK will negate the net neutrality debate in the near term.

To date the governments of the US and Europe are keen to protect the rights of the individuals regardless of the commercial pressures of some of the largest businesses in the world. The FCC in the US is taking the lead by implementing specific rules to ensure net neutrality whereas it remains to be seen whether the EU Telecoms Reform package will uphold net neutrality principles and ISPs in the UK are attempting to self-regulate to attempt to control the standards by which their traffic management policies are to be judged.

Footnotes

1. Barack Obama podcast on 'Network Neutrality' first broadcast on 8 June 2006 - http://obamaspeeches.com/076-Network-Neutrality-Obama-Podcast.htm

2.http://www.broadbanduk.org/

3.http://www.broadbanduk.org/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_view/gid,1335/Itemid,63/

4.http://consumers.ofcom.org.uk/2010/06/ofcom-opens-debate-on-net-neutrality/

5. Directive 2002/21/EC "on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive)"

6. Directive 2009/140/EC "amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services"

7. Directive 2002/22/EC "on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive)" as amended by Directive 2009/136/EC .

8. The EU Telecoms reform package consists of: (1) Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Office; (2) Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services, Directive 2002/58/EC concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws; and (3) Directive 2009/140/EC (referred to in footnote 6).

9.http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/doc/library/communications_reports/netneutrality/comm-19042011.pdf /p>

10. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-10920871

11. http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/10/finding-common-ground-on-open-internet.html

12. Verizon-Google Legislative Framework Proposal" http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fgoogleblogs%2Fpdfs%2Fverizon_google_legislative_framework_proposal_081010.pdf

13.http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2010/db1223/FCC-10-201A1.pdf

14. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hjres37rh/pdf/BILLS-112hjres37rh.pdf

15. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/06/AR2010040600742.html

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.