UK: Full Steam Ahead For The Bribery Act

Last Updated: 6 April 2011
Article by Maurice Kenton

Following much press speculation and debate on the issue, the Government has announced that the Bribery Act 2010 will come into force on 1 July 2011. It has published the final version of its guidance on procedures that commercial organisations can put into place to prevent bribery, as well as a "quick start guide". At the same time the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) have published prosecution guidance. What does this mean for business in the UK and abroad, and have concerns surrounding the Act now been addressed?


The Bribery Act contains four offences: bribing another person, offences relating to being bribed, bribery of foreign public officials and failure of commercial organisations to prevent bribery. The last offence is of particular interest. A commercial organisation will be guilty of an offence ("the corporate offence") if a person with whom it is associated bribes another person intending to obtain or retain business for the organisation, or to obtain or retain an advantage in the conduct of business for the organisation. "Associated with" is defined broadly to mean a person who performs services for or on behalf of the organisation and will therefore encompass employees, subsidiaries and agents. The corporate offence is committed irrespective of whether the acts or omissions which form the offence take place in the UK or elsewhere. Therefore, a UK corporation may be held responsible for the acts of their foreign agents (who may only have a remote connection to them).

If it is determined that a commercial organisation has committed the offence of failing to prevent bribery, it will be a defence for the organisation to show that it had in place "adequate procedures" to prevent their associates from paying bribes. Notably, the term adequate procedures is not defined by the Act, but the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published guidance on procedures that can be put in place.

New guidance

The final MoJ guidance remains in the principles based form consulted on last year, and is expressed to be flexible and outcomes focussed. It is followed by a number of case studies that illustrate how the principles may be applied. These illustrations now focus on what businesses can do to assess risks and situations in advance, where as the previous draft involved examples where bribery had already occurred.

There are a number of key differences and additions, which seek to address some of the issues and concerns that have been raised about the new regime by professional commentators and in the popular press. Some of the key issues are discussed below:

Proportional and risk based approach

Firstly, the guidance seeks to make it clear with a new first principle, that a proportionate approach can be taken by businesses to implementing procedures to prevent bribery. The guidance notes that small organisations are unlikely to need such extensive procedures as a large multinational organisation, and makes clear that risk assessment procedures should be proportionate to the organisation's size and structure and nature, scale and location of its activities. It is also clear that procedures can be proportionate to the risk that a business faces of bribery, recognising that the threat of bribery varies across jurisdictions, business sectors, business partners and transactions. Principle 3 sets out commentary on the risk assessment process that a business should carry out.

This is something to be welcomed, as it makes it clearer that organisations will not be required to carry out the expensive exercise of putting together lengthy belt and braces policies and procedures where the risk of bribery is objectively speaking very low.

Having said that, it remains the case that where an associated person has committed a bribery offence, the statutory onus of establishing that its procedures were adequate rests on the company. In those circumstances all companies will wish to be able to point to a well considered and proportionate policy and the guidance will not alter that requirement.

Corporate hospitality

The guidance addresses in more detail the issue of corporate hospitality and promotional and business expenditure. The fact that this could be caught by the Act is something that has been the subject of much concern, although in fact under the outgoing law prosecutors commonly scrutinised corporate hospitality as part of any wider investigation into suspected corrupt practices. The guidance expressly states: "Bona fide hospitality and promotional, or other business expenditure which seeks to improve the image of a commercial organisation, better to present products and services, or establish cordial relations, is recognised as an established part of doing business and it is not the intention of the Act to criminalise such behaviour."

The guidance indicates that reasonable and proportionate expenditure is not intended to be prohibited, but at the same time such expenditure can be used as a bribe. In relation to a section 1 bribery offence the guidance sets out that in order to proceed with a conviction the prosecution would need to show that hospitality was intended as a bribe, and this would be judged by what a reasonable person in the UK thought.

In the context of the offence of bribing a foreign public official, the guidance states that the prosecution must be able to prove a sufficient connection between the financial or other advantage given and the intention to influence and secure business or advantage. Relevant evidence will include matters such as the type and level of advantage offered, the manner and form in which it is provided, and the level of influence the official has over awarding the business. It is unlikely the incidental provision of routine business courtesy will raise an inference that it was intended to have a direct impact on decision making particularly where it is commensurate with the reasonable and proportionate norms for the industry. Examples of what may or may not be considered acceptable are included in the guidance.

Although this commentary is very much to be welcomed and means that organisations can be more relaxed about its normal client entertaining, it remains the case that there are some shades of grey as to what will be considered by the SFO and courts to be caught by the Act.


The Act has a wide territorial reach capturing organisations formed outside the UK if they carry on business in the UK. The guidance states that whether a business is carried on in the UK will be a matter of common sense. It is specifically stated that the Government would not expect that the mere fact that a company's securities have been admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange would in itself mean that the company would be caught by the Act. Similarly, having a UK subsidiary will not in itself mean that a parent company is carrying on business in the UK.

Facilitation payments

The guidance is expressly clear that small bribes paid to facilitate routine Government action, known as "facilitation payments" can trigger an offence. This is in contrast to the position under US legislation. The point has been raised in the press that prohibition of such payments may put UK businesses at a disadvantage compared to foreign counterparts when doing business abroad.

The guidance simply accepts that the eradication of such payments is a long-term goal. The SFO has stated prior to the guidance coming out that it will seek to address this issue by prosecuting businesses from outside the UK but which are caught by its wide jurisdiction (as discussed above). However, whether the SFO will have the resources to do so, and how the courts will interpret the jurisdiction provisions in the Act remain to be seen.

Contractors and joint ventures

The broad scope of persons committing bribery for whom the organisation could be liable was another subject of concern. The guidance now clarifies the application of the Act to members of supply chains, joint venture entities, and joint ventures conducted through contractual arrangements.

SFO guidance

A further check on the Act, to ensure that the Act is applied justly and fairly, is the SFO and DPP's prosecution guidance. In common with other criminal offences, prosecutors will only proceed with a case if it passes the evidential stage (a case that does not have sufficient evidence will not proceed, no matter how serious or sensitive it is), and secondly the public interest stage. The prosecution guidance sets out factors that will be considered at the public interest stage, and a prosecution will proceed unless the prosecutor is sure that factors against prosecution outweigh factors in favour.

Factors in favour are: a conviction is likely to attract a significant sentence; the offence is pre-meditated and may involve corruption of the person being bribed; the offence is committed to facilitate more serious offending; and those involved in the bribery take advantage of their position of authority or trust. Factors against are: the court is only likely to impose a minor penalty; the harm was minor and the result of a single incident; and there was a genuine proactive approach including self-reporting and remedial action. The MoJ guidance specifically states that where hospitality, promotional expenditure, or facilitation payments on their face trigger the Act, prosecutors will consider very carefully the public interest test.

Once again, this guidance is something to be welcomed, as it makes it clearer that one bad apple will not necessarily upset the cart. However, it is notable that self-reporting is something flagged up by the guidance. The notion of self-reporting in return for a reduced sentence is not something that sits easily with the UK courts, as has been demonstrated by recent case law (for example in the BAE Systems case).


The final guidance is undoubtedly an improvement on the draft and is to be welcomed, particularly in its recognition that a risk-based and proportionate approach can be taken to preventing bribery. However, Kenneth Clarke's statement that "bribery is one of those things we all know when we see it" rather leaves UK PLC to exercise its own discretion in respect of conduct that is strictly prohibited by the statute but apparently tolerable under the guidance. Whilst it may be clear what is and is not bribery at either end of the scale, there are still shades of grey in between, and no business will want to find that its interpretation of what was required of it or what it did falls on the other side of the line from the SFO. Perhaps inevitably, the guidance does not make everything completely clear. We will have to wait to see how actively the SFO pursue prosecutions under the Act in the current climate, as well as what guidance is produced by the courts in case law.

Summary of the principles:

1. Proportionate procedures – the organisation's procedures to prevent bribery must be proportionate to the risks it faces and the nature, scale and complexity of the organisations' activities. They must be clear, practical, accessible, effectively implemented and enforced.

2. Top level commitment – top-level management are committed to preventing bribery and foster a culture in which bribery is never acceptable.

3. Risk assessment – the organisation periodically assesses the nature and extent of its exposure to risks of bribery on its behalf by persons associated with it on an informed and documented basis.

4. Due diligence – the organisation applies due diligence procedures taking a proportionate and risk based approach in respect of persons who perform or will perform services on its behalf to mitigate identified risks.

5. Communication (including training) – the organisation seeks to ensure its prevention policies and procedures are embedded and understood through communication and training that is proportionate to the risks it faces.

6. Monitoring and review – the organisation monitors and reviews procedures designed to prevent bribery by persons associated with it and makes necessary improvements.

Takeaway points on the new guidance

  • A proportionate and risk based approach is appropriate for organisations implementing adequate procedures to prevent bribery.
  • It is stated the objective of the Act is not to bring the full force of the law to bear on well run organisations that experience an isolated incidence of bribery.
  • There is a recognition that no prevention regime can prevent bribery at all times.
  • Departures from the guidance will not of itself give rise to a presumption that an organisation does not have adequate procedures (although where bribery has taken place the onus is on the organisation to show it had adequate procedures).
  • The Government states that it does not intend to prohibit bona fide reasonable and proportionate hospitality.
  • The jurisdictional reach of the Act is wide, but is not intended to capture companies due to the mere fact that they have securities trading on the London Stock Exchange or that a foreign parent has a UK subsidiary.
  • Facilitation payments are expressly prohibited by the Act.
  • In circumstances where individuals have no alternative to make payments to protect against loss of life, limb or liberty the defence of duress is likely to be available.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.