UK: Finance And Banking Regulatory Update - February 2011

Last Updated: 28 February 2011
Article by Julian Connerty

Bribery Act

We recently reported on a possible review of the Bribery Act and advised that final guidance was expected to be published by the end of January. Publication of that guidance has been delayed (probably because of increased public and political pressure) and is now not expected until mid-late February.

The draft guidance sets out six principles for commercial organisations to help them plan for the new anti-bribery legislation:

  • risk assessment;
  • top level commitment;
  • due diligence;
  • clear, practical and accessible policies and procedures;
  • effective implementation; and
  • monitoring and review.

The final guidance may look significantly different to this but at the very least companies will broadly need to consider these principles when implementing the procedures to prevent bribery which the Act requires, and now is a good time to start.

There has been no suggestion that the Bribery Act itself will be amended, although commencement will be delayed by three months from publication of the Guidance to ensure that companies have time to implement any changes required.

Clyde & Co is hosting two presentations in March in association with the Ministry of Justice, the Serious Fraud Office ("SFO") and Transparency International to discuss the guidance and enforcement of the Act. Please see our website for more information.

BAE Fined in Criminal Prosecution

You may recall the controversial plea bargain in the Innospec case earlier in 2010 and now the Courts have sanctioned yet another plea bargain with BAE (see below). This gives a ray of hope to global commercial entities who may be fighting corruption charges on both sides of the Atlantic or in other jurisdictions and who want the certainty of reaching a global settlement rather than fighting multiple and long running battles.

BAE was fined £500,000 and ordered to pay £225,000 costs following its guilty plea in November for books and records offences in breach of section 221 of the Companies Act 1985. This was part of a controversial plea bargain arrangement with the SFO under which BAE agreed to pay £29.5m in reparations to the Tanzanian Government and the SFO agreed not to bring any prosecutions for any bribery offences which might come to light pre-dating February 2010. The guilty plea followed BAE's global settlement with the US Department of Justice and UK's Serious Fraud Office in 2010. By making no admissions as to bribery offences BAE has been able to ensure that it is still able to tender for Government and EU contracts. The Judge noted the pressure placed upon the Court to ensure the fine it ordered was limited, disclosing that under the deal the fine would be deducted from BAE's reparations to Tanzania and that this was unsatisfactory. The judge also said that the UK Plea Agreement had been loosely and hastily drafted but despite this, and to the surprise of many commentators, the Court agreed the settlement.

The SFO initially began its investigations in 2004, after allegations concerning a contract in Saudi Arabia. The investigations centred on a contract agreed in 1999 between BAE and the government of Tanzania for US$ 39.97 million. This contract was for the supply of a radar defence system for Dar-es-Slam International Airport. BAE engaged Shailesh Vithlani, a local businessman, to advise on its negotiations with the Tanzania government. Between January 2000 and December 2005 approximately US$ 12.4 million was paid to Mr Vithlani. BAE has since accepted that a large proportion of this would have been used to favour BAE in negotiations with the government.

In his judgment, Mr Justice Bean noted that he was "surprised to find a prosecutor granting a blanket indemnity for all offences committed in the past, whether disclosed or otherwise". In his judgment, Mr Justice Bean makes it clear that he thinks the SFO had been too lenient with BAE. He also noted that the "structure of this Settlement Agreement places moral pressure on the Court to keep the fine to a minimum so that the reparation is kept at a maximum." BAE was also ordered to pay £225,000 towards the prosecution's costs.

European Reform

As part of the continuation of financial reform, the European Union has established three new supervisory authorities and a systemic risk board to tighten the net on financial regulation in Europe. The new authorities are intended to achieve better co-ordination between national authorities, and to detect potential risk.

The European Banking Authority ("EBA") was established on 24 November 2010, and has been operating since 1 January 2011. Located in London, the EBA has effectively taken over all existing and ongoing tasks from the Commission of European Banking Supervisors ("CEBS"). The main tasks of the EBA are: to develop guidelines, supervise the implementation of EU legislation, co-ordinate supervisory authorities and improve transparency and disclosure of information. It is hoped that having the EBA in London there will be a particular benefit to the City, as it will prevent regulatory arbitrage, and encourage co-ordination.

The European Securities and Markets Authority ("ESMA") was established to encourage supervisory coordination between securities regulators. The ESMA has effectively taken over the function of the Committee of European Securities Regulators ("CESR"). The main functions of ESMA are to monitor systemic risks of cross-border financial institutions, resolve disagreements between national authorities and draft technical standards that are legally binding in EU member states. ESMA also contributes to the work of the European Systemic Risk Board.

The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority ("EIOPA") has also been established and functions as an independent advisory board to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission. Its responsibilities include ensuring transparency of financial markets and protection of insurance policy holders.

It will be interesting to see whether these reforms will have any real effect in substance, but it is seems to be a step in the right direction to providing more stable, transparent and co-ordinated markets.

MiFID II Review

On 8 December 2010, the European Commission published the MiFID II Review paper. The proposed changes to MiFID will be far-reaching and will impact regulated firms significantly. As part of the Review, the EC has suggested an abolition of execution-only business, and an extension of the products covered by MiFID regulation. Changes have also been proposed regarding the inducements regime, to increase transparency. The responses to the Review will be available on the EC website, and the finalised EC proposal is currently scheduled for release in Spring 2011. However, MiFID II already faces strong criticism from the banking industry with suggestions that it isn't really necessary and just a knee jerk reaction to the credit crunch. Click here for a link to the full Review paper.

FSA fines RBS, NatWest and Barclays

The FSA has continued its string of fines, this time clamping down on the big banks.

In the first few weeks of the New Year, the FSA fined NatWest and RBS £2.8 million for poor complaints handling. The FSA found that RBS and NatWest failed to establish an adequate complaints handling team, and that the complaints team in place did not take account of all relevant considerations. The FSA has suggested that senior management should be more involved to ensure complaints are adequately dealt with.

Shortly thereafter, Barclays found itself facing a fine of £7.7 million for miss-selling funds to investors. Despite identifying problems with the sales of the fund in question early on, Barclays failed to rectify these problems. Barclays' main failing was in providing inadequate advice. The FSA found that Barclays' staff were not sufficiently trained to provide investors with suitable advice.

The fine imposed is the largest ever for failings of retail advice and retail sales. The size of the fine was determined according to the financial resources of Barclays, the seriousness of the breaches, and the deterrent effect to others. It is likely that the vulnerability of those affected, most of whom were over retirement age, was a contributing factor to the size of the fine. Peter Vicary-Smith of the Consumer association Which? has said that the fine imposed by the FSA is too small, and will not act as a strong enough deterrent. However, Barclays has already started to compensate the 12,331 people affected could face a possible £60 million redress bill. Not to mention the cost to Barclays of investigating, and fixing the problem within the bank. In a separate offence, Barclays Capital has also been fined £1.2 million for failing to protect and segregate client money held in sterling money market deposits.

Third Party Payments to unauthorised companies uncovered

In December 2010, the FSA banned and fined a number of accountants working for Natrocell for making payments to third parties without effective checks or controls on those payments.

SLRV, an accountancy firm was initially instructed by Natrocell when Natrocell's shareholders decided to raise capital by selling its shares. SLRV was aware that shares were to be sold by foreign entities not authorised by the FSA. Furthermore, these foreign third parties were to receive 60% commission. Communications were made between SLRV and the third parties using Hotmail and Gmail accounts, and sales were made using methods of cold calling.

Numerous customers took up their concerns directly with SLRV regarding the way the shares were being sold, and investors queried the foreign entities. SLRV failed to realise the problems with Natrocell, and did not inform the FSA as a result of scant regard to money laundering procedures and financial regulation.

SLRV was fined £163,140, and three employees were also fined and banned, with the Money Laundering Reporting Officer, Laurence Finger, being personally fined £35,000. The FSA found that Mr Finger did not properly understand the money laundering reporting rules, and was not properly trained to understand the obvious red flags.

With the dawning of the Bribery Act coming into force, it is vital that firms have in place adequate procedures and measures to prevent obvious failings going under the radar. Firms must undertake proper due diligence of their own, and not rely on that obtained by others.

Senior manager jailed for insider dealing and money laundering

On 21 January 2011, Neil Rollins, a former senior manager of a waste industry firm, was sentenced to 27 months imprisonment for insider dealing and money laundering. Mr Rollins was also ordered to pay nearly £200,000 in compensation.

When Mr Rollins discovered the worsening financial position of PM Group plc, he sold his entire shareholding, and told his wife to do the same. When the financial position of the company was announced to the market, the share price immediately fell by 17% and continued to do so for weeks thereafter. On discovering the FSA's investigations into these dealings, he attempted to hide his conduct by laundering the proceeds, something that the FSA considered aggravated the crime. It is an interesting debate as to whether he did in fact launder the proceeds from this sale, as the sale itself was not actually benefitting from the crime, but merely preventing suffering a loss.

There was a separate civil action in this matter, where Rollins tried to argue that the FSA did not have the power to bring proceedings for money laundering offences. The Supreme Court confirmed on 28 July 2010 that the FSA did have such powers.

Shortly after Rollins was convicted, a city banker and his wife were sentenced for insider dealing. The couple pocketed nearly £600,000 as a result of their insider dealing. His Honour, Judge Leonard QC said that sentences need to deter others: "Those rogue traders that let down the honest, discreet majority must be made to pay". Margaret Cole of the FSA added: "people who commit these market offences will not go unpunished." These convictions show that insider dealing is a real focus for the FSA at the moment.

Revised FSA Remuneration Code: A proportionate response?

On 1 January 2011, the FSA's Revised Remuneration Code came into force rolling out a radical new remuneration regime to around 2,500 financial services firms in the UK. The implications for remuneration structure and policy are set out in an article which can be viewed here. Whilst directly relevant to the financial services sector, the insurance sector should take note as we expect a similar regime for the insurance sector as part of the Solvency II Directive. This is currently due to be implemented at the end of 2012 although it is generally expected that the implementation date will be pushed back into January 2013. Further details on this new regime are expected during the course of 2011 and we will keep you updated on any developments.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.