UK: Revising Brussels I: An Overview of the Commission's Proposal

Last Updated: 14 January 2011
Article by Guy Pendell, Juliette Huard-Bourgois and Will Turner

On 14 December 2010, the European Commission published its proposal in respect of the reform of the 'Brussels I' Regulation (44/2001), which governs the courts' jurisdiction and the recognition of judgments in the EU.  The publication of this proposal represents the latest step in a reform process which was initiated by the Commission in April 2009, and should give rise to a final text in two years.  The amendments  to the Regulation are aimed at increasing the efficiency of the judicial framework in the EU, by reducing the costs and bureaucracy associated with cross-border litigation, and in so doing, creating the necessary legal environment for the European economy to recover.  The UK Government has launched a consultation ending in February 2011 on how the UK should approach the negotiations on the revision of the Brussels I Regulation, which can be accessed by clicking here.  You can also access the Commission's Proposal  by clicking here.

The most significant reform is the abolition of the 'exequatur' procedure, which, if adopted, will allow for the automatic recognition and enforcement of judgments between Member States, thereby reducing cost and administrative burden for those seeking enforcement.  The draft amended Regulation also includes significant changes as to how 'choice of court' agreements are dealt with, and as to how greater access to justice is ensured in respect of disputes involving non-EU defendants.  Notably, the proposal keeps arbitration excluded from the scope of the Regulation, but provides a solution to avoid situations where parties can try to undermine arbitration agreements by initiating inefficient parallel court proceedings.

To view the article in full, please see below:



Full Article

Detailed overview

The 'Brussels I' Regulation (Regulation 44/2001) facilitates civil judicial cooperation in the EU by harmonising the rules of jurisdiction of the EU Member States in a cross-border dispute, and by ensuring the effective recognition and enforcement of judgments issued in another Member State. It is directly applicable in English law. The European Commission's legislative proposal has been published within the context of the obligation contained in the Regulation for a five-yearly review, and follows on from the report and a Green Paper adopted by the Commission in April 2009, which set out the Commission's proposals on possible options for reform.

The proposals for reform have been sent to the European Parliament and the Council to be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure, and final approval of the proposed reforms is expected within the next two to three years.

A summary of the key proposals for reform are as follows.

1. Abolition of 'exequatur' procedure

Currently, under the Regulation, a judgment issued in one Member State does not automatically take effect in another. In order to take effect, the judgment must first be validated and declared enforceable by a court under a special intermediate procedure known as 'exequatur'. This procedure can be time-consuming and expensive, in some cases leading to costs of up to €12,000 for a procedure which can take several months to resolve. A recent survey carried out by the Commission, however, showed that the procedure was a pure formality in approximately 95% of cases.

As such, the Commission has proposed to abolish the exequatur procedure, in so doing removing a significant administrative hurdle for parties to clear in achieving the enforcement of judgments from another Member State. If adopted, judgments in commercial and civil matters rendered by a court in one Member State will thus be automatically enforceable across the EU, with the exception of judgments which relate to defamation or collective redress (to which the exequatur procedure will still apply). The execution of the judgment could still be prevented by a court. However, this would only occur in exceptional (prescribed) circumstances, for example where the defendant was not given proper notice of the proceedings.

2. Disputes involving non-EU countries

Currently, the jurisdiction rules of the Regulation do not apply when the defendant is domiciled outside the EU; in such cases, the relevant national law will apply. Within the EU, national rules on jurisdiction for third country defendants vary widely between Member States, so whilst it may be possible for citizens or companies of one country to sue a defendant outside the EU in the national court, this may not be the case for citizens or companies of a different Member State.

As a result of this perceived 'unequal access to justice', the Commission's proposals are aimed at remedying this lack of uniformity across the EU, and preventing a distortion of competition for companies across the EU which may arise due to unequal business conditions.

The Commission has therefore proposed to extend the Regulation's jurisdictional rules to non-EU countries, which would establish a uniform basis for claimants in the EU to bring proceedings against non-EU defendants in the EU (for example, where the place of performance of the obligation in question is within the EU, despite the fact that the defendant is outside the EU). The amended rules would also ensure that the protective jurisdiction rules which currently apply to consumers, employees and the insured, would also apply if such parties are in dispute with non-EU parties.

The proposal also introduces a discretionary lis pendens rule for disputes on the same subject matter and between the same parties which are pending before the court of a Member State and the court of a non-EU country. In such cases, the court of a Member State could exceptionally stay proceedings if a non-EU court was seised first, and it would be expected to decide within a reasonable time if the decision will be capable of recognition and enforcement in that Member State. This amendment is aimed at preventing parallel proceedings in and outside the EU.

3. Choice of Court Agreements

At present, where proceedings are brought in breach of a jurisdiction agreement, the court specified in the jurisdiction agreement (if second seised) is obliged to stay its proceedings until the court first seised has determined its jurisdiction. In certain jurisdictions, it may take years before a court is able to determine jurisdiction, and it is not uncommon for litigation tactics to be used in order to challenge the validity of the choice of court agreement in another EU Member State to delay proceedings.

The Commission's proposals include amendments which are aimed at improving the effectiveness of choice of court agreements. Where the parties have designated a particular court to resolve a dispute, the chosen court would have priority to decide on its jurisdiction, regardless of whether it is first or second seised. Any other court would have to stay proceedings until the chosen court has established or declined jurisdiction. The modification is designed to increase the effectiveness of choice of court agreements and eliminate the incentives for abusive litigation tactics in non-competent courts.

4. Arbitration

Under the Regulation, arbitration, or any court proceedings which have arbitration as their subject matter, are excluded from its scope. However, the Commission has recognised that in practice, a company that wishes to escape from its obligations under an arbitration agreement can do so relatively easily by claiming that the agreement is invalid, and commencing proceedings in the court of a Member State which may give a favourable decision.

In recognition of this issue, the Commission has included in its proposals a specific rule which obliges a court seised of a dispute to stay proceedings if its jurisdiction is contested on the basis of an arbitration agreement, and an arbitral tribunal has been seised of the case or court proceedings relating to the arbitration agreement have been commenced in the Member State of the seat of arbitration.

This modification is aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of arbitration agreements in Europe, prevent parallel court and arbitration proceedings, and eliminate the incentive for abusive litigation tactics.

5. Other proposals

The Commission's reform proposals also include other amendments such as:

  • the creation of a forum for claims of rights in rem at the place where moveable assets are located;
  • the possibility to conclude a choice of court agreement for disputes concerning the tenancy of premises for professional use; and
  • clarification of the conditions under which provisional and protective measures can circulate in the EU, including measures granted ex parte (subject to certain conditions).

Conclusion

Many of the measures proposed by the Commission have been well-received by the commercial community, not least because of the simplification of certain procedures that under the current Regulation are overly-burdensome and bureaucratic. For example, the abolition of the exequatur procedure represents a seemingly pragmatic step to ensure faster and cheaper settlement of cross-border disputes, and remove what is currently a deterrent for cross-border transactions in Europe.

Further, the proposed reformation of the rules relating to choice of court agreements, if adopted, would have the welcome effect of deterring defendants from using delaying tactics to prevent judgment creditors progressing their claim to judgment (and enforcement) for many years. Recognising the inequity of such practices, and responding to the submissions received by it on this topic in response to its recent consultation exercise, the Commission has taken a sensible step in this regard.

However, there are areas of the Commission's proposed reforms which are likely to stimulate lively debate. For example, the Commission's extension of the Regulation to include previously unregulated areas, such as the rules relating to non-EU parties, represents a radical change from the previous position. The changes would appear to have the effect of potentially removing the existing English common law rules relating to grounds of jurisdiction. The extension of the protective rules relating to consumers, employees and the insured, ensuring that preference is given to the courts of those parties' domiciles when in dispute with non-EU parties, will be of particular concern to employers, insurers and retailers.

Finally, although there were concerns following the Commission's Green Paper that the arbitration exclusion would be removed, the proposed draft amended Regulation maintains the arbitration exception, but seeks to remedy the problem highlighted by the recent West Tankers case without compromising the independence of the arbitration process. In the West Tankers case, the ECJ ruled that an English court could not issue an anti-suit injunction restraining parallel litigation in Italy, in favour of an arbitration agreement that specified England as the seat of arbitration. The amendments to the Regulation in this area would appear to have solved this problem, ensuring that the Member State within which the chosen seat of arbitration/ arbitral tribunal is located has first priority to determine jurisdiction. The impossibility for the English courts to issue an anti-suit injunction within the EU would still remain even in arbitration cases. In its consultation paper on "How should the UK approach the negotiations", the Ministry of Justice has therefore reserved its position on the viability of the Commission's proposal until it has consulted extensively with the arbitration community.

There remains a lengthy process before the Commission's proposals are formally adopted, including two rounds of readings and amendments by the Council and the European Parliament, followed by a 'conciliation procedure' carried out by the Conciliation Committee. It is likely that the adoption of the amended Regulation, if approved, will take place within the next two to three years, but it will be important to monitor the reaction to, and genesis of, the Regulation during that time.

For link to Commission Proposal, please click here.

For link to Government Consultation paper, please click here.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 13/01/2011.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.