UK: IP Snapshot - December 2010

Last Updated: 6 January 2011
Article by Nick Beckett, Isabel Davies and Tom Scourfield

Bringing you regular news of key developments in intellectual property law.


The Olympics, Paralympics and London Olympics Association Rights (Infringement Proceedings) Regulations 2010, SI 2010 no. 2477.

These Regulations provide for the High Court to make orders concerning goods infringing the London Olympics association right, which arises from the London Olympic and Paralympic Games Act 2006. The Regulations also make amendment to the Olympic Association Right (Infringement Proceedings) Regulations 1995 which concern enforcement of the Olympics Association Right (arising from the Olympic Symbol etc. (Protection) Act 1995) in order to ensure that the 1995 Regulations apply to the Paralympic Games.

For the full text of the regulations, click here

(1) Och-Ziff Management Europe Ltd (2) OZ Management LP v (1) OCH Capital LLP (2) Union Investment Management Ltd (3) Thomas Tadeus Antoni Ochocki [2010] EWHC 2599 (Ch) (High Court)

The Claimants' dispute related to a Community Trade Mark (CTM) for OCH-ZIFF and the use by the Defendant, OCH Capital, under the marks "OCH" and "OCH CAPITAL". This case is the first to specifically endorse the doctrine of initial interest confusion and confirm that a trade mark can be infringed under Article 9(1)(b) (likelihood of confusion) even where by the time of purchase the consumer is no longer confused as to the origin of the goods and services.

For our full Law-Now on this important decision, click here

For the full text of the decision, click here

Strategi Group Ltd v OHIM, Case T-92/09

The EU General Court upheld an OHIM Board of Appeal decision that the publisher of the magazine Strategies and the owner of the work mark STRATEGIÉS (registered in France for a number of goods and services) was entitled to rely on its use of its mark as a magazine title in opposition proceedings to an application to register the word mark STRATEGI as a CTM in Class 35. The court ruled that the appeal board was right to hold that a magazine title could constitute a valid use of a trade mark, provided that the services in question were provided through the magazine.

For the full text of the decision, click here

DHL Express (France) SAS v Chronopost SA

Case C-235/09, Advocate General's opinion

Chronopost brought trade mark infringement proceedings against DHL before the French court in respect of the word "WEBSHIPPING". It was held that there had been trade mark infringement and the court made an order prohibiting DHL from continuing with the infringing acts in France. It was referred to the ECJ to ascertain the territorial scope of the prohibition and the supporting penalty payment. The Attorney General considered that a prohibition issued by a national court acting as a Community trade mark court has effect as a matter of law throughout the entire area of the EU. However, where the infringement or action for infringement is limited to a specific geographical or linguistic area, the court's order is limited territorially.

For the full text of the press release, click here

Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB v OHIM

Case R-443/2010-2

An OHIM Board of Appeal allowed an appeal by Sony Ericsson against the decision that a movement mark was not eligible for registration as it was not graphically represented. Probably the most interesting aspect of this appeal was the willingness of the board to take into consideration previous successful movement marks. However, this may change as more movement marks are registered over time.

For the full text of the decision, click here.

Lidl SNC v Vierzon Distribution SA (Case 159/09)

The European Court of Justice has ruled that a retailer's use of comparative advertising to highlight price differences between its goods and those of its competitor may not be misleading, even though the products being compared are not identical. The decision concerns the interpretation of European Directive 84/450/EEC (the "Directive"), following a referral to the ECJ by the French national court.

For the full text of the decision, click here


Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores (SGAE)
Case C-467/08

The ECJ have answered a number of questions on the interpretation of Article 5(2)(b) of the Copyright Directive which allows Member States to provide for an exception to Article 2 where a reproduction is made by a natural person for private use.

Here, the ECJ held that the indiscriminate application of a private copying levy to all types of digital reproduction equipments, devices and media is incompatible with the Copyright Directive. Private copying levies should not be charged on goods sold to businesses.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Paul Gregory Allen (acting as trustee of Adrian Jacobs (deceased) v (1) Bloomsbury Publishing plc (2) Joanne Kathleen Murray (professionally known as JK Rowling) [2010] EWHV 2560 (Ch)

The High Court has refused to grant JK Rowling and her publishers summary judgment on a copyright infringement claim made against them in relation to Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, which was alleged to have copied aspects of the plot and themes of a book called Willy the Wizard, written by Adrian Jacobs.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Crosstown Music Company 1 LLC v Rive Droite Music Ltd and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1222

The Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of the High Court in finding that a clause in a songwriting agreement, which provided for an automatic reversion of copyright to the songwriter in the event of a breach of contract by the other party, was valid. There is no statutory or common law authority which states that such clauses are incompatible with the partial nature of the assignments of copyright permitted under section 90 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Charities' exemption under the CDPA 1988 to be repealed

From 1 January 2011, charities and not-for profit organisations who use recorded music will require a licence from Phonographic Performance Ltd (PPL), a UK collecting society for performers and record companies, and PRS for Music (formerly the Performing Rights Society).

The Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and others v Meltwater Holding BV and others [2010] EWHC 3099 (Ch)

In this case, the High Court ruled that the end users of an online news-monitoring service needed a web end-user licence from the Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd, as without one they were infringing newspaper publishers' copyright. It also confirms that copyright subsists in a newspaper headline.

For the full text of the decision, click here


EPO Decision T-0784/06, 3 March 2008, Beckman Coulter Inc

In this case, the EPO Board of Appeal extracted the legal principles from decision G3/08 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal, and applied those principles to a case in the biotechnology sector.

Although the patent in question related to subject matter in the biotechnology sector, it was also essentially a mathematical process. The Board of Appeal held that it was not excluded from patentability as a mathematical method "as such", but that the application failed for lack of inventive step.

The case is noteworthy as it shows how the EPO's policy of "the raising of the bar" (perhaps on the back of G3/08, which was widely regarded as a weak decision) may be causing a more stringent approach to be taken.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG v Derek Scott (t/a Scotts Potato Machinery) [2010] EWCA Civ 1110

The Court of Appeal has held that a patent for a potato-harvesting machine was wholly valid. The decision is particularly interesting regarding contributory infringement under s.60(2) Patents Act 1977, holding that the intention to put the invention into effect need not be the intention of any specific person. The issue to consider is whether the "means" and the circumstances on which it was offered/supplied were such that at least some ultimate users would intend to use or adapt the "means" so as to infringe.

This decision will make it harder for alleged contributory infringers to escape liability, particularly where they have made it easy for the end-user to modify the item so that it directly infringes. The comments on the importance of foreign decisions are a clear warning to lawyers that research should not be limited to UK case law.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Alk-Abello Limited v (1) Meridian Medical Technologies (2) Dey Pharma LP [2010] EWPCC 14

New rules for the Patents County Court (PCC) came into effect on 1 October 2010. While previous guidance existed on determining transfers between the PCC and the High Court, the PCC took the first application for such a transfer since the new rules came into effect as an opportunity to set out new guidance on transfers.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Edward Knight [2010] EWPCC 16

New rules for streamlining procedures at the Patents County Court (PCC) came into effect on 1 October 2010. This case was the first case management conference to be held under the new procedures and is an illustration of how the PCC will take a more active role in case management, giving directions which restrict both issues to be considered and evidence which could be served.

For the full text of the decision, click here

KCI Licensing v Smith & Nephew [2010] EWCA Civ 1260

The Court of Appeal has allowed some of the grounds of appeal from the High Court decision on the infringement and validity of two patents relating to a system for assisting wound-healing. In the High Court Justice Arnold held that both patents were valid and that all but one of the acts complained of constituted contributory infringement under section 60(2) Patents Act 1977 ("PA"). The Court of Appeal construed the claims of the First Patent differently to the trial judge and held that Smith & Nephew (S&N) did not infringe. Regarding claim construction, the Court of Appeal also differed from the trial judge in relation to the validity of one of the asserted claims of the Second Patent, holding it was invalid for a lack of inventive step. The Court of Appeal applied the judgment from Grimme v Scott earlier this year regarding section 60(2) PA, and held that Justice Arnold had applied the wrong test of contributory infringement, and that therefore S&N had infringed the claim of the second patent for which the Court had upheld the finding of validity.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Cephalon Inc & others v Orchid Europe Ltd and Generics (UK) Ltd
High Court

The High Court refused an interim injunction in an action for patent infringement brought by Cephalon and licensees relating to patents for a narcolepsy drug, against the manufacturer and the European distributor of a generic. Instead a speedy trial was ordered for April 2011. There was a serious issue to be tried, despite the evidence of infringement being weak. However, the defendant had the stronger arguments on balance of convenience. The market for the drug was relatively mature and it would be possible to assess the claimants' lost profits if an injunction were refused. However, if an injunction were granted, there was no way of assessing how much of the market the defendants would lose. The evidence established that loss to the defendants was more likely to occur, more likely to be substantial and would be more difficult to quantify.

For the full text of the decision, click here


Beechwood House Publishing Ltd v Guardian Products Ltd and another [2010] EWPCC 12
The Patents County Court refused to grant summary judgment for a claim of infringement of database rights because the claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate how much data the defendants had extracted from the claimant's database, hence it was not able to be considered a "substantial" extraction.

For the full text of the decision, click here
Football Dataco Limited and others v Sportradar GmbH and another [2010] EWHC 2911 (Ch)

This case held that the English court had jurisdiction to consider various heads of claim relating to copyright and database right infringement where the defendants were based outside the UK and had made allegedly infringing material available online from servers also based outside of the UK. Re-utilisation of database content occurs where the data-containing server is based, rather than where the data is downloaded from the internet.

For the full text of the decision, click here

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 23/12/2010.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.