We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
This is entry No.10, first published on 6 December, of a blog on
Public Bodies Reform. Click here to view the whole blog. If you would like to be
notified when the blog is updated, with links sent by email, click
here.
No doubt others affected by the reform of public bodies are
paddling as hard underwater but it does look as if the film sector
is in some ways now in the front row when it comes to moving
forward to the brave new world brought on by quango immolation.
The industry appeared to have been caught entirely by surprise
when it was announced in the Commons on 26 July and without any
prior consultation that the UK Film Council, a non departmental
public body funded through and distributing lottery money to the
film industry, was to go. Furthermore, what was to take its place,
if anything, was then none too clear. But, following widespread
dismay, letters of concern from the likes of Clint Eastwood and
queries from the Government as to whether the UKFC was using its
funding inappropriately to stir up a lobby against the change,
events have moved swiftly on and plans now appear to be well
advanced for the British Film Institute (BFI) to assume the
UKFC's role and to do so by April of next year.
As some industry commentators have remarked, this is a
remarkable turnaround given that the BFI , which is responsible for
the BFI Southbank centre, runs the London Film Festival and looks
after the National Film Archive, was itself effectively
side-tracked and put under the thrall of the UKFC following that
bodies' creation in 2001. Labour had also considered merging
the BFI into the UKFC with the BFI in the secondary role. But, now
the BFI, under its chairman Greg Dyke, is to regain its place as
the lead representative of the film industry.
So what does this all mean for the BFI's governance? Ed
Vaizey, the Culture Minister responsible has said : "The BFI
will change fundamentally. It will become more open to partnerships
with others, more engaged with the nations and the regions, more
able to realise an exciting vision of a coherent, joined up film
industry. These plans will involve a renewed BFI Board and senior
management structure reflecting the BFI's new responsibilities.
Current board vacancies will be filled quickly, following an open
process run by the BFI." The BFI in some FAQs confirms:
"We will be bringing on new Governors who are senior figures
in the film industry, we will be introducing committee structures
to address the Lottery distribution and we will create a Film
Strategy Advisory Board drawn from all sectors of the film industry
and including the devolved Nations and English regions."
It also means reform beyond the BFI and the UKFC. It has also
been announced that the eight separate Regional Screen Agencies
will now re-configure themselves as a single national body,
Creative England, chaired by John Newbigin, with three hubs in the
north, Midlands and south. These will continue to support new
talent and new businesses wherever they are located, building on
their intimate knowledge of the cities and regions in which they
have been based. They will engage with the industry to ensure that
the views of the sector are properly taken into account. Evidently,
the BFI is to establish strategic partnerships with Creative
England, Film London which will remain outside the Creative England
structure, and with the film agencies in the Nations - Creative
Scotland, the Film agency for Wales, Northern Ireland Screen - to
ensure that public funding - Lottery and where relevant
grant-in-aid - continues to support film in the Nations and the
regions.
Presumably, the BFI will need to amend its charter and there may
be issues to resolve in terms of governmental and parliamentary
accountability. Granted a Royal Charter on its 50th anniversary in
1983 (that charter then being amended by scheme of the Charity
Commissioners in 2000), the BFI was established in 1933 as a
private company and was the subject of an Act of Parliament in 1949
which authorised the Treasury to make grants to it. As with the
changes made in 2000, any revision of its charter will need to pass
the scrutiny of the Charity Commissioners and approval of the Privy
Council.
For more details on:
a) BFI history, see: here b) the Royal Charter, see here
c) BFI FAQs: here
d) Ed Vaizey speech: here e) UKFI website: here
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (the Bill) (formerly known as the Great Repeal Bill) was introduced to the House of Commons and given its First Reading (a formal stage, without debate)...
With the third round of exit negotiations under way, this post looks at where the negotiations currently stand, examines the impact of DExEU's latest position papers and a looks ahead...
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
