ARTICLE
8 November 2010

Financial Ombudsman Award Bars Further Recovery in Civil Proceedings

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

A High Court judgement handed down yesterday confirms that a claimant who accepts a final decision from the Financial Ombudsman Service is bound by it and will not subsequently be able to bring a civil claim in relation to the same matter.
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A High Court judgement handed down yesterday confirms that a claimant who accepts a final decision from the Financial Ombudsman Service is bound by it and will not subsequently be able to bring a civil claim in relation to the same matter.

The FOS provides consumers with a voluntary, quick, free and informal dispute resolution service.  It is also free from the risk of the complainant having to pay the defendant firm's costs should the complaint fail.  Accordingly, it has many advantages over civil court proceedings. 

On the other hand, the FOS' processes are not as rigorous as those of a court.  Furthermore, the FOS is free to reach its decisions based on what an Ombudsman considers to be fair and reasonable; although the law needs to be taken into account, an Ombudsman does not have to apply it.

For these reasons, the FOS' binding award limit is £100,000.  (Although this limit is currently under review and the FSA has proposed that it should be increased to £150,000 from January 2012.)

Today's decision brings some clarity to an issue that had not previously been tested in the courts:  can a complainant accept a FOS award and then subsequently sue in the civil courts for additional losses?  The answer is clearly "no". 

Of course, this will be of most relevance in complaints where losses exceed £100,000.  In such cases, a complainant has a choice when deciding whether to accept an Ombudsman's award, either to take the redress awarded by the Ombudsman, subject to the £100,000 limit, or instead to reject the decision and pursue a claim in the civil courts in order to make a full recovery without limit.  What he cannot do is accept the FOS award and then seek the balance at court.

The decision will come as good news to FSA regulated firms and their insurers as it provides yet further confirmation that the FOS is an inappropriate forum for high value claims.

Further reading

Bunney v Burns Anderson plc

[2007] EWHC 1240 (Ch)
Andrews v SBJ Benefit Consultants [2010], as yet unreported

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 05/11/2010.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More