UK: Unfair Trade Rules - A Comparison Of The Position In The UK, France And Germany

Last Updated: 26 October 2010
Article by Dr. Gordon Christian, Natasha Assadi-Tardif and Sophia Sperlich

In-house competition and compliance counsel will be well aware how important it is for their companies – in their day-today business dealings with customers, suppliers and competitors – to comply with competition rules at both EU and national level. However, in some member states, the applicable competition rules are supplemented by unfair trade rules that sometimes prohibit certain conduct or require certain dealings where the ordinary competition rules would not do so. A key characteristic of unfair trade rules is that, although (in certain countries such as France) they were introduced in response to abusive practices in the groceries sector, they apply to all business-to-business relations and do not require competition to be adversely affected. Unilateral behaviour is subject to these rules, regardless of the market share of the parties. In some countries, such as France and Germany, infringement of these rules is punishable by courts and the competition authorities have no jurisdiction over these questions. A number of prohibitions are covered by the unfair trade rules, including abrupt termination of a commercial relationship, most favoured nation clauses and upfront access payments. In this article, the authors analyse how the unfair trade rules apply in these three areas in the UK, France and Germany.

Termination of commercial relationships

Commercial agents

The first situation in which termination follows specific rules is if the party whose commercial relationship is being terminated is a "commercial agent" as defined by the Commercial Agents Directive (implemented in the UK, France and Germany). A commercial agent will generally be entitled to compensation on termination of the agency agreement.

UK position

Subject to the two exceptions mentioned below, there are no specific unfair trade rules in the UK that prevent the termination of existing commercial relationships. In English law, parties are free to contract (and correspondingly to stop contracting) as they wish. If an existing commercial relationship is governed by a written contract, any termination will be covered by the relevant provisions. However, if the existing commercial relationship is not governed by a written contract, common law principles will govern any termination, essentially requiring a "reasonable" period of notice.

The second exception to the general rule described above is a provision that only applies in a retail context. Following a 2008 Competition Commission (CC) market investigation into the groceries sector, the CC imposed a number of remedies. It was concerned about supply chain practices arising from the inequality of bargaining power between various grocery retailers and suppliers. Among other things, it was said that certain grocery retailers did not always abide by supply agreements, asked for additional payments without proper justification or unduly delayed due payments.

Therefore, one of the remedies put in place by the CC is a new, tougher code of practice called the groceries supply code of practice (GSCOP). GSCOP is relevant in the present context because it provides for a specific procedure that must be followed when supplier products are delisted and the commercial relationship is therefore terminated. Failure to follow the prescribed procedure enables the supplier to take the grocery retailer to arbitration and, once it is set up in 2012, the groceries code adjudicator for a binding decision.

French position

As a matter of principle, putting an end (even partially) to a commercial relationship is prohibited under French law where there has been no material breach or force majeure situation, unless sufficient prior notice is granted.

Substantially and unilaterally modifying the terms and conditions of a commercial relationship has been considered by French courts in certain cases as amounting to termination.

Therefore, if a contracting party makes things commercially very difficult for the other party – for instance, by unilaterally imposing a significant price increase – it could be argued that this is a form of termination. Similarly, limiting the commercial relationship – for instance, by substantially decreasing sales or purchases – is considered as a partial termination that must be preceded by sufficient notice.

French courts assess the acceptable length of notice periods on a case-by-case basis independently of the fact that a notice period has been provided for in the parties' agreement. The main features that should be taken into account are set out below, the first three features being the most important ones: (1) the length of the relationship; (2) the proportion of the non-terminating party's turnover attributable or related to the relationship; (3) the existence of exclusivity and/or noncompete obligations; (4) the investments made by the nonterminating party in the context of these relationships; (5) the existence (or indeed lack of) alternative suppliers/customers; and (6) the reputation of the products.

According to French case law, an established commercial relationship is not only characterised by the existence of a written agreement. It covers the entire relationship of the parties, also where there have been successive agreements and/or continuous sales and purchases.

As a consequence, any termination of a commercial relationship must be analysed to ensure that it does not constitute an abrupt termination, even where there is an agreement that provides for a specific notice period or where the relationship has not been underscored by a written agreement.

German position

As a general rule, German law protects the contractual freedom of commercial undertakings, including the freedom to terminate commercial contracts. Specific unfair trade rules only apply to dominant undertakings, which are under an obligation to enter into a contract with a customer to avoid breaching German law – section 826 German Civil Code (BGB) – for causing "loss contrary to public policy". If such an obligation to contract exists, a termination of an existing contract by the dominant undertaking can amount to an unfair hindrance contrary to German competition law – section 20 Act against Restraints of Competition (GWB)) – and therefore be void. However, the termination is only void if, on closer examination of the individual case, it can be shown that the obligation to contract would result in a contract substantially similar to the existing one.

Most favoured nation (MFN) clauses

An MFN clause requires a supplier to treat the buyer as well as it treats any other buyer.

MFN clauses that do not prevent, restrict or distort competition do not fall under article 101(1) TFEU and are allowed. An example are retrospective MFN clauses, where the contracting party agrees to grant the most favourable conditions to the customer as previously granted to other customers.

MFN clauses that prevent, restrict or distort competition are exempted under the European Commission's vertical block exemption regulation (VBER) if the market share of each of the contracting party and the customer is below 30%.

If the MFN clauses are not exempted by the VBER, they will have to be assessed individually under article 101(3) TFEU. To assess whether the MFN clause in question prevents, restricts or distorts competition, the guidelines are used. Considerations include, among others, the nature of the agreement, the market position of the parties and their competitors, as well as buyers of the contract products and barriers to entry.

The two main concerns that can arise from the use of MFN clauses are retail price maintenance (RPM) and the exchange of commercially sensitive information. RPM can arise because a supplier has no incentive to lower prices for customers other than the MFN customer because such decreases will have to be matched (and occasionally may incur retrospective compensation). Information exchange can arise because, in order to know whether the MFN clause is in fact being given due effect, the MFN customer needs to know the prices being charged by the supplier to other customers.

UK position

There are no recent OFT decisions regarding MFN clauses. In any event, there are no specific UK unfair trade rules on MFN clauses and the UK position is largely determined by the VBER and accompanying guidelines. The European Commission has concluded in a number of cases (such as gas pipelines, Opodo, Hollywood film distribution and copyright societies) that MFN clauses can give rise to competition concerns such as those referred to above (ie RPM and information exchange). However, in practice, MFN clauses, when investigated at European Commission level, have not given rise to fines but the parties have generally removed MFN clauses from their agreements so that the Commission can then close the case.

French position

Automatically benefiting from more favourable conditions granted to competitors by the contracting party is prohibited under French unfair trade rules as amended in 2008.

It is also prohibited to obtain or seek to obtain an advantage from a business partner that does not correspond to a commercial service provided, or is manifestly disproportionate to the value of the service provided. Such an advantage could also include a request to bring commercial conditions into line with commercial conditions granted to other customers.

These prohibitions were introduced to bring parties to the negotiating table and avoid abuses of bargaining power, created by the automatic nature and lack of consideration implicit in these sorts of clauses.

The newly amended unfair trade rules go even further by prohibiting the imposition of or any attempt to impose conditions on a business partner that create a significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties.

The notion of "significant imbalance" is extremely vague and judges have a great deal of discretion in interpreting it. It is therefore worthwhile for parties to undertake a detailed review of their contracts, to ensure that there are no risks under the French unfair trade rules regime.

German position

In Germany, the GWB, together with the VBER and accompanying guidelines, govern the treatment of MFN clauses.

Prior to 2005, MFN clauses that imposed an obligation on the supplier were held to hinder competition and were void under German law. Since 2005, EU law (including the VBER and the guidelines) has been integrated into the application of the GWB by reference (section 2(2) GWB).

Additionally, if a dominant undertaking uses excessive pressure to obtain a favourable MFN clause, the conduct could fall under the German Act against Unfair Competition (UWG) section 4, para 1 and 10, in which case the conduct needs to be stopped and an action for damages can arise (see below).

Upfront access payments / listing fees

Upfront access payments (UAPs) are common in the retail sector, where grocery retailers will often require such payments from suppliers. UAPs are defined in the European Commission's recent VBER guidelines as fixed fees that suppliers pay to distributors in the framework of a vertical relationship at the beginning of a relevant period, in order to get access to their distribution network and remunerate services provided to the suppliers by the distributors.

According to the VBER, UAPs are allowed in principle (if the market share of both the manufacturer and the retailer are each below 30%) and are only exceptionally found to result in anticompetitive foreclosure. UAPs can lead to a more efficient allocation of shelf space, reduce the asymmetry in information between suppliers and distributors and so benefit customers.

In the VBER guidelines, UAPs may have anticompetitive effects on the market and will not be exempted, where they (1) lead to anticompetitive foreclosure (ie the widespread use of upfront access payments increases the barriers to entry for small entrants); (2) lead to an increase in the retail price and reduce the incentive to compete on price on the downstream market (ie where the distribution market is highly concentrated); and (3) increase the barriers to entry for smaller suppliers on the market.

UK position

In the UK, the grocery retail sector has been under significant regulatory scrutiny by the competition authorities for some time. The latest in-depth investigation was the CC market investigation into the groceries sector (referred to above). During that investigation, the CC received a number of complaints about UK grocery retailers imposing UAPs.

However, the CC was unable to find any evidence to suggest that lump-sum payments to grocery retailers act as a significant barrier to entry or expansion for small suppliers. In addition, the CC did not find any evidence that obtaining lump-sum payments from suppliers distorts competition between grocery retailers or between suppliers. Rather, the CC considered that by compensating a retailer for the risks and costs of listing new products, UAPs such as slotting allowances may facilitate the introduction of products that retailers may otherwise be deterred from stocking.

This relatively relaxed view of UAPs is mirrored in the (more recent) VBER guidelines' treatment of UAPs, where the European Commission only identifies competition concerns in a small number of scenarios (such as where the UAPs are so high that they constitute a barrier to entry for smaller suppliers).

Nevertheless, as a result of the GSCOP remedy, since February 2010 major grocery retailers in the UK are subject to a new code. This states that a retailer must not directly or indirectly require a supplier to make any payment as a condition of stocking or listing that supplier's grocery products, unless such payment is made (1) in relation to a promotion; or (2) in respect of grocery products which have not been stocked, displayed or listed by that retailer during the preceding 365 days in 25% or more of its stores, and reflects a reasonable estimate by that retailer of the risk run by that retailer in stocking, displaying or listing such new grocery products.

French position

UAPs are not prohibited per se and are also common practice in the retail sector in France. However, they should not be required without being part of an actual commercial relationship and being accompanied by orders.

French unfair trade rules prohibit obtaining or seeking to obtain an advantage, as a precondition to placing orders, without a written agreement on a proportionate volume of purchase. In other words, asking for a fee to be paid without any consideration is prohibited.

German position

The UWG, in combination with the GWB, can prohibit UAPs or other conduct which has the potential to hinder noticeably competitors, consumers or other participants in the market (section 3 UWG; examples listed in section 4 UWG).

Where a retailer demands UAPs from its supplier, threatening to treat the supplier detrimentally if such UAPs are not paid (ie threatening to terminate or not to enter into a commercial relationship), such conduct is generally allowed, unless the retailer is a dominant undertaking or threatens the use of other, unfair conduct (eg to break existing contracts, to denigrate him to third parties or to leak internal issues to the public). However, the provisions of the UWG are used restrictively so as not to undermine the GWB provisions protecting competition.

Penalties

There are specific penalty regimes in France and Germany that are somewhat different from the UK.

French position

French unfair trade rules provide that any interested third party can bring an action for damages to compensate for losses suffered. Although unfair trade rules do not fall within the French competition authority's jurisdiction, the authority's president can refer a case to courts if there is a possible unfair trade infringement. In addition, the minister of economy and the public prosecutor can request that courts (1) order that the practices be stopped and/or (2) declare an infringing clause void and/or (3) order the reimbursement of the sums unduly paid and/or (4) impose a civil fine amounting to a maximum of €2m which can be increased to three times the sums unduly paid.

Up to now, the minister of economy has mainly brought actions to protect suppliers against large retail chains (recently imposing a civil fine of €300,000), but these rules can be applied in all sectors.

The number of lawsuits based on unfair trade rules increases every year (approximately 16 judgments in 2005, 21 in 2006, 29 in 2007 and 35 in 2008). The total amount of fines in 2008 was €1.54m, although individual fines can be as little as €20,000.

It should be noted that, to avoid lack of enforcement of these provisions, the minister of economy and/or the public prosecutor can bring cases even if the "victim" does not wish for this to happen.

German position

In Germany, an action for damages can be brought by competitors under section 9 UWG. However, this only applies to direct competitors and does not enable damages to be claimed by parties which are in a vertical relationship with the defendants. Damages can only be claimed where the infringement of the UWG has been committed intentionally or negligently. Damages caused by the infringement are assessed under the German civil code and are calculated as the loss of profits. The damages can be estimated by the court under the German civil procedure rules. If the damages are estimated by the court, the claimant has to provide at least the basis on which the damages are calculated, which can prove difficult. Additionally, restitution can be claimed in certain cases.

Conclusion

It is clear from the above-mentioned analysis that France stands out as the jurisdiction where unfair trade rules cover a particularly broad array of conduct and where the uncertainty about how certain key concepts will be applied is greatest. Nevertheless, the authors believe that all in-house competition and regulatory counsel would do well to remember that competition law is not the only area where businesses are exposed to significant risks – unfair trade rules can also lead to similarly undesirable consequences when they are breached.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions