UK: Unfair Trade Rules - A Comparison Of The Position In The UK, France And Germany

Last Updated: 26 October 2010
Article by Dr. Gordon Christian, Natasha Assadi-Tardif and Sophia Sperlich

In-house competition and compliance counsel will be well aware how important it is for their companies – in their day-today business dealings with customers, suppliers and competitors – to comply with competition rules at both EU and national level. However, in some member states, the applicable competition rules are supplemented by unfair trade rules that sometimes prohibit certain conduct or require certain dealings where the ordinary competition rules would not do so. A key characteristic of unfair trade rules is that, although (in certain countries such as France) they were introduced in response to abusive practices in the groceries sector, they apply to all business-to-business relations and do not require competition to be adversely affected. Unilateral behaviour is subject to these rules, regardless of the market share of the parties. In some countries, such as France and Germany, infringement of these rules is punishable by courts and the competition authorities have no jurisdiction over these questions. A number of prohibitions are covered by the unfair trade rules, including abrupt termination of a commercial relationship, most favoured nation clauses and upfront access payments. In this article, the authors analyse how the unfair trade rules apply in these three areas in the UK, France and Germany.

Termination of commercial relationships

Commercial agents

The first situation in which termination follows specific rules is if the party whose commercial relationship is being terminated is a "commercial agent" as defined by the Commercial Agents Directive (implemented in the UK, France and Germany). A commercial agent will generally be entitled to compensation on termination of the agency agreement.

UK position

Subject to the two exceptions mentioned below, there are no specific unfair trade rules in the UK that prevent the termination of existing commercial relationships. In English law, parties are free to contract (and correspondingly to stop contracting) as they wish. If an existing commercial relationship is governed by a written contract, any termination will be covered by the relevant provisions. However, if the existing commercial relationship is not governed by a written contract, common law principles will govern any termination, essentially requiring a "reasonable" period of notice.

The second exception to the general rule described above is a provision that only applies in a retail context. Following a 2008 Competition Commission (CC) market investigation into the groceries sector, the CC imposed a number of remedies. It was concerned about supply chain practices arising from the inequality of bargaining power between various grocery retailers and suppliers. Among other things, it was said that certain grocery retailers did not always abide by supply agreements, asked for additional payments without proper justification or unduly delayed due payments.

Therefore, one of the remedies put in place by the CC is a new, tougher code of practice called the groceries supply code of practice (GSCOP). GSCOP is relevant in the present context because it provides for a specific procedure that must be followed when supplier products are delisted and the commercial relationship is therefore terminated. Failure to follow the prescribed procedure enables the supplier to take the grocery retailer to arbitration and, once it is set up in 2012, the groceries code adjudicator for a binding decision.

French position

As a matter of principle, putting an end (even partially) to a commercial relationship is prohibited under French law where there has been no material breach or force majeure situation, unless sufficient prior notice is granted.

Substantially and unilaterally modifying the terms and conditions of a commercial relationship has been considered by French courts in certain cases as amounting to termination.

Therefore, if a contracting party makes things commercially very difficult for the other party – for instance, by unilaterally imposing a significant price increase – it could be argued that this is a form of termination. Similarly, limiting the commercial relationship – for instance, by substantially decreasing sales or purchases – is considered as a partial termination that must be preceded by sufficient notice.

French courts assess the acceptable length of notice periods on a case-by-case basis independently of the fact that a notice period has been provided for in the parties' agreement. The main features that should be taken into account are set out below, the first three features being the most important ones: (1) the length of the relationship; (2) the proportion of the non-terminating party's turnover attributable or related to the relationship; (3) the existence of exclusivity and/or noncompete obligations; (4) the investments made by the nonterminating party in the context of these relationships; (5) the existence (or indeed lack of) alternative suppliers/customers; and (6) the reputation of the products.

According to French case law, an established commercial relationship is not only characterised by the existence of a written agreement. It covers the entire relationship of the parties, also where there have been successive agreements and/or continuous sales and purchases.

As a consequence, any termination of a commercial relationship must be analysed to ensure that it does not constitute an abrupt termination, even where there is an agreement that provides for a specific notice period or where the relationship has not been underscored by a written agreement.

German position

As a general rule, German law protects the contractual freedom of commercial undertakings, including the freedom to terminate commercial contracts. Specific unfair trade rules only apply to dominant undertakings, which are under an obligation to enter into a contract with a customer to avoid breaching German law – section 826 German Civil Code (BGB) – for causing "loss contrary to public policy". If such an obligation to contract exists, a termination of an existing contract by the dominant undertaking can amount to an unfair hindrance contrary to German competition law – section 20 Act against Restraints of Competition (GWB)) – and therefore be void. However, the termination is only void if, on closer examination of the individual case, it can be shown that the obligation to contract would result in a contract substantially similar to the existing one.

Most favoured nation (MFN) clauses

An MFN clause requires a supplier to treat the buyer as well as it treats any other buyer.

MFN clauses that do not prevent, restrict or distort competition do not fall under article 101(1) TFEU and are allowed. An example are retrospective MFN clauses, where the contracting party agrees to grant the most favourable conditions to the customer as previously granted to other customers.

MFN clauses that prevent, restrict or distort competition are exempted under the European Commission's vertical block exemption regulation (VBER) if the market share of each of the contracting party and the customer is below 30%.

If the MFN clauses are not exempted by the VBER, they will have to be assessed individually under article 101(3) TFEU. To assess whether the MFN clause in question prevents, restricts or distorts competition, the guidelines are used. Considerations include, among others, the nature of the agreement, the market position of the parties and their competitors, as well as buyers of the contract products and barriers to entry.

The two main concerns that can arise from the use of MFN clauses are retail price maintenance (RPM) and the exchange of commercially sensitive information. RPM can arise because a supplier has no incentive to lower prices for customers other than the MFN customer because such decreases will have to be matched (and occasionally may incur retrospective compensation). Information exchange can arise because, in order to know whether the MFN clause is in fact being given due effect, the MFN customer needs to know the prices being charged by the supplier to other customers.

UK position

There are no recent OFT decisions regarding MFN clauses. In any event, there are no specific UK unfair trade rules on MFN clauses and the UK position is largely determined by the VBER and accompanying guidelines. The European Commission has concluded in a number of cases (such as gas pipelines, Opodo, Hollywood film distribution and copyright societies) that MFN clauses can give rise to competition concerns such as those referred to above (ie RPM and information exchange). However, in practice, MFN clauses, when investigated at European Commission level, have not given rise to fines but the parties have generally removed MFN clauses from their agreements so that the Commission can then close the case.

French position

Automatically benefiting from more favourable conditions granted to competitors by the contracting party is prohibited under French unfair trade rules as amended in 2008.

It is also prohibited to obtain or seek to obtain an advantage from a business partner that does not correspond to a commercial service provided, or is manifestly disproportionate to the value of the service provided. Such an advantage could also include a request to bring commercial conditions into line with commercial conditions granted to other customers.

These prohibitions were introduced to bring parties to the negotiating table and avoid abuses of bargaining power, created by the automatic nature and lack of consideration implicit in these sorts of clauses.

The newly amended unfair trade rules go even further by prohibiting the imposition of or any attempt to impose conditions on a business partner that create a significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties.

The notion of "significant imbalance" is extremely vague and judges have a great deal of discretion in interpreting it. It is therefore worthwhile for parties to undertake a detailed review of their contracts, to ensure that there are no risks under the French unfair trade rules regime.

German position

In Germany, the GWB, together with the VBER and accompanying guidelines, govern the treatment of MFN clauses.

Prior to 2005, MFN clauses that imposed an obligation on the supplier were held to hinder competition and were void under German law. Since 2005, EU law (including the VBER and the guidelines) has been integrated into the application of the GWB by reference (section 2(2) GWB).

Additionally, if a dominant undertaking uses excessive pressure to obtain a favourable MFN clause, the conduct could fall under the German Act against Unfair Competition (UWG) section 4, para 1 and 10, in which case the conduct needs to be stopped and an action for damages can arise (see below).

Upfront access payments / listing fees

Upfront access payments (UAPs) are common in the retail sector, where grocery retailers will often require such payments from suppliers. UAPs are defined in the European Commission's recent VBER guidelines as fixed fees that suppliers pay to distributors in the framework of a vertical relationship at the beginning of a relevant period, in order to get access to their distribution network and remunerate services provided to the suppliers by the distributors.

According to the VBER, UAPs are allowed in principle (if the market share of both the manufacturer and the retailer are each below 30%) and are only exceptionally found to result in anticompetitive foreclosure. UAPs can lead to a more efficient allocation of shelf space, reduce the asymmetry in information between suppliers and distributors and so benefit customers.

In the VBER guidelines, UAPs may have anticompetitive effects on the market and will not be exempted, where they (1) lead to anticompetitive foreclosure (ie the widespread use of upfront access payments increases the barriers to entry for small entrants); (2) lead to an increase in the retail price and reduce the incentive to compete on price on the downstream market (ie where the distribution market is highly concentrated); and (3) increase the barriers to entry for smaller suppliers on the market.

UK position

In the UK, the grocery retail sector has been under significant regulatory scrutiny by the competition authorities for some time. The latest in-depth investigation was the CC market investigation into the groceries sector (referred to above). During that investigation, the CC received a number of complaints about UK grocery retailers imposing UAPs.

However, the CC was unable to find any evidence to suggest that lump-sum payments to grocery retailers act as a significant barrier to entry or expansion for small suppliers. In addition, the CC did not find any evidence that obtaining lump-sum payments from suppliers distorts competition between grocery retailers or between suppliers. Rather, the CC considered that by compensating a retailer for the risks and costs of listing new products, UAPs such as slotting allowances may facilitate the introduction of products that retailers may otherwise be deterred from stocking.

This relatively relaxed view of UAPs is mirrored in the (more recent) VBER guidelines' treatment of UAPs, where the European Commission only identifies competition concerns in a small number of scenarios (such as where the UAPs are so high that they constitute a barrier to entry for smaller suppliers).

Nevertheless, as a result of the GSCOP remedy, since February 2010 major grocery retailers in the UK are subject to a new code. This states that a retailer must not directly or indirectly require a supplier to make any payment as a condition of stocking or listing that supplier's grocery products, unless such payment is made (1) in relation to a promotion; or (2) in respect of grocery products which have not been stocked, displayed or listed by that retailer during the preceding 365 days in 25% or more of its stores, and reflects a reasonable estimate by that retailer of the risk run by that retailer in stocking, displaying or listing such new grocery products.

French position

UAPs are not prohibited per se and are also common practice in the retail sector in France. However, they should not be required without being part of an actual commercial relationship and being accompanied by orders.

French unfair trade rules prohibit obtaining or seeking to obtain an advantage, as a precondition to placing orders, without a written agreement on a proportionate volume of purchase. In other words, asking for a fee to be paid without any consideration is prohibited.

German position

The UWG, in combination with the GWB, can prohibit UAPs or other conduct which has the potential to hinder noticeably competitors, consumers or other participants in the market (section 3 UWG; examples listed in section 4 UWG).

Where a retailer demands UAPs from its supplier, threatening to treat the supplier detrimentally if such UAPs are not paid (ie threatening to terminate or not to enter into a commercial relationship), such conduct is generally allowed, unless the retailer is a dominant undertaking or threatens the use of other, unfair conduct (eg to break existing contracts, to denigrate him to third parties or to leak internal issues to the public). However, the provisions of the UWG are used restrictively so as not to undermine the GWB provisions protecting competition.


There are specific penalty regimes in France and Germany that are somewhat different from the UK.

French position

French unfair trade rules provide that any interested third party can bring an action for damages to compensate for losses suffered. Although unfair trade rules do not fall within the French competition authority's jurisdiction, the authority's president can refer a case to courts if there is a possible unfair trade infringement. In addition, the minister of economy and the public prosecutor can request that courts (1) order that the practices be stopped and/or (2) declare an infringing clause void and/or (3) order the reimbursement of the sums unduly paid and/or (4) impose a civil fine amounting to a maximum of €2m which can be increased to three times the sums unduly paid.

Up to now, the minister of economy has mainly brought actions to protect suppliers against large retail chains (recently imposing a civil fine of €300,000), but these rules can be applied in all sectors.

The number of lawsuits based on unfair trade rules increases every year (approximately 16 judgments in 2005, 21 in 2006, 29 in 2007 and 35 in 2008). The total amount of fines in 2008 was €1.54m, although individual fines can be as little as €20,000.

It should be noted that, to avoid lack of enforcement of these provisions, the minister of economy and/or the public prosecutor can bring cases even if the "victim" does not wish for this to happen.

German position

In Germany, an action for damages can be brought by competitors under section 9 UWG. However, this only applies to direct competitors and does not enable damages to be claimed by parties which are in a vertical relationship with the defendants. Damages can only be claimed where the infringement of the UWG has been committed intentionally or negligently. Damages caused by the infringement are assessed under the German civil code and are calculated as the loss of profits. The damages can be estimated by the court under the German civil procedure rules. If the damages are estimated by the court, the claimant has to provide at least the basis on which the damages are calculated, which can prove difficult. Additionally, restitution can be claimed in certain cases.


It is clear from the above-mentioned analysis that France stands out as the jurisdiction where unfair trade rules cover a particularly broad array of conduct and where the uncertainty about how certain key concepts will be applied is greatest. Nevertheless, the authors believe that all in-house competition and regulatory counsel would do well to remember that competition law is not the only area where businesses are exposed to significant risks – unfair trade rules can also lead to similarly undesirable consequences when they are breached.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.