UK: Section 333 of The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Part 7) – Evil of Money Laundering vis a vis The Rights of Individuals

Last Updated: 15 October 2010

By Kartik Mittal, Zaiwalla & Co. Solicitors

All civilised societies today recognise the principle of 'Rule of Law' which provides for supremacy of law i.e. No man is above the Law. This principle enriches within itself the concept that all decisions should be based on reason and thus a Government or any of its body should not act arbitrarily but rationally in accordance with the principles governing the society.

Today we live in a society which is faced with the evils of drugs, crime, terrorism and human trafficking. To fight against these evils it is essential to curb the funding on which the organisations promoting these evils thrive. To achieve this end many countries around the world have promulgated Money Laundering Legislation to ensure that the funding to such organisations stop.

The Money Laundering framework in the United Kingdom is provided under Part 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ('POCA 2002'). The aim of this article is to establish ways to harmonise the purpose of this legislation with the age old accepted principles of Human Rights.

For the sake of brevity, this Article only focuses on the Tipping off provision under Section 3331, Part 7 of the POCA 2002.

Section 333 of POCA 2002 has been subject to judicial scrutiny by the Courts in the landmark case of: K Limited v. National Westminster Bank Plc (CA)2. In this case Lord Justice Longmore in his judgment laid down the principle that bankers cannot be compelled to comply with their contractual obligation to disclose all material facts in relation to its customer's account or to carry out his instructions with diligence during the period when an investigation under section 337 or 338 of POCA 2002 is ongoing.

In the K limited case, the Court of Appeal did not have the opportunity to delve into the details of Section 333 of POCA 2002, and thus there remain many questions unanswered. The K Limited case failed to answer the following questions:-

  1. What is the nature of information which, in the opinion of the Court, may be likely to prejudice any investigation?
  2. What is the meaning of the term 'investigation'? Will it cover investigations conducted by an agency other than the agency to which a disclosure under section 337 or 338 has been made?
  3. At what time an investigation is deemed to have commenced and to have ended?


Recently in 2010, the case of Jayesh Shah against HSBC came before the Court of Appeal in an Appeal against a Summary Judgement order passed by Mr. Justice Hamblen (High Court Queen's Bench Division). The facts of this case have provided the opportunity for the Court of Appeal to fill the lacuna in this law and thus this case is likely to lay down the Law for times to come.

The decision to permit leave to appeal to Mr Shah had been anxiously awaited by many, in order to see how the Court of Appeal would manage the onerous task of drawing a balance between, on the one hand, the statutory powers of the investigating authorities and the Community of Bankers/Regulated sector under Money Laundering legislation and on the other hand, the implied and contractual right of the individual to be provided with information concerning their own bank accounts.

In this case the Court of Appeal has been called upon to explain the meaning of its own words when it stated in the K Limited v. National Westminster Bank Plc (CA)3, in vague terms as follows:

'The truth is that parliament has struck a precise and workable balance of conflicting interests in the 2002 Act. It is, of course, true that to intervene between a banker and his customer in performance of the contract of mandate is serious interference with the free flow of trade. But the parliament has considered that a limited interference is to be tolerated in preference to allowing the undoubted evil of money laundering to run rife in the commercial community. The fact that the interference lasts only for seven working days in what we were told were the majority of cases and a further 31 days only, unless the relevant authority goes to the length of applying to the court for a restraining order when all cards will have to be on the table in any event, shows that the interference with freedom of trade is limited.'

The Long awaited Judgement in Shah v HSBC4 was finally delivered on Thursday, 4th February 2010. The Court of Appeal while delivering its Judgment accepted that this was a novel case which raises questions which the Court had not considered in the past. The Court upheld the plea of Mr Shah. It ordered the Summary Judgment to be set aside and directed that the matter should go to Trial.

While making this order the Court made various observations on the factual and legal points in order to guide the Lower Court in determining various questions that would come before the trial court, including the question as to the interpretation of section 333 of POCA 2002.

The Court of Appeal began by stating that the facts of this case were different from any previous cases that had come before the Court. The Precedents, namely K Limited v. National Westminster Bank5 and R (UMBS online Ltd) v. SOCA6 dealt with circumstances where the conduct of the Bank and Serious Organised Crime Agency was called into question during the initial period of 7 working days followed by the 31 days moratorium period. Thus the Court indicated that these cases can only help the Trial judge to a limited extent rather than being considered as a precedent.

Lord Justice Longmore in the Shah case emphasised the importance of section 333 of the POCA 2002 and stated that this was an important provision to ensure that Banks do not make any disclosure which is likely to prejudice any investigation which might be conducted following the original disclosure. However, the Court of Appeal further made it clear that there has to be a time when a disclosure could be made by a bank to an account holder without attracting Section 333 of POCA 2002.

The Shah Matter has now been remanded for Trial and we will have to wait and see how the Courts will interpret Section 333 of POCA 2002 in light of this latest Judgement of the Court of Appeal.


In my view, one of the ways to reconcile this legislation with the rights of individuals will be to interpret the legislation in the following way-

  1. The investigations under Part 7 of the POCA 2002 shall be deemed to commence on the day a report to Serious Organised Crime Agency ('SOCA') has been made by the Bank, and shall initially last for 7 working days until consent is obtained or deemed to be obtained or refused under Section 335 of POCA. Upon receipt of the consent, it shall be deemed that SOCA does not deem it necessary for any further investigations to be carried out based on the material before them. In cases where SOCA refuses consent, the Investigation can continue only for a further period of 31 days. At the expiry of that period, it will be essential for the appropriate authority to seek an order of the Court seeking further time to investigate the matter or a restraining order as the Court may determine. By establishing such a framework the Courts can ensure that the enforcement agencies can arbitrarily restrict an act/transaction to be carried out only for a limited period of time, at the expiry of which it shall be the Court which will, after hearing the parties, decide the reasonableness of the enforcement agency's decision on the facts of the case.
  2. Under Section 333 POCA, a person commits an offence if he discloses any information which is likely to prejudice any investigation. It is difficult to ascertain as to exactly what information will attract this section without taking into account the facts of each case. But generally one might have the view that basic information such as the complaint reference number, name of the agency and date of disclosure will not prejudice any investigation. Further in my view, it will be reasonable to state that section 333 of POCA shall only be operative until the time that an investigation under Part 7 of POCA is being carried out by the appropriate agency.
  3. An investigation conducted by any investigative arm of the government shall be deemed to be an investigation under the Act to the extent that such an investigation is carried out directly in relation to a disclosure made under Section 337 or 338 of POCA. An investigation carried out by an agency (Example Met Police) for the reason that another agency (for Example SOCA) is carrying out an investigation into the alleged offender's assets under POCA 2002 should not come within the term 'investigation' under this legislation. This is because such investigations would have been instigated by a suspicion indirectly induced from a pending investigation pursuant to a disclosure under Section 337 or Section 338 of POCA, and thus is not an investigation directly resulting out of a disclosure under section 337 or 338 of POCA.

Finally, The Court of Appeal in the Shah v. HSBC Judgment states as follows

'By the time of any trial the dust will have settled and it is most unlikely that that the tipping-off provision will continue to be relevant. It will also almost certainly be known whether any investigation is or might be taking place which any disclosure by admissible evidence in court proceedings would be likely to prejudice within section 333(1). If any such investigation is occurring (or is likely to occur) the court can be informed of that matter in an admissible manner. But it is, in my judgment, too strong for court to say now that the bank would be bound to win any trial and should, therefore, now be entitled to summary judgment.'


1. Tipping off

(1) A person commits an offence if—

(a) he knows or suspects that a disclosure falling within section 337 or 338 has been made, and

(b) he makes a disclosure which is likely to prejudice any investigation which might be conducted following the disclosure referred to in paragraph (a).

(2) But a person does not commit an offence under subsection (1) if—

(a) he did not know or suspect that the disclosure was likely to be prejudicial as mentioned in subsection (1);

(b) the disclosure is made in carrying out a function he has relating to the enforcement of any provision of this Act or of any other enactment relating to criminal conduct or benefit from criminal conduct;

(c) he is a professional legal adviser and the disclosure falls within subsection (3).

(3) A disclosure falls within this subsection if it is a disclosure—

(a) to (or to a representative of) a client of the professional legal adviser in connection with the giving by the adviser of legal advice to the client, or

(b) to any person in connection with legal proceedings or contemplated legal proceedings.

(4) But a disclosure does not fall within subsection (3) if it is made with the intention of furthering a criminal purpose.

2. [2007] 1 WLR

3. [2007] 1 WLR

4. [2010] ECWA Civ 31

5. ibid

6. [2007] Bus L.R. 1317

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.