UK: Employment Update

Last Updated: 18 August 2010
Article by David Green

DAVID'S OPINION PIECE

The Equality Act - a missed opportunity?

The survey we conducted on legislation highlighted a trait of human nature. It appears that once we get used to a piece of legislation then we become comfortable with it, whereas more recent legislation or forthcoming legislation creates a fear of the unknown or a dread of having to change policies and educate line managers on how to deal with new legislation. This is an understandable human reaction but is that trait preventing real change?

The Equality Act is arguably an example of missed opportunity. It is a consolidating statute but it could have been so much more. Its upside is it brings consistency to discrimination legislation. It allows managers to build on known principles and policies – it was the safe and easy option. However, if you step back from the tried and tested and take people outside their comfort zone, then, in my view, there was an opportunity to take a radical change of approach.

The cynics amongst you will say any radical change will bring with it chaos where only the lawyers benefit, but I think we need to move away from the formulaic and create an environment where the discriminated against are protected, but where the realities and practicalities of real life can be dealt with in an open, honest debate.

Discrimination legislation has brought about worthwhile change. Legislation was needed to bring about a change in attitudes, but we now have such a rigid system that it often prevents an open and honest discussion. Many employers will say rigidity and certainty are preferable to flexibility that will bring about chaos, but as the economic climate has shown, flexibility can be key to growth.

Legislation overload?

The aim our of updates is to keep you informed of the all too frequent changes in employment legislation. However, perhaps this won't be necessary in the future following the Coalition Government's recent Your Freedom initiative on what legislation the public would like to see restricted or removed altogether.

In the spirit of that exercise we surveyed our clients and contacts to see what employment legislation they would like to see gone for good, as well as what they strongly supported. The results revealed that the most unpopular legislation was that which has yet to be implemented. 50% of respondents wanted to get rid of the agency regulations due to come into effect in October 2011; and 31% wanted to get rid of the new provisions for shared leave and pay, which do not take effect until April 2011. We could also see signs of equality legislation taking time to align with public views, as long-standing legislation on sex, race and disability discrimination were all strongly supported, whereas religious discrimination and age discrimination, which have been introduced more recently, were supported slightly less so.

It is worth remembering though that much of our employment legislation is now derived from EU legislation, and so, even if there is strong support for change, as in the case of agency worker legislation, there is little the UK government can do about this. It remains to be seen what steps the Government will take but in the meantime we will continue to keep you updated of relevant changes.

News

Retirement age to be scrapped

The Government's consultation on the proposal to remove the default retirement age by 1 October 2011 has received a lot of press attention. What the proposals would mean in practice is that:

  • no new notices of intended retirement could be issued under the current retirement procedure after 6 April 2011;
  • transitional arrangements would apply to retirements notified before 6 April 2011 to take effect before 1 October 2011; and
  • any retirements notified before 6 April 2011 but intended to take effect after 1 October 2011 would not be valid - unless objectively justified.

This would not mean that employers will not be able to retire employees, but any retirement dismissal after 1 October 2011 will need to be objectively justified.

The consultation exercise closes on 21 October 2010 but change to the fundamentals of the proposal (as we highlight above) is not expected. Employers therefore need to start thinking now about how to plan for this change. The most important decision will be whether to have a retirement age at all and if so, whether it can be objectively justified. Issues to consider include performance management, appraisals, career development and succession planning.

Increase in Tribunal claims

The Tribunals Service recently published its annual statistics for the year to end March 2010 which showed a large increase in the number of claims submitted of 56%. This is partly down to a rise in multiple claims (for example large scale equal pay disputes), which are up by 90%. The report also shows that Employment Tribunals are struggling to keep up with the increase in caseload, leading to a greater backlog than in previous years.

Vetting and barring – the brakes are put on

The Government has announced an immediate halt to the proposed vetting and barring scheme, which is to be remodelled, although in what form is not yet clear.

Greasy palms

The Government has announced that the implementation of the Bribery Act 2010 has been delayed and is now due to come into force in April another person and being bribed. It also introduces a new corporate offence where a person associated with the organisation bribes another person intending to obtain a business advantage. There will be a defence for the organisation if it has "adequate procedures" in place to prevent bribery, but there is currently no guidance on what these are. The delay in implementation is to allow full consultation on this defence.

The end of the right to request time off to train?

This right, which was only introduced in April this year, is now the subject of consultation. In line with their aim of reducing regulation, the Government are seeking views on whether the regulations should be repealed or retained. Anyone wishing to give their views should do so by 15 September 2010.

Age: objective justification: Age discrimination legislation is nearly 4 years old and with the likely removal of the default retirement age next year, the defence of objective justification will be key. Two recent decisions help demonstrate what the tribunals are looking for.

In Seldon v Clarkson, Wright & Jakes, the Court of Appeal held that the compulsory retirement of partners aged 65 from a firm of solicitors was a proportionate means of achieving the legitimate aim of workforce planning. Significantly, it held that the Heyday ruling did not mean that legitimate aims for private employers had to be of a social policy or public interest nature, making it easier for employers to satisfy the test. The Court considered the choice of 65 was a "fair and proportionate cut-off point" supported by the default retirement age of 65 for employees (rather than partners). However, once this is removed, employers will need to look carefully at the reasons for choosing a particular retirement age.

In Kraft Foods UK Ltd v Hastie the EAT held that capping a generous contractual redundancy scheme, which had the effect of preventing an employee who was approaching retirement from receiving a "windfall", was a legitimate aim. In this case the purpose of the cap was to prevent the employee receiving more than he would have earned had he stayed in employment until retirement. This builds on the earlier EAT decision Loxley v BAE Land Systems which suggested that tapering schemes for the same reason were potentially justifiable.

Disability: The Disability Discrimination Act throws up much confusion for employers. It is not as straightforward as other strands of discrimination as, for example, there is the legal question of whether the individual has a disability and what might be a reasonable adjustment. The following cases highlight the difficulties employers often face.

In Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police v Jelic the EAT found that swapping the role of a disabled police officer with that of a non-disabled police officer, would have been a reasonable adjustment. This would appear to extend the duty on employers to include a consideration of occupied posts as well as vacant posts when considering reasonable adjustments. However, a key factor in this case was the fact that the nature of the police force was one of a disciplined service with a duty to obey lawful orders which extended to changing roles as directed. Whilst it will always depend on the nature of the business as to whether such an adjustment would be "reasonable", this decision may mark the start of a more general development in this regard.

"Depression" is always a difficult issue for employers. Stress, anxiety and depression can often seem to be used interchangeably by employees and GPs. In J v DLA Piper UK LLP the EAT gave some guidance on how the issue of whether someone has a disability in this context should be approached. Rather than get stuck in detailed medical issues, the Tribunal should look at the effect of the condition on the individual. If it finds that the condition has a substantial adverse affect, then it will, in most cases follow that the claimant is suffering from a condition that has caused that effect. It will then be unnecessary for the tribunal to address the precise medical issues giving rise to that effect.

Holiday: The issue of holiday entitlement for those on long-term sick leave has been a major headache for employers since the Stringer ruling last year. However, the recent tribunal decision in Khan v Martin McColl suggests that employers may be able to prevent a successful claim for unlawful deduction from wages in respect of accrued untaken holiday for previous holiday years, where they have made a payment for holiday in the current holiday year – in this case on termination. The tribunal found that this broke the series of deductions and Mr Khan's claim was out of time. The tribunal also found that as Mr Khan had not requested holiday he had not been "denied" it. Although this is only a tribunal decision, and therefore not binding, it is nevertheless a very useful ruling.

Pension focus: Autoenrolment 2012

Charles Russell recently hosted the City HR Group and their guest speaker Iain Duncan-Smith, for a question and answer session on his proposals for pension reform in the UK. While most of the press coverage has concentrated on the headline grabbing matter of raising the retirement age, there has been little mention of the intention to review auto-enrolment and NEST - the National Employee Savings Trust. The Government wants to conduct a short review to see whether the auto-enrolment plans are still effective and appropriate in light of the financial down-turn and the increase in retirement age.

THE DIGESTED READ

From 2012 employers will be required to automatically enrol all of their employees into either their own pension scheme or the NEST scheme. Employer contributions will be required and currently the plan is for 3%. Employees may choose to opt-out once they have been autoenrolled, but the employer cannot encourage its employees to opt-out.

These proposals, however, are currently under review and we are in the dark about the future until the review has been concluded at the end of September.

Can employers expect auto-enrolment to be scrapped?

No, it will happen in some form. Pension provision is becoming increasingly expensive and it has to come from one of three sources – the State, employers or individuals.

So if some form of auto-enrolment is likely to stay, what is the review going to look at?

It seems that the Government is not convinced that the current proposals achieve what they want (whatever that is) and will be looking at:

  • What age should people start being automatically enrolled?
  • What earnings threshold should apply before employers have to auto-enrol?
  • What size of employer should have to auto-enrol?
  • Should auto-enrolment start on day one of someone's employment?
  • Whether NEST is the right vehicle for the purpose?

What should employers be doing now?

It would probably be sensible to wait for the conclusions of the review due by 30 September 2010. However some form of auto-enrolment is likely to be introduced and you should probably be prepared for:

  • Employer contributions – it is highly unlikely employers will be let completely off the hook following the review. If you currently don't provide any employer contributions or if you do, but most employees don't take up the option, then you could be looking at significant payroll hit as auto-enrolment is phased in. Salary increases over the next few years should probably be made with this in mind.
  • Admin systems – the current format has a complicated structure and there was industry concern that this would prove problematic for employers, especially smaller ones. So hopefully 30 September 2010 will bring good news for HR and payroll departments.

KEY POINTS TO TAKE AWAY

  • Start planning now for the removal of the default retirement age.
  • Where employees are off on long-term sick leave, a payment of holiday for the current holiday year may prevent a successful claim for unlawful deductions from wages relating to accrued untaken holiday for previous years.
  • A reasonable adjustment can, in certain circumstances, include swapping roles.
  • Ensure you are prepared for the changes coming into effect under the Equality Act and new statutory code on 1 October 2010 by attending our seminar.
  • "Watch this space" for developments pending including vetting and barring, the Bribery Act and auto-enrolment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
David Green
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions