UK: A Summary of Recent Developments in Insurance, Reinsurance and Litigation Law

Last Updated: 15 July 2010
Article by Nigel Brook

Abbey Forwarding Ltd v Hone Varying a freezing order/meaning of "ordinary course of business"

http://www.bailii.org/cgibin/ markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2010/1532.html

A freezing order obtained by the provisional liquidator of a company against three former directors contained the standard form provision that the respondent could still use any of his assets "in the ordinary and proper course of business". The directors wanted to make a loan to another company (Wingpitch) of which they were also directors and shareholders. Morgan J held that the loan was proper (i.e. it was not a device to release money from the freezing order), but it was not "in the ordinary course of business". The way in which Wingpitch had been carried on in the past had not involved the directors lending money to it (in fact, money always passed from Wingpitch to the directors). The directors' intention to make the loan to Wingpitch "involves them stepping outside anything that has happened before and anything that is in the nature of an established practice".

The judge went on to consider whether he ought to exercise his general discretion to vary the freezing order. He referred to the principles which he ought to have regard to (as summarised in Noga v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group [2006]), in particular: 1) the interests of justice; 2) the purpose of the freezing order; 3) the consequences of allowing or refusing the variation; and 4) the alternatives available to the directors.

The judge concluded ("by a very short head") that the order should be varied. Although it was suggested that the directors could obtain money from other sources, there were difficulties for them in doing so and the evidence was not definitive.

Pacific v Surkis & Ors Appropriate forum and defects in another country's legal system

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2010/753.html

The first instance decision in this case was reported in Weekly Update 28/09. In this case, it was accepted that the courts of Ukraine were the natural forum to hear the dispute. However, the claimant had commenced proceedings in England on the basis that he could not obtain justice in Ukraine. This argument was rejected by Blackburne J and the claimant appealed. That appeal has now been rejected by the Court of Appeal. Mummery LJ (giving the leading judgment) noted that the appeal could only be allowed if the judge had misdirected himself on the law or it could be shown that he had been influence by irrelevant matters. He said that the judge had rightly focussed on the serious criticisms of the judicial system in Ukraine. However, crucially, there had been no cogent evidence that the defendant or his associates "were successful in manipulating the Ukrainian legal system by improperly influencing the Ukrainian courts in any of the particular cases in which [the claimant] sought to ventilate its claims". In other words, it is not enough that the foreign legal system is defective, the party seeking to bring proceedings in England must also demonstrate that the other party is personally seeking to take advantage of those deficiencies by trying to put pressure on the foreign judges.

Atlantic Air v Hoff

Third party costs orders

A costs order against a non-party to proceedings can be made where there are "exceptional" circumstances (ie "outside the ordinary run of cases", as per the Privy Council decision in Dymocks v Todd [2004]) and an appropriate warning had been given to the third party that an application might be made for costs against him. The judge, Master Fontaine, acknowledged that the underlying claim in this case had been genuine and, although the third party (Mr Kirby) effectively controlled the claimant, he was not a director or officer of the company. Furthermore, it is not an abuse of the process of court for an impecunious claimant to bring a bona fide claim, even though it lacks the means to pay the defendant's cost if it fails and, in this case, Mr Kirby had funded the company but had not directly funded the litigation. Nevertheless, he did make a third party costs order against Mr Kirby on the following bases:

  1. Mr Kirby had effectively controlled the proceedings but was not a director of the claimant company, so no issue of eroding the principle of the separate liability of the company arose;
  2. As a substantial creditor of the company, Mr Kirby would have derived a potential benefit from the proceedings;
  3. Crucially, although there was no evidence of impropriety against Mr Kirby, there was evidence of bad faith (in particular, the claim was conducted in order to cause the defendant to incur the maximum amount of costs and inconvenience); and
  4. Although Mr Kirby was not warned about an application for a third party costs order at the earliest possible opportunity, "it was only when it became apparent that the company was not prepared to fund any adverse costs orders that the warning became necessary". Therefore this was not a factor which prevented the judge from exercising his discretion to make the order.

Gunn & Anor v Taygroup Ltd

Withdrawal of pre-action admission

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2010/1665.html

A defendant does not need the permission of the court to withdraw a pre-action admission (see Stoke on Trent v Walley [2006]). In this case, the claimant sought to strike out those parts of a Defence which resiled from earlier admissions of liability. Akenhead J held as follows:

  1. The first letter sent by the claims handling agents appointed by the defendant's insurers in June 2005 did not amount to an admission. It had been stated that the defendant was "responsible" but this was ambiguous - it might mean liable in law or it might just mean that the defendant had caused the accident. In this case, it was clear from the facts that within weeks, and over the next two years, liability was not admitted. However, a second letter sent in September 2007 was clearly an admission;
  2. It was not asserted by the claimants that there was any bad faith on the part of the defendant and so the court could not strike out all or parts of the Defence on the grounds of "abuse of process" within the meaning of CPR r3.4; and
  3. The Claimants therefore had to show that they would suffer some prejudice which will affect the fairness of the trial if the requisite parts of the Defence are not struck out. Akenhead J held that it was not proper to infer that prejudice had occurred. For example, the claimant could have taken witness statements and secured other documentary evidence in the 28 month period between the accident and the admission. Furthermore, evidence should be produced to show that there was a real possibility that documents which went to liability had been lost post-September 2007.

The judge also commented that it seemed "somewhat unfair" to hold a defendant to an admission of liability on a claim then specifically quantified at around £600,000, when the claim over two years later had increased to over £3.4 million: "It is not at all unlikely that, if in September 2007, the Defendant, its then solicitors and its insurers had known that it faced a claim of over £3.4 million, it would not have admitted liability so readily if there was an arguable defence on the facts."

Owneast Shipping v Qatar Navigation

Meaning of "intention" in a contract

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2010/1663.html

One of the issues in this case was the meaning of "intention" and whether it includes recklessness. The factual context in this case was a clause in a charter which allowed the charterers to rectify a failure to make punctual payment provided there was an "absence of intention". The owners appealed an arbitral award which held that there had been severe incompetence, but not intentional non-payment, by the charterers. Clarke J rejected the appeal. He held that a commercial man in the position of the parties would not extend the meaning of "intention" so as to include recklessness. He said that intention was not a "word of legal art" - it is an ordinary English word and it has a distinct meaning from recklessness. Furthermore, there are many statutory or contractual provisions which make a clear distinction between intent and recklessness. He also rejected the owners' arguments that intention must at least encompass awareness that late payment will be the virtually inevitable consequence of a deliberate course of action: "Someone who is aware that something is the virtually inevitable consequence of his action is very likely, but not certain, to be held to have intended that consequence".

BSkyB v HP Enterprise & Ors Indemnity costs and discretionary interest taking into account taxation

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2010/862.html

One of the issues in this case was whether costs should be assessed on an indemnity basis (rather than the usual standard basis). The judge said that the conduct of one of the defendants had not been so unreasonable as to justify indemnity costs. However, the case is noteworthy insofar as the judge found that a senior employee of the defendant had given perjured evidence and that that conduct could be described as the conduct of the defendant. Nevertheless, Ramsey J held that this was not a case where there had been "a systematic" fraud perpetrated by the defendant and it had had no control over what its employee had said in the witness box.

The judge also held that he should take taxation into account when assessing damages, i.e an allowance should be made for the difference between the Corporation Tax treatment which the lost benefit would have received and the Corporation Tax treatment which the sums awarded as damages are likely to receive (a reduction in Corporation Tax having the result that damages for lost benefits would now be taxed at 28% whereas the benefits for which such damages are providing compensation would have been taxed at the rate of 30% at the relevant time). He also held that, when awarding discretionary interest on those damages pursuant to section 35A of the Senior Courts Act 1981, such interest should be based on the net amount of the lost benefits, after the deduction of tax.

Other News

On 1 July 2010, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) published a paper setting out its programme for the development of its common framework for the supervision of internationally active insurance groups (ComFrame):

http://www.iaisweb.org/__temp/IAIS_initiates_development_of_ComFrame.pdf

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nigel Brook
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.