We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
In Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation
Trust the Court of Appeal considered the claim of a hospital
doctor who had been summarily dismissed for misconduct.
He alleged that the employer had not followed its own disciplinary
procedure and claimed damages for breach of contract and wrongful
dismissal. He claimed that, as a result of the dismissal, he
would never work again in the NHS other than locum posts. He
estimated his current and future loss of earnings at something over
£3million.
In the High Court, the employer successfully argued that on a
wrongful dismissal claim a claimant could only recover i) the
amount that he would have been paid during his notice period (in
this case, three months' salary); and ii) possibly his pay for
the period that he would have remained employed had the
disciplinary procedure been carried out properly.
In the case of Johnson v Unisys the claimant was prevented
from enhancing his damages by claiming for breach of the duty of
trust and confidence. The House of Lords stated that the
implied duty of trust and confidence applicable to every employment
contract does not apply to a dismissal. If an employee thinks
that his dismissal is unfair, he must make a claim of unfair
dismissal to an employment tribunal and any compensatory award will
be capped (currently at £65,300).
However, the claimant in this case successfully argued in the Court
of Appeal that if he is able to show that there was a breach of
contract (the failure to follow correct disciplinary procedure)
prior to the dismissal which caused him loss, he may sue for that
breach in the normal way. Therefore, in such circumstances,
his damages will not necessarily be limited by the length of his
notice period.
Point to Note -
This claimant was able to increase his damages claim by
identifying a breach of contract not necessarily connected to the
dismissal which had caused him loss. The employer's
difficulty in this case arose from the fact that it had two
different disciplinary procedures applicable for personal or
professional misconduct respectively. In this case it tried
to combine the two, fell foul of its own rules and so breached its
own contract. In the case of a senior employee, such a breach
may have a dramatic effect on the amount at stake in the
employee's claim by making it, in effect, unlimited.
Other employers should take note and take legal advice on the
correct procedure.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In the recent decision of Trayhorn v. The Secretary of State for Justice the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that a prison had not indirectly discriminated against a chaplain who was disciplined...
Gowling WLG's employment, labour & equalities experts bring you the latest top five employment law developments that may affect your business - what they are, and what you can do about them.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has updated its code of practice on subject access requests (SARs) to reflect two important Court of Appeal judgments published earlier this year...
In Government Legal Service (GLS) v Brookes, the EAT has considered whether refusing to make adjustments to a multiple choice situational judgment test for a job applicant with Asperger's syndrome...
In J v K and another, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has refused to exercise its discretion to extend the 42 day time limit for lodging an appeal where the Notice of Appeal was filed one hour late.
The EAT has dismissed an appeal by Asda in its on-going equal pay case involving a claim brought by over 7,000 current and former employees (the majority of which are women).
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
How People Are Challenging Their Employment Status (Video)
