UK: Trader Who "Took Part" In Arbitration Proceedings Loses Right To Challenge Arbitrators' Jurisdiction

Last Updated: 14 June 2010
Article by Max Cross and Reema Shour

Broda Agro Trade (Cyprus) Ltd v Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH [2009] EWHC 3318 (Comm)

Background to dispute

The parties in this case were in dispute as to whether there was a validly concluded contract between them for the supply of milling wheat. Toepfer had commenced GAFTA arbitration against Broda pursuant to the GAFTA arbitration clause in that contract, claiming damages for breach of contract. Broda maintained that no valid contract had been entered into and therefore that the arbitration clause in the contract was not binding on them.

The GAFTA arbitration tribunal dealt with the question of their own jurisdiction as a preliminary issue. Broda's foreign lawyers disputed GAFTA's jurisdiction in writing but that correspondence was stated to be "without prejudice and with full reservation of rights".

Broda also sought and obtained a declaration from the Russian court that there was no validly concluded contract between the parties. Nonetheless and with knowledge of the Russian court decision, GAFTA issued an Interim Award on Jurisdiction, concluding that there was a binding contract.

Both parties subsequently served submissions in the substantive dispute. Broda's submissions dealt with issues of liability and damages, as well as summarising their reasons for continuing to contend that the GAFTA tribunal lacked jurisdiction. The Tribunal eventually delivered its Final Award, finding that Broda were in breach of contract and awarding Toepfer damages of over US$5 million plus interest and costs. Broda appealed the Final Award to the GAFTA appeal tribunal. However, it also sought to challenge the Tribunal's jurisdiction in the Commercial Court by seeking relief under sections 72 and 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996.

Section 72 of the Arbitration Act 1996 preserves the common law entitlement which allows a person to seek a declaration that an arbitral tribunal lacks jurisdiction, but its application is limited to circumstances where the applicant has taken no part in the arbitration proceedings. Section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 allows a person to seek to set aside an arbitration award on the grounds of the tribunal's lack of substantive jurisdiction. However, pursuant to section 70(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996, such an application must be made within 28 days from the date of the award. Broda's application to set aside the Interim Award on Jurisdiction under section 67 was 14 months late so they sought an extension of time under section 80(5) of the Arbitration Act 1996.

Commercial Court decision

Mr Justice Teare had to consider whether it could properly be said that Broda took no part in the GAFTA arbitration pursuant to section 72 of the Arbitration Act 1996. He distinguished between, on the one hand, a submission that the arbitrators should not be acting and, on the other hand, attempting to argue the case against jurisdiction so that the arbitrators can consider it. As the judge put it, "a person may inform a tribunal of his view that the tribunal lacks jurisdiction without being held to have taken part in the arbitration proceedings. But if he makes submissions to the tribunal for it to take into account when exercising its jurisdiction under section 30 of the Arbitration Act 1996 to rule on its own substantive jurisdiction he risks being held to have taken part in the arbitration proceedings".

The judge rejected Broda's arguments that section 72 was only concerned with taking part in the arbitration proceedings for the purposes of challenging the tribunal's jurisdiction. He stated that the wording of section 72 did not restrict its scope in the way suggested, it simply stated that a person wishing to avail himself of section 72 should satisfy the condition that he "takes no part in the proceedings", which the judge interpreted to mean the proceedings as a whole.

Having reviewed Broda's correspondence in the present case, the judge did not consider that they had taken part in the arbitration when they corresponded with the Tribunal prior to the Interim Award on Jurisdiction. However, he held that they clearly took part in the arbitration thereafter, in particular by making submissions on the merits of the claim in relation to liability, breach and damages. They had therefore lost their right to seek a declaration pursuant to section 72.

The judge also refused to extend time for Broda's application to set aside the award under section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996. He reviewed the authorities on the way in which the court's discretion to extend time under section 80(5) of the Arbitration Act 1996 should be exercised. These authorities highlighted a number of factors which should be taken into account. These factors included the length of delay which, in this case, was "very considerable", according to the judge.

Another factor was whether the applicant acted reasonably in permitting the time limit to expire and the subsequent delay to occur. In this regard, the essential reason that time expired and delay occurred was that Broda were not in receipt of correct advice on English arbitration law and were not aware of the 28 day time-limit applicable pursuant to section 70(3) of the Act 1996. However, the judge was not sympathetic to this argument. In his view, Broda had not acted reasonably in consulting only Russian lawyers until very late in the day. He emphasised that Broda were grain traders concluding contracts with some of the largest and most reputable grain trading companies located all over the world. They knew that there was a claim against them for over US$5 million and it would not have been unreasonable to incur the costs of an English lawyer's advice in connection with the claim at a much earlier stage.

Additionally, the judge had to consider whether it would be unfair to Broda to deny them the opportunity of having their application under section 67 determined. Mr Justice Christopher Clarke concluded that the hardship that Broda might suffer if time was not extended was not disproportionate to their fault in not seeking advice from an English lawyer. His view was that Broda had taken the risk that the advice they received from Russian lawyers in relation to English law and arbitration would not be appropriate or correct. However, the judge did agree to stay enforcement of the Final Award in favour of Toepfer, pending Broda's appeal of that Award to the GAFTA Appeal Tribunal and provisional on Broda providing adequate security.


Parties to international commercial contracts providing for English law who are faced with arbitration claims against them would be well advised to take English legal advice at an early stage, particularly on their rights and obligations in English arbitration proceedings. As can be seen from Mr Justice Christopher Clarke's decision in this case, ignorance of the law will not be considered a valid excuse for failing to observe the relevant procedure and conforming to the relevant time limits inter alia for challenging the arbitrators' jurisdiction.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions