ARTICLE
24 May 2010

'Whistleblowing' (Can Include Disclosure About Previous Employer)

BB
Bird & Bird

Contributor

Bird & Bird logo

As you adapt and innovate, you'll need a firm that's hardwired to anticipate and uncover the opportunities in change.

You'll need a firm that will ask the right questions to shape the right objective. And you'll need proactive, practical, and commercially led advice on how to get there.

It's what we do and it's what makes us your go-to firm, whether you're facing disruption or creating it.

You can trust us to know your sector as well as you do, to be curious, and to connect the dots to reach solutions others don’t. And you can trust us to deliver as promised – and more.

We'll work closely with you and make things easier for you. We'll look to deliver new improved solutions and services. And we'll take on your problems as if they were our own. But more than that, we'll work as one seamless international team across our business and yours. Giving you access to a whole world of expertise.

The recent EAT decision in the case of "BP plc v Elstone" confirms that a claimant has to be a 'worker' to bring a claim against their current employer that they have suffered a detriment for whistleblowing (otherwise known as making a 'protected disclosure').
United Kingdom Employment and HR
Bird & Bird are most popular:
  • within Finance and Banking topic(s)

Originally published May 2010

The recent EAT decision in the case of BP plc v Elstone confirms that a claimant has to be a 'worker' to bring a claim against their current employer that they have suffered a detriment for whistleblowing (otherwise known as making a 'protected disclosure').

However, the 'protected disclosure' need not have been made to their current employer, provided that it was made to someone who was their employer at the time it was made.

In this case, the claimant had made a complaint about BP safety practices while working for an outside contractor. Later, he took up a post at BP. When BP found out about his previous complaint, they were no longer willing to employ him. He was able to claim for 'whistleblower' protection; this resulted in his dismissal from BP being deemed to be automatically unfair.

www.twobirds.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More