Constitutional Court Annuls Provision On Imprisonment For Opposition To Interim Injunctions

G+
Gun + Partners

Contributor

Gün + Partners is a full-service institutional law firm with a strategic international vision, providing transactional, advisory and dispute resolution services since 1986. The Firm is based in Istanbul, with working offices Ankara and Izmir. The Firm advises in life sciences, energy, construction & real estate, technology, media and telecoms, automotive, FMCG, chemicals and the defence industries.”
Article 398 of the Code of Civil Procedure previously set out that parties which failed to comply with an interim injunction or that violated an injunction would face one to six months' imprisonment.
Turkey Government, Public Sector

Article 398 of the Code of Civil Procedure previously set out that parties which failed to comply with an interim injunction or that violated an injunction would face one to six months' imprisonment.

However, following an application to the Istanbul First Intellectual and Industrial Property Court for the annulment of Article 398, the Constitutional Court decided to cancel the first sentence of Article 398(1) regarding imprisonment for opposition to interim injunctions.(1)

The Constitutional Court's decisions stated that the penalties set out in Article 398 regarding imprisonment were not contrary to the principle of proportionality set out in the Constitution. However, the court concluded that legal certainty and the right to legal remedies were harmed due to Article 398′s lack of clear regulation and the merits of the proceedings and legal remedies in this regard.

The Constitutional Court's annulment decisions are final and as of publication in the Official Gazette, are binding on:

  • legislative, executive and judicial bodies;
  • administrative authorities;
  • and real and legal entities.

Further, the Constitutional Court decided that the annulment decisions will enter into force nine months after their publication in the Official Gazette to prevent the legal gap or confusion that could arise on their immediate entry into force.

The annulment decisions will not be retrospective and previous decisions will not be considered unlawful. Further, Article 398 will remain in force until the annulment decisions come into force.

First published by ILO – Litigation Newsletter, 26.03.2019

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More