The Constitutional Court recently considered a claim that
Article 136(1) of the Turkish Criminal Code ("Criminal
Code") is unconstitutional because there is no clear
definition or limitation for the phrase "personal data",
violating Article 20 (right to privacy) and Article 38 (principle
of legality) of the Turkish Constitution (decision number 2015/32,
12 November 2015). The Constitutional Court rejected the claim,
ruling that technological developments mean it is impossible for
legislators to specify all types of "personal data".
Article 136 of the Criminal Code states that persons that
unlawfully give out, release or acquire personal data belonging to
other people will be subject to imprisonment for between two to
four years. The Criminal Court claimed this is ambiguous because
here are no definite definition or limitation for the phrase
The Constitutional Court noted that protection of personal data
is included within the scope of the right to privacy, which is
guaranteed by Article 20 of the Constitution. Article 136 of the
Criminal Code supports provisions regarding personal data and right
The Constitutional Court considered the principle of legality,
outlined under Article 38 of the Constitution. It noted that the
principle is adopted by the principle that crimes can only be
regulated by law. Article 2 of the Criminal Code states that nobody
can be punished for any act which laws do not count as a crime.
Previous Constitutional Court decisions state that the term
"personal data" refers to all information in relation to
a person that is specific or identifiable. While the European
Convention on Human Rights does not clearly define the term, it
does state that such data is regarded as included in the right to
In the case at hand, the Constitutional Court noted that
depending on the technological advancements, the term
"personal data" may emerge in various forms. Accordingly,
the Constitutional Court accepted that the phrase refers to all
information in relation to a person, which is specific of
identifiable, in accordance with national and international
regulations and court decisions.
Therefore, the Constitutional Court held that Article 136(1) of
the criminal Code did not violate Article 38 or Article 20 of the
Please see this link for the full text of the
Constitutional Court decision (only available in Turkish).
Information first published in the MA | Gazette, a fortnightly legal update newsletter
produced by Moroğlu Arseven.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In this article Filippo Noseda examines the impact of the Common Reporting Standards (CRS), based on practical examples of data transfer and data breaches and analysed in the light of general tax law principles.
Four years after the overhaul of European data protection laws began, the final text of the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) was approved in Spring 2016 and the new rules will come into effect on 25 May 2018.
This update is dedicated to covering the latest legislative developments affecting the way data is managed and protected, as well as reporting on the most recent news governing data breaches and industry developments.
The market of the so-called "connected vehicles" has been considerably growing since 2015. According to a recent study by AlixPartners, 78 million of connected vehicles will be commercialized in 2018, generating a EUR40 billion turnover.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).