Turkey: Why The Cape Town Convention is Really Important?

Last Updated: 21 August 2015
Article by Serap Zuvin and Mehmet Ali Akgun

To understand the success of the Cape Town Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment (2001) ("Cape Town Convention"), which purports to harmonize the law of secured interests of high value mobile equipment in international transactions, we must analyze a case when the Cape Town Convention did not exist. Before the Cape Town Convention, the Geneva Convention[1] applied a uniform conflict of law rule. Therefore, it is important to first understand the concept of conflict of law rules at the outset then observe the provisions of the Geneva Convention so that the importance of the Cape Town Convention can be appreciated.

The Concept of Conflict of Law Rules

The function of conflict of law rules is to indicate merely the legal system which is to be used,[2] not the substantive relief or remedy sought in the particular case as opposed to the internal or domestic law rules. Therefore, conflict of law rules are generally not concerned with the substantive outcome of disputes.[3]

In resolving a conflict of law issue, it is necessary to answer two questions. First, what is the connecting factor designated by the relevant choice of law rule of the forum, and second, according to which system of law should the factor be defined.[4] Many connecting factors comprise one or more elements which may be changed by the wills of the respective parties, such as domicile, or the location (situs) of movable property. This is quite a common problem with tangible movable property, and is specifically a problematic matter with high value mobile equipment.

Lex Situs Argument

The situs of an object, means a settled relation of the object to a particular locality.[5] This relation is similar to the relation between a person and a locality, which we call "domicile". Used in this sense, situs does not include the temporary location of an object, but refers solely to a location which has such a degree of permanence that the object may fairly be described as settled within the place and as forming a part of the mass of property in that place.[6]

In most jurisdictions the law governing rights regarding movable property is the lex situs (the law of the place where the property is situated). The application of the rule, when movables subject to a security interest validly created under the law of one state are moved to another state and thereby acquire a new situs, leads to the question whether a security interest acquired in the first state has an extra-territorial effect outside its jurisdictional boundaries, even though the security, if taken in the state, would be invalid.[7] Furthermore the existence of the conventions like Geneva Convention, efforts and reformulations prepared for conflict of laws rules are definite and constitute persuasive evidence as to inefficiency of the lex situs as a suitable conflict of law rule for determining the validity and priority position of security interest in mobile equipment.[8]

The Geneva Convention

Before the Cape Town Convention, many nations[9] had adopted the Geneva Convention,[10] which opened for signature in 1948. The Geneva Convention is, in essence, a choice of law treaty.[11] Its working method is displacing existing conflict of law rules and allowing aircraft to carry with them the legal attributes of their registration country.[12] It provides that parties to it will recognize "rights in aircraft"[13] that are "regularly recorded"[14] in the national registration jurisdiction of the aircraft, provided that the rights are constituted in accordance with such country's laws.[15] As a result, the regime created by this convention did not require any Contracting State to change its own laws in proprietary rights. On the other hand, the regime created by the Geneva Convention brought a requirement for signatory countries to accept that any aircraft arriving on its territory under another country's flag (another signatory country) carries with it the legal rights and proprietary interests validly prepared and registered under the law of that country.[16]

The Geneva Convention provides international recognition of the inappropriateness of the lex situs as a source of law for determining the validity and efficacy of security interests[17] in mobile equipment. The main focus of the Geneva Convention is to identify a stable source of law in order for the finance organizations involved in secured financing of aircraft have a greatly reduced risk of loss of their security as a result of refusal on the part of forum courts to recognize the validity and enforceability of their security interests.[18] So, it can be said that if lex situs were applied universally and consistently, it would achieve the same sort of result as the Geneva Convention.[19]

However, the situs rule does not always solve the problem of movable assets such as the equipment[20] as the Cape Town Convention deals with. Some countries only apply the law of the first situs (where the aircraft was located at the time of creation of the security) if the security interest is alike to that found in the second situs (place of enforcement). If this place of enforcement is a civil law country with a specifically defined (exhaustive, numerous clausus) list of security interests which can also be created in its territory, a foreign security interest created in a common law country and not corresponding to any security interest known in the place of enforcement may be held to be invalid. It may be treated as if it were a local security interest with results quite different from of those the parties intended. As a main principle, civil law does not accept security interests in mobile equipment where the debtor remains in possession, although this principle is modified to different degrees in civil law countries.[21]

Furthermore, during its implementation certain other problems came into existence for the signatory states of the Geneva Convention. The signatory countries were obliged to accept the effects of property rights, particularly security interests as designated thereunder, of a type which is not possible to create under their own legal system. What is more to that, these states would be obliged to accept rules of priority of security interests which significantly reduce the rights of government agencies to charge an aircraft for unpaid taxes, landing charges, etc.[22] Last but not the least, the Geneva Convention does not have any provision in the way in which a domestic insolvency proceeding is to be balanced against "rights," like leases and mortgages, recorded against an aircraft.[23]

In short, the Geneva Convention does not offer a benchmark for organizing what is a confusing array of laws, rules, and customs that come into play when aircraft perform as expected (i.e. when they travel inter-continentally in the pursuit of revenue for their operators) and when businesses act as businesses do[24] (i.e. they fail at times). One of the purposes of the Geneva Convention is to provide a conflict of law rule for determining validity and place of registration of security interests in aircraft.[25] Therefore, it could be said that while the Geneva Convention is useful in some ways, it is generally (and correctly) seen as a choice of law tool.[26]

The Cape Town Convention

The Cape Town Convention goes beyond the Geneva Convention, in determining the law applicable to securities for aircraft. The Cape Town Convention addresses the "widely differing approaches of legal systems to security and title reservation rights" which creates "uncertainty among intending financiers as to the efficacy of their rights".[27] Such uncertainty inhibits "the extension of finance, particularly to developing countries" and increases borrowing costs.[28]  In this sense, the Cape Town Convention was necessary to create a more predictable and secure, substantive legal environment to address these concerns and solve them, rather than just determining procedurally which legal system would apply should a protectable security interest existed. 

[1] Geneva Convention on the International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft 1948
"The International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), at its Second Assembly held in Geneva in June 1948, approved a Convention on the International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft." Wilberforce, R. O. (1948). The International Recognition of Rights in Aircraft. International Law Quarterly, pp.421-458. p.421

[2] In case of renvoi they indicate the conflict of law rules of the countries.

[3] Carruthers, J. M. (2005). The Transfer of Property in the Conflict of Laws. Oxford University Press. p.1

[4] Ibid. p.2

[5] Beale, J. H. (1919). The Situs of Things. Yale Law Journal, 525-541. P.525

[6] Ibid.

[7] Supra. Gopalan, S. (2003). Harmonization of Commercial Law: Lessons from the Cape Town Convention on
International Interests in Mobile Equipment. p.256

[8] Cuming, R. C. (1990). International Regulation of Aspects of Security Interests in Mobile Equipment. I Unif. L. Rev. os, pp.62-206 p.139

[9] 89 parties are signatory to the Convention.

[10] Supra note 1.

[11] Stone, T. A. (1999). In Flight between Geneva and Rome: Abandoning Choice of Law Systems for Substantive Legal Principles in International Aircraft Finance. U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L., 20, pp.487-500, p.492

[12] McGairl, S. J. (1999). Proposed UNIDROIT Convention: International Law for Asset Finance (Aircraft), The. Unif. L. Rev. ns, 4, pp.439-462. P.443

[13] Article 1 of the Geneva Convention

[14] Ibid.

[15] Article 1 of the Geneva Convention, Stone, T. A. (1999). In Flight between Geneva and Rome: Abandoning Choice of Law Systems for Substantive Legal Principles in International Aircraft Finance. U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L., 20, pp.487-500, p.492

[16] McGairl, S. J. (1999). Proposed UNIDROIT Convention: International Law for Asset Finance (Aircraft), The. Unif. L. Rev. ns, 4, pp.439-462. P.443

[17] "The Geneva Convention takes as its starting point a nationally created property interest, whereas the Cape Town Convention uses an international interest." Wool, J. (1999). Next Generation of International Aviation Finance Law: An Overview of the Proposed UNIDROIT Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment as Applied to Aircraft Equipment. U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L., 20, pp.499-567. p.557

[18] Supra. Cuming, R. C. (1990). p. 113

[19] Supra. McGairl, S. J. (1999)P.445

[20] Airframes, aircraft engines and helicopters; railway rolling stocks; and space assets. Article 2(3) 

[21] Supra .McGairl, S. J. (1999). P.445

[22] McGairl, S. J. (1999). Proposed UNIDROIT Convention: International Law for Asset Finance (Aircraft), The. Unif. L. Rev. ns, 4, pp.439-462. P.445

[23] Supra Stone. (1999) p.493 

[24] Supra Stone. (1999) p.495  

[25] Supra Cuming, R. C. (1990). p.111 

[26] Supra Stone, T. A. (1999). p.49 

[27] Overview of Cape Town Convention, UNIDROIT, February 21, 2014, available at http://www.unidroit.org/overview-2001capetown.

[28] Ibid.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Serap Zuvin
Mehmet Ali Akgun
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions